Literature DB >> 24323176

How flies respond to honey bee pheromone: the role of the foraging gene on reproductive response to queen mandibular pheromone.

Alison L Camiletti1, David N Awde, Graham J Thompson.   

Abstract

In this study we test one central prediction from sociogenomic theory--that social and non-social taxa share common genetic toolkits that regulate reproduction in response to environmental cues. We exposed Drosophila females of rover (for(R)) and sitter (for(s)) genotypes to an ovary-suppressing pheromone derived from the honeybee Apis mellifera. Surprisingly, queen mandibular pheromone (QMP) affected several measures of fitness in flies, and in a manner comparable to the pheromone's normal effect on bee workers. QMP-treated sitter flies had smaller ovaries that contained fewer eggs than did untreated controls. QMP-treated rover flies, by contrast, showed a more variable pattern that only sometimes resulted in ovary inhibition, while a third strain of fly that contains a sitter mutant allele in a rover background (for(s2)) showed no ovarian response to QMP. Taken together, our results suggest that distinctly non-social insects have some capacity to respond to social cues, but that this response varies with fly genotype. In general, the interspecific response is consistent with a conserved gene set affecting reproductive physiology. The differential response among strains in particular suggests that for is itself important for modulating the fly's pheromonal response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24323176     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-013-1125-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  34 in total

1.  Deconstructing the superorganism: social physiology, groundplans, and sociogenomics.

Authors:  Brian R Johnson; Timothy A Linksvayer
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Natural variation in food acquisition mediated via a Drosophila cGMP-dependent protein kinase.

Authors:  Karla R Kaun; Craig A L Riedl; Munmun Chakaborty-Chatterjee; Amsale T Belay; Scott J Douglas; Allen G Gibbs; Marla B Sokolowski
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 3.  The validity and value of inclusive fitness theory.

Authors:  Andrew F G Bourke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  cGMP modulates responses to queen mandibular pheromone in worker honey bees.

Authors:  Brendon L Fussnecker; Alexander M McKenzie; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Evolution of foraging behaviour in response to chronic malnutrition in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Roshan K Vijendravarma; Sunitha Narasimha; Tadeusz J Kawecki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Pleiotropy, epistasis and new QTL: the genetic architecture of honey bee foraging behavior.

Authors:  O Rüppell; T Pankiw; R E Page
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 7.  Evo-devo and the evolution of social behavior.

Authors:  Amy L Toth; Gene E Robinson
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Mutations in the larval foraging gene affect adult locomotory behavior after feeding in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  H S Pereira; M B Sokolowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Honey bee PTEN--description, developmental knockdown, and tissue-specific expression of splice-variants correlated with alternative social phenotypes.

Authors:  Navdeep S Mutti; Ying Wang; Osman Kaftanoglu; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Nuclear receptors of the honey bee: annotation and expression in the adult brain.

Authors:  Rodrigo A Velarde; Gene E Robinson; Susan E Fahrbach
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.585

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sexual response of male Drosophila to honey bee queen mandibular pheromone: implications for genetic studies of social insects.

Authors:  Justin R Croft; Tom Liu; Alison L Camiletti; Anne F Simon; Graham J Thompson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  A novel screen for genes associated with pheromone-induced sterility.

Authors:  Alison L Camiletti; Anthony Percival-Smith; Justin R Croft; Graham J Thompson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Neonicotinoid-induced pathogen susceptibility is mitigated by Lactobacillus plantarum immune stimulation in a Drosophila melanogaster model.

Authors:  Brendan A Daisley; Mark Trinder; Tim W McDowell; Hylke Welle; Josh S Dube; Sohrab N Ali; Hon S Leong; Mark W Sumarah; Gregor Reid
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The foraging gene affects alcohol sensitivity, metabolism and memory in Drosophila.

Authors:  Anne S Oepen; Jamie L Catalano; Reza Azanchi; Karla R Kaun
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 1.696

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.