Literature DB >> 22464352

Quality improvement in cancer symptom assessment and control: the Provincial Palliative Care Integration Project (PPCIP).

Julie E Gilbert1, Doris Howell, Susan King, Carol Sawka, Erin Hughes, Helen Angus, Deborah Dudgeon.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The Provincial Palliative Care Integration Project (PPCIP) was implemented in Ontario, Canada, to enhance the quality of palliative care delivery. The PPCIP promoted collaboration and integration across service sectors to improve screening and assessment, palliative care processes, as well as clinician practice and outcomes for cancer patients.
OBJECTIVES: The project involved 1) implementation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) for symptom screening, 2) use of "rapid-cycle change" quality improvement processes to improve screening and symptom management, and 3) improvements in integration and access to palliative care services.
METHODS: Symptom scores were collected and made accessible to the care team through a web-based tool and kiosk technology, which helped patients enter their ESAS scores at each visit to the regional cancer center or at home with their nurse. Symptom response data were gathered through clinical chart audits.
RESULTS: Within one year of implementation, regional cancer centers saw improvements in symptom screening (54% of lung cancer patients), symptom control (69% of patients with pain scores and 31% of patients with dyspnea scores seven or more were reduced to six or less within 72 hours), and functional assessment (23% of all patients and 64% of palliative care clinic patients). ESAS screening rates reached 29%, and functional assessment reached 26% of targeted home care patients.
CONCLUSION: The PPCIP demonstrated that significant strides in symptom screening and response can be achieved within a year using rapid-cycle change and collaborative approaches. It showed that both short- and long-term improvement require ongoing facilitation to embed the changes in system design and change the culture of clinical practice.
Copyright © 2012 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22464352     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  22 in total

1.  Orphan symptoms in advanced cancer patients followed at home.

Authors:  Sebastiano Mercadante; Giampiero Porzio; Alessandro Valle; Flavio Fusco; Federica Aielli; Claudio Adile; Alessandra Casuccio
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-10-13       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Factors associated with receipt of symptom screening in the year after cancer diagnosis in a universal health care system: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  A L Mahar; L E Davis; L D Bubis; Q Li; R Sutradhar; N G Coburn; L Barbera
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Attitudes of oncologists towards palliative care and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at an Ontario cancer center in Canada.

Authors:  Martin Chasen; Ravi Bhargava; Catherine Dalzell; José Luis Pereira
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Incorporating the patient's voice into electronic health records through patient-reported outcomes as the "review of systems".

Authors:  Arlene E Chung; Ethan M Basch
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Allison M Deal; Mark G Kris; Howard I Scher; Clifford A Hudis; Paul Sabbatini; Lauren Rogak; Antonia V Bennett; Amylou C Dueck; Thomas M Atkinson; Joanne F Chou; Dorothy Dulko; Laura Sit; Allison Barz; Paul Novotny; Michael Fruscione; Jeff A Sloan; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A randomized trial of the electronic Lung Cancer Symptom Scale for quality-of-life assessment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J C Kuo; D M Graham; A Salvarrey; F Kassam; L W Le; F A Shepherd; R Burkes; P J Hollen; R J Gralla; N B Leighl
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Symptom prevalence in lung and colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Anne M Walling; Jane C Weeks; Katherine L Kahn; Diana Tisnado; Nancy L Keating; Sydney M Dy; Neeraj K Arora; Jennifer W Mack; Philip M Pantoja; Jennifer L Malin
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Feasibility and clinical impact of sharing patient-reported symptom toxicities and performance status with clinical investigators during a phase 2 cancer treatment trial.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; William A Wood; Deborah Schrag; Camelia S Sima; Mary Shaw; Lauren J Rogak; Mark G Kris; Marwan Shouery; Antonia Bennett; Thomas Atkinson; M Catherine Pietanza
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  The impact of automated screening with Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) on health-related quality of life, supportive care needs, and patient satisfaction with care in 268 ambulatory cancer patients.

Authors:  Benjamin D Diplock; Kaitlin M C McGarragle; Willem A Mueller; Sana Haddad; Rachel Ehrlich; Dong-Hyun A Yoon; Xingshan Cao; Yaseen Al-Allaq; Paul Karanicolas; Margaret I Fitch; Jeff Myers; Alex J Mitchell; Janet W M Ellis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Does a regional comprehensive palliative care program improve pain in outpatient cancer patients?

Authors:  Tatsuya Morita; Kazuki Sato; Mitsunori Miyashita; Akemi Yamagishi; Yoshiyuki Kizawa; Yasuo Shima; Hiroya Kinoshita; Satoshi Suzuki; Yutaka Shirahige; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Kenji Eguchi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.