Literature DB >> 32666364

State-of-the-Art Traditional to the Machine- and Deep-Learning-Based Skull Stripping Techniques, Models, and Algorithms.

Anam Fatima1, Ahmad Raza Shahid1, Basit Raza2, Tahir Mustafa Madni1, Uzair Iqbal Janjua1.   

Abstract

Several neuroimaging processing applications consider skull stripping as a crucial pre-processing step. Due to complex anatomical brain structure and intensity variations in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), an appropriate skull stripping is an important part. The process of skull stripping basically deals with the removal of the skull region for clinical analysis in brain segmentation tasks, and its accuracy and efficiency are quite crucial for diagnostic purposes. It requires more accurate and detailed methods for differentiating brain regions and the skull regions and is considered as a challenging task. This paper is focused on the transition of the conventional to the machine- and deep-learning-based automated skull stripping methods for brain MRI images. It is observed in this study that deep learning approaches have outperformed conventional and machine learning techniques in many ways, but they have their limitations. It also includes the comparative analysis of the current state-of-the-art skull stripping methods, a critical discussion of some challenges, model of quantifying parameters, and future work directions.

Keywords:  Brain extraction; Conventional skull stripping methods; Deep learning skull stripping methods; MRI; Machine learning skull stripping methods; Skull stripping

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32666364      PMCID: PMC7728893          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-020-00367-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  60 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance image tissue classification using a partial volume model.

Authors:  D W Shattuck; S R Sandor-Leahy; K A Schaper; D A Rottenberg; R M Leahy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  MR imaging of the brain: what constitutes the minimum acceptable capability?

Authors:  R M Quencer; W G Bradley
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Segmentation of brain 3D MR images using level sets and dense registration.

Authors:  C Baillard; P Hellier; C Barillot
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  BEaST: brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique.

Authors:  Simon F Eskildsen; Pierrick Coupé; Vladimir Fonov; José V Manjón; Kelvin K Leung; Nicolas Guizard; Shafik N Wassef; Lasse Riis Østergaard; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction.

Authors:  A M Dale; B Fischl; M I Sereno
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods.

Authors:  Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Cheng-Yi Liu; Paul M Thompson; Zhuowen Tu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Abstinence syndrome from therapeutic doses of oxazepam.

Authors:  R Wilbur; A V Kulik
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.356

8.  Quantitative Comparison of SPM, FSL, and Brainsuite for Brain MR Image Segmentation.

Authors:  K Kazemi; N Noorizadeh
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2014-03-08

9.  Quantitative evaluation of robust skull stripping and tumor detection applied to axial MR images.

Authors:  Ahmad Chaddad; Camel Tanougast
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2016-02-01

Review 10.  Deep Learning for Brain MRI Segmentation: State of the Art and Future Directions.

Authors:  Zeynettin Akkus; Alfiia Galimzianova; Assaf Hoogi; Daniel L Rubin; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  5 in total

1.  Automated 2D Slice-Based Skull Stripping Multi-View Ensemble Model on NFBS and IBSR Datasets.

Authors:  Anam Fatima; Tahir Mustafa Madni; Fozia Anwar; Uzair Iqbal Janjua; Nasira Sultana
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Extraction of region of interest from brain MRI by converting images into neutrosophic domain using the modified S-function.

Authors:  Zahid Tufail; Ahmad Raza Shahid; Basit Raza; Tahir Akram; Uzair Iqbal Janjua
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-02-08

3.  3D U-Net Improves Automatic Brain Extraction for Isotropic Rat Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.

Authors:  Li-Ming Hsu; Shuai Wang; Lindsay Walton; Tzu-Wen Winnie Wang; Sung-Ho Lee; Yen-Yu Ian Shih
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  Where Is the Artificial Intelligence Applied in Dentistry? Systematic Review and Literature Analysis.

Authors:  Andrej Thurzo; Wanda Urbanová; Bohuslav Novák; Ladislav Czako; Tomáš Siebert; Peter Stano; Simona Mareková; Georgia Fountoulaki; Helena Kosnáčová; Ivan Varga
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-08

5.  SynthStrip: skull-stripping for any brain image.

Authors:  Andrew Hoopes; Jocelyn S Mora; Adrian V Dalca; Bruce Fischl; Malte Hoffmann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 7.400

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.