Literature DB >> 26438442

Enhanced Neurobehavioral Outcomes of Action Observation Prosthesis Training.

William F Cusack1, Scott Thach1, Rebecca Patterson1, Dan Acker1, Robert S Kistenberg1, Lewis A Wheaton2.   

Abstract

Background Previous studies have demonstrated improved neurobehavioral outcomes when prosthesis users learn task-specific behaviors by imitating movements of prosthesis users (matched limb) compared with intact limbs (mismatched limb). Objective This study is the first to use a unique combination of neurophysiological and task performance methods to investigate prosthetic device training strategies from a cognitive motor control perspective. Intact nonamputated prosthesis users (NAPUs) donned specially adapted prosthetic devices to simulate the wrist and forearm movement that persons with transradial limb loss experience. The hypothesis is that NAPUs trained with matched limb imitation would show greater engagement of parietofrontal regions and reduced movement variability compared with their counterparts trained with a mismatched limb. Methods Training elapsed over 3 days comprised alternating periods of video demonstration observation followed by action imitation. At the beginning and end of the training protocol, participants performed a cued movement paradigm while electroencephalography and electrogoniometry data were collected to track changes in cortical activity and movement variability, respectively. Results Matched limb participants showed greater engagement of motor-related areas while mismatched limb participants showed greater engagement of the parietooccipital system. Matched limb participants also showed lower movement variability. Conclusions These results indicate that the type of limb imitated influences neural and behavioral strategies for novel prosthetic device usage. This finding is important, as customary prosthetic rehabilitation with intact therapists involves mismatched limb imitation that may exacerbate challenges in adapting to new motor patterns demanded by prosthesis use.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; electroencephalography; motor control; tool use; upper extremity prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26438442      PMCID: PMC4821819          DOI: 10.1177/1545968315606992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  45 in total

1.  Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Giovanni Buccino; Fausta Lui; Nicola Canessa; Ilaria Patteri; Giovanna Lagravinese; Francesca Benuzzi; Carlo A Porro; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The effect of limb support on muscle activation during shoulder exercises.

Authors:  Michael Brian Wise; Tim L Uhl; Carl G Mattacola; Arthur J Nitz; W Ben Kibler
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Pantomime of tool use depends on integrity of left inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Georg Goldenberg; Joachim Hermsdörfer; Ralf Glindemann; Chris Rorden; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years.

Authors:  Elaine A Biddiss; Tom T Chau
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Neural representations of pantomimed and actual tool use: evidence from an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  J Hermsdörfer; G Terlinden; M Mühlau; G Goldenberg; A M Wohlschläger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Managing the upper extremity amputee: a protocol for success.

Authors:  Lisa M Smurr; Kristin Gulick; Kathleen Yancosek; Oren Ganz
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

7.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP.

Authors:  H V Semlitsch; P Anderer; P Schuster; O Presslich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Randomized trial of observation and execution of upper extremity actions versus action alone in children with unilateral cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Giuseppina Sgandurra; Adriano Ferrari; Giuseppe Cossu; Andrea Guzzetta; Leonardo Fogassi; Giovanni Cioni
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  EEG recordings in the course of recovery from stroke.

Authors:  S Giaquinto; A Cobianchi; F Macera; G Nolfe
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  Stimulation through simulation? Motor imagery and functional reorganization in hemiplegic stroke patients.

Authors:  Scott H Johnson-Frey
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  2 in total

1.  Remodeling of cortical activity for motor control following upper limb loss.

Authors:  Laura Williams; Nikta Pirouz; J C Mizelle; William Cusack; Rob Kistenberg; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Emergence of perceptuomotor relationships during paleolithic stone toolmaking learning: intersections of observation and practice.

Authors:  Kristel Yu Tiamco Bayani; Nikhilesh Natraj; Nada Khresdish; Justin Pargeter; Dietrich Stout; Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-11-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.