Literature DB >> 35832636

Biomechanical Study of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Devices Using Finite Element Modeling.

Narayan Yoganandan1, Yuvaraj Purushothaman2, Hoon Choi2, Jamie Baisden2, Deepak Rajasekaran2, Anjishnu Banerjee3, Davidson Jebaseelan4, Shekar Kurpad5.   

Abstract

Many artificial discs for have been introduced to overcome the disadvantages of conventional anterior discectomy and fusion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of different U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) on the range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure, and facet force variables under physiological loading. A validated three-dimensional finite element model of the human intact cervical spine (C2-T1) was used. The intact spine was modified to simulate CDAs at C5-C6. Hybrid loading with a follower load of 75 N and moments under flexion, extension, and lateral bending of 2 N·m each were applied to intact and CDA spines. From this work, it was found that at the index level, all CDAs except the Bryan disc increased ROM, and at the adjacent levels, motion decreased in all modes. The largest increase occurred under the lateral bending mode. The Bryan disc had compensatory motion increases at the adjacent levels. Intradiscal pressure reduced at the adjacent levels with Mobi-C and Secure-C. Facet force increased at the index level in all CDAs, with the highest force with the Mobi-C. The force generally decreased at the adjacent levels, except for the Bryan disc and Prestige LP in lateral bending. This study demonstrates the influence of different CDA designs on the anterior and posterior loading patterns at the index and adjacent levels with head supported mass type loadings. The study validates key clinical observations: CDA procedure is contraindicated in cases of facet arthroplasty and may be protective against adjacent segment degeneration.
Copyright © 2021 by ASME.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 35832636      PMCID: PMC8597568          DOI: 10.1115/1.4049907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eng Sci Med Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2572-7958


  25 in total

1.  Load-carrying capacity of the human cervical spine in compression is increased under a follower load.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; R M Havey; A J Ghanayem; H Diener; K P Meade; B Dunlap; S D Hodges
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Finite element analysis of the cervical spine: a material property sensitivity study.

Authors:  S Kumaresan; N Yoganandan; F A Pintar
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Sensitivity studies of pediatric material properties on juvenile lumbar spine responses using finite element analysis.

Authors:  D Davidson Jebaseelan; C Jebaraj; Narayan Yoganandan; S Rajasekaran; Rishi M Kanna
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Ung-Kyu Chang; Daniel H Kim; Max C Lee; Rafer Willenberg; Se-Hoon Kim; Jesse Lim
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-07

Review 5.  Biomechanical studies on cervical total disc arthroplasty: a literature review.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Biomechanical analysis of cervical range of motion and facet contact force after a novel artificial cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Wei Yuan
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  Radiographic Changes in the Cervical Spine Following Anterior Arthrodesis: A Long-Term Analysis of 166 Patients.

Authors:  Raj D Rao; Donald R Gore; Shu-Jie Tang; Brandon J Rebholz; Narayan Yoganandan; Mei Wang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  External and internal responses of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A finite element modeling study.

Authors:  Yuvaraj Purushothaman; Narayan Yoganandan; Davidson Jebaseelan; Hoon Choi; Jamie Baisden
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-03-22

9.  Comparison of cervical spine biomechanics after fixed- and mobile-core artificial disc replacement: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Yang-Jin Im; Ki-Tack Kim; Yoon-Hyuk Kim; Won-Man Park; Kyungsoo Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Biomechanics following skip-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus skip-level cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element-based study.

Authors:  Ting-Kui Wu; Yang Meng; Bei-Yu Wang; Xin Rong; Ying Hong; Chen Ding; Hua Chen; Hao Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.