Literature DB >> 28647839

Do Bumble Bee, Bombus impatiens, Queens Signal their Reproductive and Mating Status to their Workers?

Etya Amsalem1, Mario Padilla2, Paul M Schreiber2, Naomi S Altman3, Abraham Hefetz4, Christina M Grozinger2.   

Abstract

Reproduction in social insect societies reflects a delicate balance between cooperation and conflict over offspring production, and worker reproduction is widespread even in species showing strong reproductive skew in favor of the queen. To navigate these conflicts, workers are predicted to develop the means to estimate the queen's fecundity - potentially through behavioral and/or chemical cues - and to adjust their reproduction to maximize their fitness. Here, we introduced bumble bee, Bombus impatiens, workers to queens of different mating and reproductive status and examined worker reproduction and expression levels of two genes which were previously shown to be sensitive to the presence of the queen, vitellogenin and Krüppel-homolog 1. We further explored whether the queen's chemical secretion alone is sufficient to regulate worker reproduction, aggression and gene expression. We found that worker ovary activation was inhibited only in the presence of egg-laying queens, regardless of their mating status. Workers reared in the presence of newly-mated queens showed intermediate vitellogenin expression levels relative to workers reared with mated egg-laying and virgin queens. However, none of the whole-body chemical extracts of any of the queen treatment groups affected ovary activation, aggressive behavior, or gene expression in workers. Our findings indicate that only the presence of a freely-behaving, egg-laying queen can fully inhibit worker reproduction. It remains to be determined if workers detect differences in queen mating status and fecundity through differences in the queens' behavior alone or through the queen's behavior in concert with fertility signals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aggression; Gene expression; Pheromones; Reproduction; Signals

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28647839     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-017-0858-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  28 in total

1.  A conserved class of queen pheromones? Re-evaluating the evidence in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens).

Authors:  Etya Amsalem; Margarita Orlova; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Cooperation, conflict, and the evolution of queen pheromones.

Authors:  Sarah D Kocher; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  The transcription factor Krüppel homolog 1 is linked to hormone mediated social organization in bees.

Authors:  Hagai Shpigler; Harland M Patch; Mira Cohen; Yongliang Fan; Christina M Grozinger; Guy Bloch
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Reproductive conflict in bumblebees and the evolution of worker policing.

Authors:  Lorenzo R S Zanette; Sophie D L Miller; Christiana M A Faria; Edd J Almond; Tim J Huggins; William C Jordan; Andrew F G Bourke
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Genetic diversity in honey bee colonies enhances productivity and fitness.

Authors:  Heather R Mattila; Thomas D Seeley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Conservation and modification of genetic and physiological toolkits underpinning diapause in bumble bee queens.

Authors:  Etya Amsalem; David A Galbraith; Jonathan Cnaani; Peter E A Teal; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  The effect of group size on the interplay between dominance and reproduction in Bombus terrestris.

Authors:  Etya Amsalem; Abraham Hefetz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Queen signals in a stingless bee: suppression of worker ovary activation and spatial distribution of active compounds.

Authors:  Túlio M Nunes; Sidnei Mateus; Arodi P Favaris; Mônica F Z J Amaral; Lucas G von Zuben; Giuliano C Clososki; José M S Bento; Benjamin P Oldroyd; Ricardo Silva; Ronaldo Zucchi; Denise B Silva; Norberto P Lopes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Gene Expression Dynamics in Major Endocrine Regulatory Pathways along the Transition from Solitary to Social Life in a Bumblebee, Bombus terrestris.

Authors:  Pavel Jedlička; Ulrich R Ernst; Alena Votavová; Robert Hanus; Irena Valterová
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Effects of insemination quantity on honey bee queen physiology.

Authors:  Freddie-Jeanne Richard; David R Tarpy; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Queen Recognition Signals in Two Primitively Eusocial Halictid Bees: Evolutionary Conservation and Caste-Specific Perception.

Authors:  Iris Steitz; Katharina Brandt; Felix Biefel; Ädem Minat; Manfred Ayasse
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.769

Review 2.  Genetic basis of chemical communication in eusocial insects.

Authors:  Hua Yan; Jürgen Liebig
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Chemical Variation among Castes, Female Life Stages and Populations of the Facultative Eusocial Sweat Bee Halictus rubicundus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae).

Authors:  Iris Steitz; Robert J Paxton; Stefan Schulz; Manfred Ayasse
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  The effect of the brood and the queen on early gene expression in bumble bee workers' brains.

Authors:  Priscila K F Santos; David A Galbraith; Jesse Starkey; Etya Amsalem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  An organizing feature of bumble bee life history: worker emergence promotes queen reproduction and survival in young nests.

Authors:  Erica Sarro; Penglin Sun; Kerry Mauck; Damaris Rodriguez-Arellano; Naoki Yamanaka; S Hollis Woodard
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.079

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.