Literature DB >> 26490791

A conserved class of queen pheromones? Re-evaluating the evidence in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens).

Etya Amsalem1, Margarita Orlova2, Christina M Grozinger3.   

Abstract

The regulation of reproductive division of labour is a key component in the evolution of social insects. Chemical signals are important mechanisms to regulate worker reproduction, either as queen-produced pheromones that coercively inhibit worker reproduction or as queen signals that honestly advertise her fecundity. A recent study suggested that a conserved class of hydrocarbons serve as queen pheromones across three independent origins of eusociality. In bumblebees (Bombus terrestris), pentacosane (C25) was suggested to serve as a queen pheromone. Here, we repeat these studies using a different species of bumblebee (Bombus impatiens) with a more controlled experimental design. Instead of dequeened colonies, we used same-aged, three-worker queenless groups comprising either experienced or naive workers (with/without adult exposure to queen pheromone). We quantified three hydrocarbons (C23, C25 and C27) on the cuticular surfaces of females and tested their effects on the two worker types. Our results indicate differences in responses of naive and experienced workers, genetic effects on worker reproduction, and general effects of hydrocarbons and duration of egg laying on ovary resorption rates. However, we found no evidence to support the theory that a conserved class of hydrocarbons serve as queen pheromones or queen signals in Bombus impatiens.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bombus impatiens; bumblebees; hydrocarbons; pheromones; reproduction; social insects

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26490791      PMCID: PMC4633876          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  28 in total

1.  Caste Determination in Bombus terrestris: Differences in Development and Rates of JH Biosynthesis between Queen and Worker Larvae.

Authors:  A HEFETZ; G E. ROBINSON; Z -Y. HUANG; D W. BORST; J CNAANI
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.354

Review 2.  Pheromones and signature mixtures: defining species-wide signals and variable cues for identity in both invertebrates and vertebrates.

Authors:  Tristram D Wyatt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Primer pheromones in social hymenoptera.

Authors:  Yves Le Conte; Abraham Hefetz
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 19.686

4.  The evolution of pheromone diversity.

Authors:  Matthew R E Symonds; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Queen reproductive state modulates pheromone production and queen-worker interactions in honeybees.

Authors:  Sarah D Kocher; Freddie-Jeanne Richard; David R Tarpy; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 2.671

Review 6.  Cooperation, conflict, and the evolution of queen pheromones.

Authors:  Sarah D Kocher; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Reproductive conflict in bumblebees and the evolution of worker policing.

Authors:  Lorenzo R S Zanette; Sophie D L Miller; Christiana M A Faria; Edd J Almond; Tim J Huggins; William C Jordan; Andrew F G Bourke
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Reproductive competition in the bumble-bee Bombus terrestris: do workers advertise sterility?

Authors:  Etya Amsalem; Robert Twele; Wittko Francke; Abraham Hefetz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Semiochemicals of the honeybee queen mandibular glands.

Authors:  K N Slessor; L A Kaminski; G G King; M L Winston
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  The effect of group size on the interplay between dominance and reproduction in Bombus terrestris.

Authors:  Etya Amsalem; Abraham Hefetz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  Do Bumble Bee, Bombus impatiens, Queens Signal their Reproductive and Mating Status to their Workers?

Authors:  Etya Amsalem; Mario Padilla; Paul M Schreiber; Naomi S Altman; Abraham Hefetz; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Conservation of Queen Pheromones Across Two Species of Vespine Wasps.

Authors:  Cintia A Oi; Jocelyn G Millar; Jelle S van Zweden; Tom Wenseleers
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Reproductive Dominance Strategies in Insect Social Parasites.

Authors:  Patrick Lhomme; Heather M Hines
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 4.  Chemical Communication and Reproduction Partitioning in Social Wasps.

Authors:  Francesca Romana Dani; Stefano Turillazzi
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Preface: Pheromone-Mediation of Female Reproduction and Reproductive Dominance in Social Species.

Authors:  Etya Amsalem; Abraham Hefetz
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Chemical Characterization of Young Virgin Queens and Mated Egg-Laying Queens in the Ant Cataglyphis cursor: Random Forest Classification Analysis for Multivariate Datasets.

Authors:  Thibaud Monnin; Florence Helft; Chloé Leroy; Patrizia d'Ettorre; Claudie Doums
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Chemical Heterogeneity in Inbred European Population of the Invasive Hornet Vespa velutina nigrithorax.

Authors:  J Gévar; A-G Bagnères; J-P Christidès; E Darrouzet
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 8.  Bombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Microcolonies as a Tool for Biological Understanding and Pesticide Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Ellen G Klinger; Allison A Camp; James P Strange; Diana Cox-Foster; David M Lehmann
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.387

9.  Chemical communication is not sufficient to explain reproductive inhibition in the bumblebee Bombus impatiens.

Authors:  Mario Padilla; Etya Amsalem; Naomi Altman; Abraham Hefetz; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Conserved queen pheromones in bumblebees: a reply to Amsalem et al.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Jelle S van Zweden; Ricardo C Oliveira; Annette van Oystaeyen; Tom Wenseleers
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.