Literature DB >> 33140242

Recent Developments in Prosthesis Sensors, Texture Recognition, and Sensory Stimulation for Upper Limb Prostheses.

Andrew Masteller1, Sriramana Sankar1, Han Biehn Kim1, Keqin Ding1, Xiaogang Liu2,3, Angelo H All4.   

Abstract

Current developments being made in upper limb prostheses are focused on replacing lost sensory information to the amputees. Providing sensory stimulation from the prosthesis can directly improve control over the prosthetic and provide a sense of body ownership. The focus of this review article is on recent developments while including foundational knowledge for some of the critical concepts in neural prostheses. Reported concepts follow the flow of information from sensors to signal processing, with emphasis on texture recognition, and then to sensory stimulation strategies that reestablish the lost sensory feedback loop. Prosthetic sensors are used to detect the physical environment, converting pressure, force, and position into electrical signals. The electrical signals can then be processed in an effort to identify the surrounding environment using distinctive characteristics such as stiffness and texture. In order for the amputee to use this information in a natural manner, there must be real-time sensory stimulation, perception, and motor control of the prosthesis. Although truly complete sensory replacement has not yet been realized, some basic percepts can be partially restored, allowing progress towards a more realistic prosthesis with natural sensations.

Keywords:  Biomimetic; Embodiment; Nerve electrodes; Noninvasive stimulation; Phantom limb stimulation; Sensory feedback

Year:  2020        PMID: 33140242     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02678-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  35 in total

1.  A transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME) to interface with the peripheral nerve.

Authors:  Tim Boretius; Jordi Badia; Aran Pascual-Font; Martin Schuettler; Xavier Navarro; Ken Yoshida; Thomas Stieglitz
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 2.  Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years.

Authors:  Elaine A Biddiss; Tom T Chau
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Object discrimination using electrotactile feedback.

Authors:  Tapas J Arakeri; Brady A Hasse; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  A tactile sensor using a conductive graphene-sponge composite.

Authors:  Sungwoo Chun; Ahyoung Hong; Yeonhoi Choi; Chunho Ha; Wanjun Park
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 5.  Pursuing prosthetic electronic skin.

Authors:  Alex Chortos; Jia Liu; Zhenan Bao
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 43.841

6.  Evaluation of high-density, multi-contact nerve cuffs for activation of grasp muscles in monkeys.

Authors:  N A Brill; S N Naufel; K Polasek; C Ethier; J Cheesborough; S Agnew; L E Miller; D J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Near-infrared deep brain stimulation via upconversion nanoparticle-mediated optogenetics.

Authors:  Shuo Chen; Adam Z Weitemier; Xiao Zeng; Linmeng He; Xiyu Wang; Yanqiu Tao; Arthur J Y Huang; Yuki Hashimotodani; Masanobu Kano; Hirohide Iwasaki; Laxmi Kumar Parajuli; Shigeo Okabe; Daniel B Loong Teh; Angelo H All; Iku Tsutsui-Kimura; Kenji F Tanaka; Xiaogang Liu; Thomas J McHugh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  "Long-term stability of stimulating spiral nerve cuff electrodes on human peripheral nerves".

Authors:  Breanne P Christie; Max Freeberg; William D Memberg; Gilles J C Pinault; Harry A Hoyen; Dustin J Tyler; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 9.  The sensory neurons of touch.

Authors:  Victoria E Abraira; David D Ginty
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  Restoring sensorimotor function through intracortical interfaces: progress and looming challenges.

Authors:  Sliman J Bensmaia; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  5 in total

1.  High Energy Side and Rear American Football Head Impacts Cause Obvious Performance Decrement on Video.

Authors:  Adam J Bartsch; Daniel Hedin; Jay Alberts; Edward C Benzel; Jason Cruickshank; Robert S Gray; Kenneth Cameron; Megan N Houston; Tyler Rooks; Gerald McGinty; Erick Kozlowski; Steven Rowson; Joseph C Maroon; Vincent J Miele; J Chris Ashton; Gunter P Siegmund; Alok Shah; Michael McCrea; Brian Stemper
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Physics-Informed Machine Learning Improves Detection of Head Impacts.

Authors:  Samuel J Raymond; Nicholas J Cecchi; Hossein Vahid Alizadeh; Ashlyn A Callan; Eli Rice; Yuzhe Liu; Zhou Zhou; Michael Zeineh; David B Camarillo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Development of a Low-Power Instrumented Mouthpiece for Directly Measuring Head Acceleration in American Football.

Authors:  Lee F Gabler; Nathan Z Dau; Gwansik Park; Alex Miles; Kristy B Arbogast; Jeff R Crandall
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Tactile Interaction Sensor with Millimeter Sensing Acuity.

Authors:  Eunsuk Choi; Sunjin Kim; Jinsil Gong; Hyeonjeong Sun; Minjin Kwon; Hojun Seo; Onejae Sul; Seung-Beck Lee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone.

Authors:  Pamela Svensson; Christian Antfolk; Anders Björkman; Nebojša Malešević
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.