J C Kuo1,2, D M Graham1,3, A Salvarrey1, F Kassam1,4, L W Le1, F A Shepherd1, R Burkes5, P J Hollen6, R J Gralla7, N B Leighl1. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON. 2. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 3. Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, U.K. 4. Division of Medical Oncology, Southlake Regional Cancer Centre, Newmarket, ON. 5. Division of Medical Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON. 6. School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, U.S.A. 7. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, U.S.A.
Abstract
Introduction: Improving health-related quality of life (hrqol) is a key goal of systemic therapy in advanced lung cancer, although routine assessment remains challenging. We analyzed the impact of a real-time electronic hrqol tool, the electronic Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (elcss-ql), on palliative care (pc) referral rates, patterns of chemotherapy treatment, and use of other supportive interventions in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) receiving first-line chemotherapy. Methods:Patients with advanced nsclc starting first-line chemotherapy were randomized to their oncologist receiving or not receiving their elcss-ql data before each clinic visit. Patients completed the elcss-ql at baseline, before each chemotherapy cycle, and at subsequent follow-up visits until disease progression. Prospective data about the pc referral rate, hrqol, and use of other supportive interventions were collected. Results: For the 95 patients with advanced nsclc who participated, oncologists received real-time elcss-ql data for 44 (elcss-ql arm) and standard clinical assessment alone for 51 (standard arm). The primary endpoint, the pc referral rate, was numerically higher, but statistically similar, for patients in the elcss-ql and standard arms. The hrqol scores over time were not significantly different between the two study arms. Conclusions: The elcss-ql is feasible as a tool for use in routine clinical practice, although no statistically significant effect of its use was demonstrated in our study. Improving access to supportive care through the collection of patient-reported outcomes and hrqol should be an important component of care for patients with advanced lung cancer. 2020 Multimed Inc.
RCT Entities:
Introduction: Improving health-related quality of life (hrqol) is a key goal of systemic therapy in advanced lung cancer, although routine assessment remains challenging. We analyzed the impact of a real-time electronic hrqol tool, the electronic Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (elcss-ql), on palliative care (pc) referral rates, patterns of chemotherapy treatment, and use of other supportive interventions in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) receiving first-line chemotherapy. Methods:Patients with advanced nsclc starting first-line chemotherapy were randomized to their oncologist receiving or not receiving their elcss-ql data before each clinic visit. Patients completed the elcss-ql at baseline, before each chemotherapy cycle, and at subsequent follow-up visits until disease progression. Prospective data about the pc referral rate, hrqol, and use of other supportive interventions were collected. Results: For the 95 patients with advanced nsclc who participated, oncologists received real-time elcss-ql data for 44 (elcss-ql arm) and standard clinical assessment alone for 51 (standard arm). The primary endpoint, the pc referral rate, was numerically higher, but statistically similar, for patients in the elcss-ql and standard arms. The hrqol scores over time were not significantly different between the two study arms. Conclusions: The elcss-ql is feasible as a tool for use in routine clinical practice, although no statistically significant effect of its use was demonstrated in our study. Improving access to supportive care through the collection of patient-reported outcomes and hrqol should be an important component of care for patients with advanced lung cancer. 2020 Multimed Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Patient-reported outcomes; palliative care; supportive care
Authors: Virginia Sun; Dan J Raz; Nora Ruel; Walter Chang; Loretta Erhunmwunsee; Karen Reckamp; Brian Tiep; Betty Ferrell; Ruth McCorkle; Jae Y Kim Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Camilla Zimmermann; Nadia Swami; Monika Krzyzanowska; Breffni Hannon; Natasha Leighl; Amit Oza; Malcolm Moore; Anne Rydall; Gary Rodin; Ian Tannock; Allan Donner; Christopher Lo Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jennifer L Steel; David A Geller; Kevin H Kim; Lisa H Butterfield; Michael Spring; Jonathan Grady; Weiing Sun; Wallis Marsh; Michael Antoni; Mary Amanda Dew; Vicki Helgeson; Richard Schulz; Allan Tsung Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ann H Partridge; Davinia S E Seah; Tari King; Natasha B Leighl; Ralph Hauke; Dana S Wollins; Jamie Hayden Von Roenn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Chris Gibbons; Ian Porter; Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Stanimir Stoilov; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Elena Tsangaris; Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli; Antoinette Davey; Elizabeth J Gibbons; Anna Kotzeva; Jonathan Evans; Philip J van der Wees; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Joanne Greenhalgh; Peter Bower; Jordi Alonso; Jose M Valderas Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-10-12