Literature DB >> 22476214

Vection can be induced in the absence of explicit motion stimuli.

Takeharu Seno1, Hiroyuki Ito, Shoji Sunaga.   

Abstract

The present study utilized two separate experiments to demonstrate that illusory self-motion (vection) can be induced/modulated by cognition. In the first experiment, two curved lines, which simulated road edges seen while driving at night, were employed. Although the lines induced adequate strength of forward vection, when one of the lines was horizontally reversed, vection was significantly reduced. In the second experiment, two static converging lines with moving characters, which simulated side edges of a straight road with a traffic sign, were utilized. The road sign moved only during the first 5 s. After the sign disappeared, only static lines or a blank screen were able to induce vection. These results suggested that vection was largely affected by cognitive factors and that vection could be induced by implicit motion stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22476214     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3083-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  26 in total

1.  Attentional modulation of self-motion perception.

Authors:  Michiteru Kitazaki; Takao Sato
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Neural correlates of implied motion.

Authors:  Bart Krekelberg; Sabine Dannenberg; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; Frank Bremmer; John Ross
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Independent modulation of motion and vection aftereffects revealed by using coherent oscillation and random jitter in optic flow.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Stephen Palmisano; Hiroyuki Ito
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Inhibition of vection by red.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Shoji Sunaga; Hiroyuki Ito
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Jitter and size effects on vection are immune to experimental instructions and demands.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Amy Y C Chan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  The object and background hypothesis for vection.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Hiroyuki Ito; Shoji Sunaga
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Auditorily-induced illusory self-motion: a review.

Authors:  Aleksander Väljamäe
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2009-07-18

8.  Cognitive effects on visually induced body motion in children.

Authors:  J C Lepecq; I Giannopulu; P M Baudonniere
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction. Visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex.

Authors:  T Brandt; P Bartenstein; A Janek; M Dieterich
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Neural correlates of visual-motion perception as object- or self-motion.

Authors:  Andreas Kleinschmidt; Kai V Thilo; Christian Büchel; Michael A Gresty; Adolfo M Bronstein; Richard S J Frackowiak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Shepard-Risset glissando: music that moves you.

Authors:  Rebecca A Mursic; Bernhard E Riecke; Deborah Apthorp; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The influence of imagery vividness on cognitive and perceptual cues in circular auditorily-induced vection.

Authors:  Aleksander Väljamäe; Sara Sell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-03

Review 3.  Future challenges for vection research: definitions, functional significance, measures, and neural bases.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Robert S Allison; Mark M Schira; Robert J Barry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.