Literature DB >> 22464092

Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation.

Linda Resnik1, Marissa R Meucci, Shana Lieberman-Klinger, Christopher Fantini, Debra L Kelty, Roxanne Disla, Nicole Sasson.   

Abstract

The number of catastrophic injuries caused by improvised explosive devices in the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars has increased public, legislative, and research attention to upper limb amputation. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has partnered with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and DEKA Integrated Solutions to optimize the function of an advanced prosthetic arm system that will enable greater independence and function. In this special communication, we examine current practices in prosthetic rehabilitation including trends in adoption and use of prosthetic devices, financial considerations, and the role of rehabilitation team members in light of our experiences with a prototype advanced upper limb prosthesis during a VA study to optimize the device. We discuss key challenges in the adoption of advanced prosthetic technology and make recommendations for service provision and use of advanced upper limb prosthetics. Rates of prosthetic rejection are high among upper limb amputees. However, these rates may be reduced with sufficient training by a highly specialized, multidisciplinary team of clinicians, and a focus on patient education and empowerment throughout the rehabilitation process. There are significant challenges emerging that are unique to implementing the use of advanced upper limb prosthetic technology, and a lack of evidence to establish clinical guidelines regarding prosthetic prescription and treatment. Finally, we make recommendations for future research to aid in the identification of best practices and development of policy decisions regarding insurance coverage of prosthetic rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22464092     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  34 in total

Review 1.  Neural interfaces for somatosensory feedback: bringing life to a prosthesis.

Authors:  Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.710

2.  Motor performance benefits of matched limb imitation in prosthesis users.

Authors:  William F Cusack; Rebecca Patterson; Scott Thach; Robert S Kistenberg; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Recent Developments in Prosthesis Sensors, Texture Recognition, and Sensory Stimulation for Upper Limb Prostheses.

Authors:  Andrew Masteller; Sriramana Sankar; Han Biehn Kim; Keqin Ding; Xiaogang Liu; Angelo H All
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Enhanced Neurobehavioral Outcomes of Action Observation Prosthesis Training.

Authors:  William F Cusack; Scott Thach; Rebecca Patterson; Dan Acker; Robert S Kistenberg; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Ten-Year Outcomes of a Systems-Based Approach to Longitudinal Amputation Care in the US Department of Veteran Affairs.

Authors:  Joseph Webster; Joel Scholten; Patricia Young; Billie J Randolph
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2020-08

Review 6.  Cortical neuroprosthetics from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Adelyn P Tsu; Mark J Burish; Jason GodLove; Karunesh Ganguly
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 7.  The Evolution of Neuroprosthetic Interfaces.

Authors:  Dayo O Adewole; Mijail D Serruya; James P Harris; Justin C Burrell; Dmitriy Petrov; H Isaac Chen; John A Wolf; D Kacy Cullen
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2016

8.  Movement quality of conventional prostheses and the DEKA Arm during everyday tasks.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cowley; Linda Resnik; Jason Wilken; Lisa Smurr Walters; Deanna Gates
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 9.  Evaluation of Performance-Based Outcome Measures for the Upper Limb: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sophie Wang; C Janice Hsu; Lauren Trent; Tiffany Ryan; Nathan T Kearns; Eugene F Civillico; Kimberly L Kontson
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Deleterious Musculoskeletal Conditions Secondary to Lower Limb Loss: Considerations for Prosthesis-Related Factors.

Authors:  Ashley D Knight; Christopher L Dearth; Brad D Hendershot
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.