Literature DB >> 22484407

Optimizing parameter choice for FSL-Brain Extraction Tool (BET) on 3D T1 images in multiple sclerosis.

V Popescu1, M Battaglini, W S Hoogstrate, S C J Verfaillie, I C Sluimer, R A van Schijndel, B W van Dijk, K S Cover, D L Knol, M Jenkinson, F Barkhof, N de Stefano, H Vrenken.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brain atrophy studies often use FSL-BET (Brain Extraction Tool) as the first step of image processing. Default BET does not always give satisfactory results on 3DT1 MR images, which negatively impacts atrophy measurements. Finding the right alternative BET settings can be a difficult and time-consuming task, which can introduce unwanted variability. AIM: To systematically analyze the performance of BET in images of MS patients by varying its parameters and options combinations, and quantitatively comparing its results to a manual gold standard.
METHODS: Images from 159 MS patients were selected from different MAGNIMS consortium centers, and 16 different 3DT1 acquisition protocols at 1.5 T or 3T. Before running BET, one of three pre-processing pipelines was applied: (1) no pre-processing, (2) removal of neck slices, or (3) additional N3 inhomogeneity correction. Then BET was applied, systematically varying the fractional intensity threshold (the "f" parameter) and with either one of the main BET options ("B" - bias field correction and neck cleanup, "R" - robust brain center estimation, or "S" - eye and optic nerve cleanup) or none. For comparison, intracranial cavity masks were manually created for all image volumes. FSL-FAST (FMRIB's Automated Segmentation Tool) tissue-type segmentation was run on all BET output images and on the image volumes masked with the manual intracranial cavity masks (thus creating the gold-standard tissue masks). The resulting brain tissue masks were quantitatively compared to the gold standard using Dice overlap coefficient (DOC). Normalized brain volumes (NBV) were calculated with SIENAX. NBV values obtained using for SIENAX other BET settings than default were compared to gold standard NBV with the paired t-test.
RESULTS: The parameter/preprocessing/options combinations resulted in 20,988 BET runs. The median DOC for default BET (f=0.5, g=0) was 0.913 (range 0.321-0.977) across all 159 native scans. For all acquisition protocols, brain extraction was substantially improved for lower values of "f" than the default value. Using native images, optimum BET performance was observed for f=0.2 with option "B", giving median DOC=0.979 (range 0.867-0.994). Using neck removal before BET, optimum BET performance was observed for f=0.1 with option "B", giving median DOC 0.983 (range 0.844-0.996). Using the above BET-options for SIENAX instead of default, the NBV values obtained from images after neck removal with f=0.1 and option "B" did not differ statistically from NBV values obtained with gold-standard.
CONCLUSION: Although default BET performs reasonably well on most 3DT1 images of MS patients, the performance can be improved substantially. The removal of the neck slices, either externally or within BET, has a marked positive effect on the brain extraction quality. BET option "B" with f=0.1 after removal of the neck slices seems to work best for all acquisition protocols.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22484407     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  61 in total

1.  A toolbox for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation.

Authors:  Eloy Roura; Arnau Oliver; Mariano Cabezas; Sergi Valverde; Deborah Pareto; Joan C Vilanova; Lluís Ramió-Torrentà; Àlex Rovira; Xavier Lladó
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  AutoVOI: real-time automatic prescription of volume-of-interest for single voxel spectroscopy.

Authors:  Young Woo Park; Dinesh K Deelchand; James M Joers; Brian Hanna; Adam Berrington; Joseph S Gillen; Kejal Kantarci; Brian J Soher; Peter B Barker; HyunWook Park; Gülin Öz; Christophe Lenglet
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Automated CT-based segmentation and quantification of total intracranial volume.

Authors:  Carlos Aguilar; Kaijsa Edholm; Andrew Simmons; Lena Cavallin; Susanne Muller; Ingmar Skoog; Elna-Marie Larsson; Rimma Axelsson; Lars-Olof Wahlund; Eric Westman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Functional Connectivity of Frontoparietal and Salience/Ventral Attention Networks Have Independent Associations With Co-occurring Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in Children With Autism.

Authors:  Benjamin E Yerys; Birkan Tunç; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Ligia Antezana; Maya G Mosner; Jennifer R Bertollo; Lisa Guy; Robert T Schultz; John D Herrington
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-01-09

5.  State-of-the-Art Traditional to the Machine- and Deep-Learning-Based Skull Stripping Techniques, Models, and Algorithms.

Authors:  Anam Fatima; Ahmad Raza Shahid; Basit Raza; Tahir Mustafa Madni; Uzair Iqbal Janjua
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Postmortem validation of MRI cortical volume measurements in MS.

Authors:  Veronica Popescu; Roel Klaver; Adriaan Versteeg; Pieter Voorn; Jos W R Twisk; Frederik Barkhof; Jeroen J G Geurts; Hugo Vrenken
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Aberrant Salience? Brain Hyperactivation in Response to Pain Onset and Offset in Fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Catherine S Hubbard; Asimina Lazaridou; Christine M Cahalan; Jieun Kim; Robert R Edwards; Vitaly Napadow; Marco L Loggia
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 10.995

8.  Within-patient fluctuation of brain volume estimates from short-term repeated MRI measurements using SIENA/FSL.

Authors:  Roland Opfer; Ann-Christin Ostwaldt; Christine Walker-Egger; Praveena Manogaran; Maria Pia Sormani; Nicola De Stefano; Sven Schippling
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Intergroup social influence on emotion processing in the brain.

Authors:  Lynda C Lin; Yang Qu; Eva H Telzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Quantitative assessment of subcortical atrophy and iron content in progressive supranuclear palsy and parkinsonian variant of multiple system atrophy.

Authors:  Jae-Hyeok Lee; Yong-Hee Han; Bok-Man Kang; Chi-Woong Mun; Sang-Jae Lee; Seung-Kug Baik
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.