Literature DB >> 22476212

Queen reproductive state modulates pheromone production and queen-worker interactions in honeybees.

Sarah D Kocher1, Freddie-Jeanne Richard, David R Tarpy, Christina M Grozinger.   

Abstract

The mandibular glands of queen honeybees produce a pheromone that modulates many aspects of worker honeybee physiology and behavior and is critical for colony social organization. The exact chemical blend produced by the queen differs between virgin and mated, laying queens. Here, we investigate the role of mating and reproductive state on queen pheromone production and worker responses. Virgin queens, naturally mated queens, and queens instrumentally inseminated with either semen or saline were collected 2 days after mating or insemination. Naturally mated queens had the most activated ovaries and the most distinct chemical profile in their mandibular glands. Instrumentally inseminated queens were intermediate between virgins and naturally mated queens for both ovary activation and chemical profiles. There were no significant differences between semen- and saline-inseminated queens. Workers were preferentially attracted to the mandibular gland extracts from queens with significantly more activated ovaries. These studies suggest that the queen pheromone blend is modulated by the reproductive status of the queens, and workers can detect these subtle differences and are more responsive to queens with higher reproductive potential. Furthermore, it appears as if insemination substance does not strongly affect physiological characteristics of honeybee queens 2 days after insemination, suggesting that the insemination process or volume is responsible for stimulating these early postmating changes in honeybee queens.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 22476212      PMCID: PMC2744121          DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Ecol        ISSN: 1045-2249            Impact factor:   2.671


  16 in total

Review 1.  Primer pheromones in social hymenoptera.

Authors:  Yves Le Conte; Abraham Hefetz
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  New components of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen retinue pheromone.

Authors:  Christopher I Keeling; Keith N Slessor; Heather A Higo; Mark L Winston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  No Behavioral Control over Mating Frequency in Queen Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.): Implications for the Evolution of Extreme Polyandry.

Authors:  D R Tarpy; R E Page
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Switchover to the mated state by spermathecal activation in female Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes.

Authors:  Marc J Klowden
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 2.354

5.  Pheromonal regulation of starvation resistance in honey bee workers (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Patrick Fischer; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-04-15

6.  Semiochemicals of the honeybee queen mandibular glands.

Authors:  K N Slessor; L A Kaminski; G G King; M L Winston
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 7.  "S.P.E.R.M." (seminal proteins (are) essential reproductive modulators): the view from Drosophila.

Authors:  M F Wolfner
Journal:  Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl       Date:  2007

8.  Aggressive reproductive competition among hopelessly queenless honeybee workers triggered by pheromone signaling.

Authors:  O Malka; S Shnieor; T Katzav-Gozansky; A Hefetz
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-03-05

9.  Effects of insemination quantity on honey bee queen physiology.

Authors:  Freddie-Jeanne Richard; David R Tarpy; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genomic analysis of post-mating changes in the honey bee queen (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Sarah D Kocher; Freddie-Jeanne Richard; David R Tarpy; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  22 in total

1.  Identification of an ant queen pheromone regulating worker sterility.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Charlotte G Jørgensen; John Nielsen; Patrizia d'Ettorre
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A conserved class of queen pheromones? Re-evaluating the evidence in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens).

Authors:  Etya Amsalem; Margarita Orlova; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Do Bumble Bee, Bombus impatiens, Queens Signal their Reproductive and Mating Status to their Workers?

Authors:  Etya Amsalem; Mario Padilla; Paul M Schreiber; Naomi S Altman; Abraham Hefetz; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 4.  Cooperation, conflict, and the evolution of queen pheromones.

Authors:  Sarah D Kocher; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Social molecular pathways and the evolution of bee societies.

Authors:  Guy Bloch; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Effects of instrumental insemination and insemination quantity on Dufour's gland chemical profiles and vitellogenin expression in honey bee queens (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Freddie-Jeanne Richard; Coby Schal; David R Tarpy; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  How flies respond to honey bee pheromone: the role of the foraging gene on reproductive response to queen mandibular pheromone.

Authors:  Alison L Camiletti; David N Awde; Graham J Thompson
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-12-10

8.  The effects of mating and instrumental insemination on queen honey bee flight behaviour and gene expression.

Authors:  S D Kocher; D R Tarpy; C M Grozinger
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.585

9.  New insights into honey bee (Apis mellifera) pheromone communication. Is the queen mandibular pheromone alone in colony regulation?

Authors:  Alban Maisonnasse; Cédric Alaux; Dominique Beslay; Didier Crauser; Christian Gines; Erika Plettner; Yves Le Conte
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Seminal fluid compromises visual perception in honeybee queens reducing their survival during additional mating flights.

Authors:  Joanito Liberti; Julia Görner; Mat Welch; Ryan Dosselli; Morten Schiøtt; Yuri Ogawa; Ian Castleden; Jan M Hemmi; Barbara Baer-Imhoof; Jacobus J Boomsma; Boris Baer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.