Literature DB >> 27251007

Survey of motivation to participate in a birth cohort.

Midori Yamamoto1,2, Misuzu Fujita2, Chisato Mori1,3, Akira Hata1,2.   

Abstract

For a longitudinal prospective cohort study to be successful, participants' motivation to provide information must be maintained. Therefore, this study aimed to identify items that effectively promote participants' motivation. Questionnaires were mailed to 4541 mothers and expectant mothers in Chiba Prefecture, Japan who participated in a nationwide birth cohort. A total of 2387 (52.6%) responses were received. The following items were identified as primary motivating factors among our cohort: "benefits to the participants' children", "monetary compensation" and "contribution to a better future environment". More than 30% of the respondents expressed a lack of understanding regarding the study purpose and requirements for participation. About 14% were concerned about the leakage of personal information, and 13% felt burdened by having to make a long-term commitment to the study. Cluster analysis identified four groups, two of which, one with extremely low levels of motivation and the other motivated by only money or goods, lacked an understanding of the study and tended to be concerned about the associated risks and burdens. Participants in these groups were considered to be at a high risk of dropout. Therefore, implementing measures to provide participants with a better understanding of cohort studies could lead to more successful results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27251007     DOI: 10.1038/jhg.2016.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1434-5161            Impact factor:   3.172


  19 in total

1.  Attitudes toward participation in a pregnancy and child cohort study.

Authors:  Julie L Daniels; David A Savitz; Chyrise Bradley; Nancy Dole; Kelly R Evenson; Barbara Eucker; Amy H Herring; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; John M Thorp
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Birth cohort studies: past, present and future.

Authors:  Debbie A Lawlor; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen; G David Batty
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Qualitative assessment of study materials and communication strategies used in studies that include DNA collection.

Authors:  Mary M Jenkins; Erika Reed-Gross; Wanda D Barfield; Christine E Prue; Margaret L Gallagher; Sonja A Rasmussen; Margaret A Honein
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli Murphy-Bollinger; Joan Scott; Kathy L Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Factors affecting maternal participation in the genetic component of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study-United States, 1997-2007.

Authors:  Jill Glidewell; Jennita Reefhuis; Sonja A Rasmussen; Alison Woomert; Charlotte Hobbs; Paul A Romitti; Krista S Crider
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  "Do I really want to do this?" Longitudinal cohort study participants' perspectives on postal survey design: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Helen Harcombe; Sarah Derrett; Peter Herbison; David McBride
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Rationale and study design of the Japan environment and children's study (JECS).

Authors:  Toshihiro Kawamoto; Hiroshi Nitta; Katsuyuki Murata; Eisaku Toda; Naoya Tsukamoto; Manabu Hasegawa; Zentaro Yamagata; Fujio Kayama; Reiko Kishi; Yukihiro Ohya; Hirohisa Saito; Haruhiko Sago; Makiko Okuyama; Tsutomu Ogata; Susumu Yokoya; Yuji Koresawa; Yasuyuki Shibata; Shoji Nakayama; Takehiro Michikawa; Ayano Takeuchi; Hiroshi Satoh
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository.

Authors:  Erin D Harris; Sonja I Ziniel; Jonathan G Amatruda; Catherine M Clinton; Sarah K Savage; Patrick L Taylor; Noelle L Huntington; Robert C Green; Ingrid A Holm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Analysis of motivations that lead women to participate (or not) in a newborn cohort study.

Authors:  Liza Vecchi Brumatti; Marcella Montico; Stefano Russian; Veronica Tognin; Maura Bin; Fabio Barbone; Patrizia Volpi; Luca Ronfani
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  The Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS): A Preliminary Report on Selected Characteristics of Approximately 10 000 Pregnant Women Recruited During the First Year of the Study.

Authors:  Takehiro Michikawa; Hiroshi Nitta; Shoji F Nakayama; Masaji Ono; Junzo Yonemoto; Kenji Tamura; Eiko Suda; Hiroyasu Ito; Ayano Takeuchi; Toshihiro Kawamoto
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.211

View more
  2 in total

1.  "Telling" and assent: Parents' attitudes towards children's participation in a birth cohort study.

Authors:  Izen Ri; Eiko Suda; Zentaro Yamagata; Hiroshi Nitta; Kaori Muto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Experiences of parents whose children participated in a longitudinal follow-up study.

Authors:  Nike Franke; Jennifer Rogers; Trecia Wouldes; Kim Ward; Gavin Brown; Monique Jonas; Peter Keegan; Jane Harding
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.318

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.