Literature DB >> 12365788

Patient-specific spine models. Part 1: Finite element analysis of the lumbar intervertebral disc--a material sensitivity study.

M J Fagan1, S Julian, D J Siddall, A M Mohsen.   

Abstract

If patient-specific finite element models of the spine could be developed, they would offer enormous opportunities in the diagnosis and management of back problems. Several generic models have been developed in the past, but there has been very little detailed examination of the sensitivity of these models' characteristics to the input parameters. This relationship must be thoroughly understood if representative patient-specific models are to be realized and used with confidence. In particular, the performance of the intervertebral discs are central to any spine model and need detailed investigation first. A generic non-linear model of an intervertebral disc was developed and subjected to compressive, flexion and torsional loading regimes. The effects of both material and geometric non-linearities were investigated for the three loading schemes and the results compared with experimental data. The basic material properties of the fibres, annulus and nucleus were then varied and the effects on the stiffness, annulus bulge and annulus stresses analysed. The results showed that the non-linear geometry assumption had a significant effect on the compression characteristics, whereas the non-linear material option did not. In contrast, the material non-linearity was more important for the flexural and torsional loading schemes. Thus, the inclusion of non-linear material and geometry analysis options in finite element models of intervertebral discs is necessary to predict in vivo load-deflection characteristics accurately. When the influence of the material properties was examined in detail, it was found that the fibre properties did not have a significant effect on the compressive stiffness of the disc but did affect the flexural and torsional stiffnesses by up to +/-20 per cent. All loading modes were sensitive to the annulus properties with stiffnesses varying by up to +/-16 per cent. The model also revealed that for a particular compressive deformation or flexural or torsional rotation, the disc bulge was not sensitive to any of the material properties over the range of properties considered. The annulus stresses did differ significantly as the material properties were varied (up to 70 per cent under a compressive load and 60 per cent during disc flexion).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12365788     DOI: 10.1243/09544110260216577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  16 in total

1.  Injectable silk fibroin/polyurethane composite hydrogel for nucleus pulposus replacement.

Authors:  Jingen Hu; Bin Chen; Fang Guo; Jingyu Du; Pengcheng Gu; Xiangjin Lin; Weiping Yang; Hailong Zhang; Min Lu; Yiping Huang; Gewen Xu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Sensitivity studies of pediatric material properties on juvenile lumbar spine responses using finite element analysis.

Authors:  D Davidson Jebaseelan; C Jebaraj; Narayan Yoganandan; S Rajasekaran; Rishi M Kanna
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Assessing mechanical function of the zygomatic region in macaques: validation and sensitivity testing of finite element models.

Authors:  K Kupczik; C A Dobson; M J Fagan; R H Crompton; C E Oxnard; P O'Higgins
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Locations of bone tissue at high risk of initial failure during compressive loading of the human vertebral body.

Authors:  Senthil K Eswaran; Atul Gupta; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Internal three-dimensional strains in human intervertebral discs under axial compression quantified noninvasively by magnetic resonance imaging and image registration.

Authors:  Jonathon H Yoder; John M Peloquin; Gang Song; Nick J Tustison; Sung M Moon; Alexander C Wright; Edward J Vresilovic; James C Gee; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Human L3L4 intervertebral disc mean 3D shape, modes of variation, and their relationship to degeneration.

Authors:  John M Peloquin; Jonathon H Yoder; Nathan T Jacobs; Sung M Moon; Alexander C Wright; Edward J Vresilovic; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Instability and instrumentation failures after a PSO: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Sebastien Charosky; Pierre Moreno; Philippe Maxy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Mechanisms of initial endplate failure in the human vertebral body.

Authors:  Aaron J Fields; Gideon L Lee; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Parametric equations to represent the profile of the human intervertebral disc in the transverse plane.

Authors:  J Paige Little; M J Pearcy; G J Pettet
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Biomechanical modelling of spinal tumour anisotropic growth.

Authors:  Ioanna Katsamba; Pavlos Evangelidis; Chrysovalantis Voutouri; Alkiviadis Tsamis; Vasileios Vavourakis; Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.