Literature DB >> 12904793

Neural correlates of implied motion.

Bart Krekelberg1, Sabine Dannenberg, Klaus-Peter Hoffmann, Frank Bremmer, John Ross.   

Abstract

Current views of the visual system assume that the primate brain analyses form and motion along largely independent pathways; they provide no insight into why form is sometimes interpreted as motion. In a series of psychophysical and electrophysiological experiments in humans and macaques, here we show that some form information is processed in the prototypical motion areas of the superior temporal sulcus (STS). First, we show that STS cells respond to dynamic Glass patterns, which contain no coherent motion but suggest a path of motion. Second, we show that when motion signals conflict with form signals suggesting a different path of motion, both humans and monkeys perceive motion in a compromised direction. This compromise also has a correlate in the responses of STS cells, which alter their direction preferences in the presence of conflicting implied motion information. We conclude that cells in the prototypical motion areas in the dorsal visual cortex process form that implies motion. Estimating motion by combining motion cues with form cues may be a strategy to deal with the complexities of motion perception in our natural environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12904793     DOI: 10.1038/nature01852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  35 in total

1.  Long- and short-term plastic modeling of action prediction abilities in volleyball.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Maria Maddalena Savonitto; Franco Fabbro; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-02

2.  Vection can be induced in the absence of explicit motion stimuli.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Hiroyuki Ito; Shoji Sunaga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation over MT/MST fails to impair judgments of implied motion.

Authors:  James L Alford; Paul van Donkelaar; Paul Dassonville; Richard T Marrocco
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The segregation and integration of colour in motion processing revealed by motion after-effects.

Authors:  D J McKeefry; E G Laviers; P V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A cerebellar model for predictive motor control tested in a brain-based device.

Authors:  Jeffrey L McKinstry; Gerald M Edelman; Jeffrey L Krichmar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Motion-form interactions beyond the motion integration level: evidence for interactions between orientation and optic flow signals.

Authors:  Andrea Pavan; Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti; George Mather
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Distinct effects of attention on the neural responses to form and motion processing: a SSVEP source-imaging study.

Authors:  Melanie Palomares; Justin M Ales; Alex R Wade; Benoit R Cottereau; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Time perception of action photographs is more precise than that of still photographs.

Authors:  Alessandro Moscatelli; Laura Polito; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Efficiency of extracting stereo-driven object motions.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Apparent speed increases at low luminance.

Authors:  Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.