Mitchel R Stacy1, Mark W Maxfield, Albert J Sinusas. 1. Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. mitchel.stacy@yale.edu
Abstract
Over the past few decades, there have been significant advancements in the imaging techniques of positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission tomography (SPECT). These changes have allowed for the targeted imaging of cellular processes and the development of hybrid imaging systems (e.g., SPECT/CT and PET/CT), which provide both functional and structural images of biological systems. One area that has garnered particular attention is angiogenesis as it relates to ischemic heart disease and limb ischemia. Though the aforementioned techniques have benefits and consequences, they enable scientists and clinicians to identify regions that are vulnerable to or have been exposed to ischemic injury via non-invasive means. This literature review highlights the advancements in molecular imaging techniques and specific probes as they pertain to the process of angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease.
Over the past few decades, there have been significant advancements in the imaging techniques of positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission tomography (SPECT). These changes have allowed for the targeted imaging of cellular processes and the development of hybrid imaging systems (e.g., SPECT/CT and PET/CT), which provide both functional and structural images of biological systems. One area that has garnered particular attention is angiogenesis as it relates to ischemic heart disease and limb ischemia. Though the aforementioned techniques have benefits and consequences, they enable scientists and clinicians to identify regions that are vulnerable to or have been exposed to ischemic injury via non-invasive means. This literature review highlights the advancements in molecular imaging techniques and specific probes as they pertain to the process of angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease.
Along with other imaging modalities such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and single photon emission tomography
(SPECT), imaging techniques have continued to evolve over the last 30 years,
advancing the assessment of cardiovascular diseases. These imaging modalities each
have advantages and disadvantages. Ultrasound has traditionally been the most widely
available and relatively inexpensive means for imaging of the cardiovascular system
without exposure to radiation; however, this modality has limited penetration depth
and does not have molecular probes available that permit interrogation beyond the
intravascular compartment. MRI is another imaging method that does not expose
patients to radiation, although it is much more expensive. This modality has good
spatial resolution and tissue penetration, but much lower sensitivity for targeted
imaging than nuclear imaging techniques such as PET and SPECT. Additionally, MRI has
a susceptibility to motion artifacts and currently does not have the availability of
as many molecular probes as PET and SPECT. PET and SPECT imaging systems possess
superior sensitivity, and there is availability of a wide range of imaging probes
for in vivo analysis of cellular processes. However, a disadvantage associated with
both of these modalities is their lower resolution and exposure of patients to
ionizing radiation [1,2].PET and SPECT have been the traditional nuclear modalities used for in
vivo imaging of molecular and cellular processes [1-4]. More recent developments in nuclear imaging in the last decade
have seen the emergence of hybrid imaging systems that also incorporate the use of
X-ray computed tomography (CT) with both PET and SPECT, providing the
co-localization of both functional and anatomical information for a wide range of
clinical applications. These hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT imaging systems offer unique
insight into critical cellular processes contributing to the development of a
variety of cardiovascular disease states, as multiple radiolabeled probes are
available that specifically target a variety of molecular and biological processes
of interest [5-8]. Additionally, the creation of hybrid imaging systems
has facilitated the combination of high sensitivity radiotracer-based imaging with
high resolution CT imaging, allowing for co-localization of function images with
anatomical images. These hybrid systems permit attenuation correction, minimizing
attenuation artifacts from soft tissue, and correction of partial volume effects,
ultimately resulting in enhanced quantification of radiotracers. These imaging
approaches ultimately will result in better individualized health care as physicians
more accurately quantify molecular signals within specific anatomical structures of
interest. Additionally, the increased availability of microPET and microSPECT
imaging systems should allow for enhanced translational research from small animal
preclinical models of cardiovascular disease into the clinical environment
[9-13].Angiogenesis, or the growth of new capillaries from existing microvessels, is a
specific process that can occur following ischemic injury and thus has gained
attention as a critical target within the cardiovascular imaging community in recent
years [1,2,7,8,14]. The
purpose of this review is to focus on specific molecular imaging targets directed at
the process of angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease. A PubMed search of “imaging,
angiogenesis” returned nearly 3,000 results, with articles being selected based on
relevance to the topic at hand (i.e., PET and SPECT imaging).
Molecular Imaging
Molecular imaging, in general, is defined as the in vivo-targeted
imaging of biological processes. This imaging approach incorporates molecular probes
that localize to specific molecular events associated with physiological or
pathological processes [2,3]. The magnitude of these events
occurring within biological systems is assessed based upon the magnitude of probe
uptake within the region of interest. The high sensitivity of nuclear imaging
systems contributes to the identification of probe uptake, while high resolution
information from X-ray CT contributes important information related to the
anatomical localization of probe. Successful molecular imaging relies on multiple
factors, such as the availability of the probe that is specific and sensitive to the
molecular process being examined, as well as the appropriate instrumentation to
allow for desirable visualization and quantification of probe uptake [1]. The application of molecular imaging
already has proven to be valuable for those within the oncology community by
assisting with early detection and intervention strategies [15]. Further development of the
molecular imaging approach should continue to improve disease management for
additional disease states by not only early identification and detection in
vulnerable patient populations, but also by facilitating the direction of
pharmacological, cell-based, and genetic therapeutic regimens in the future. One
field of study within the molecular imaging community that continues to evolve is
targeted imaging of angiogenesis, a process that plays a critical role both in tumor
biology and the repair following ischemic injury.
Angiogenesis
Angiogenesis is generally defined as the development of new capillaries from
pre-existing microvessels. This complex, multistep process involves a variety of
cells, along with both stimulatory and inhibitory factors [16]. Commonly, differentiation of
angioblasts into endothelial cells leads to endothelial cell sprouting
[17]. Growth factors
serve to activate pre-existing endothelial cell receptors, leading to the release of
proteases and regulating the degradation of the basement membrane, ultimately
allowing for the release of endothelial cells from parent vessels. Endothelial cell
sprouting occurs as endothelial cell proliferation and migration into the
extracellular matrix takes place with the help of adhesion molecules and integrins.
These sprouting endothelial cells develop into new vessels with the addition of
pericytes or vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), which serve to stabilize the
developing vessel and regulate blood flow. In addition to sprouting angiogenesis,
splitting angiogenesis, or intussusception, also exists. In this form of
angiogenesis, single vessels are split into two as the capillary wall extends into
the vessel lumen. Reorganization of existing cells ultimately results in the
formation of an additional vessel lumen, which splits from the parent vessel
[16-19].Several conditions known to stimulate the angiogenic process include ischemia,
hypoxia, inflammation, shear stress, and traumatic injury [17]. Previous research has largely
focused on imaging of angiogenesis within tumors [20-22], as well
as skeletal [9,23-25] and
cardiac muscle [26-29] exposed to surgically induced
ischemia. The addition of recently developed vessels within these tissues has
important clinical implications, as they can ultimately lead to increased perfusion
to injured or ischemic tissues [30].A variety of factors have been found to contribute to the process of angiogenesis
following hypoxia-induced conditions, including hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1),
vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF),
fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), and
angiopoietins (interacting with their Tie receptors) [31-34]. Through
the actions of these angiogenic-induced factors, a number of other important
mediators are then signaled, including endothelial cells, SMCs, blood-derived
macrophages, and circulating stem cells [35]. Although various angiogenesis-stimulating factors exist,
VEGF is considered the most potent and predominant factor [18,19]. VEGF ligands, of which there are four known isoforms, mediate
their angiogenic effects by binding to specific VEGF receptors (VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2,
and VEGFR-3), leading to receptor dimerization and subsequent intracellular signal
transduction via tyrosine kinases [20]. In addition to the previously mentioned angiogenic factors,
integrins also have been implicated in a number of processes related to
angiogenesis, including cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, differentiation,
and survival [36].
Specifically, the αvβ3 integrin, a heterodimeric cell surface receptor, plays a
significant role in angiogenesis by allowing cells to interact with the
extracellular matrix, contributing to the migration of endothelial cells. Because of
their important roles in angiogenesis, the αvβ3 integrin and VEGF have been targeted
for multiple molecular imaging studies and remain as a focus of interest
[9,24,26,27,29,37].
Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis
Angiogenesis imaging can be categorized as targeted at three major cell types: 1)
non-endothelial cell targets (e.g., monocytes, macrophages, and stem cells); 2)
endothelial cell targets (e.g., VEGF, growth factor receptors, integrins, CD13, cell
adhesion molecules); and 3) extracellular matrix proteins and matrix proteases
[1,38]. Recent techniques in nuclear medicine also have focused on
the development of tracers targeting the ED-B domain of a fibronectin isoform, as
fibronectin plays an important role in the binding of integrins and extracellular
matrix components during the process of angiogenesis [39]. Additionally, targeted imaging of stem cell
therapy is another emerging technique, which has been performed in MRI
[40,41], SPECT [42], and PET [43-45]. The growth of
this field should further enhance future angiogenesis cell-based therapy; however,
many of the agents used in nuclear imaging for this purpose are not well studied and
warrant further investigation. The use of the contrast agents in MRI for targeted
imaging of angiogenesis is also gaining interest, as they have been shown to
permeate the walls of angiogenic capillaries and assist in targeted imaging of
integrins within areas of vascular growth [21,46-48]. Targeted CT contrast agents may offer a similar
approach that could be combined with targeted radiotracers using hybrid PET/CT and
SPECT/CT.There has been significant focus on targeted imaging of the αvβ3 integrin with
ligand-like peptidomimetics or the RGD (arginine-glycine-aspartate) peptide sequence
[9,12,24,26,27,29,49-52]. The RGD binding
motif for integrins has led to the development of multiple molecular probes that
have advanced the in vivo imaging of angiogenesis. Various
improvements in integrin-targeted constructs also have increased the optimization of
pharmacokinetics and binding characteristics. More recent developments in
nanoparticle technology are enhancing the ability to deliver various imaging agents
to targeted regions of interest, ultimately leading to improved sensitivity and
image quality [1]. This review
will focus on more established methods for targeted imaging of the angiogenic
process. Most notably, this paper will detail the altered expression of VEGF
receptors and αvβ3 integrins.
VEGF Receptors
VEGF has been identified as an important stimulator of the angiogenic process
[19]. Because of this,
multiple SPECT and PET molecular probes have been developed for targeted imaging of
VEGF receptors in tumor, peripheral limb, and myocardial angiogenesis (Table 1). Specifically, many studies have
focused on targeted imaging of angiogenesis in animal models of induced ischemia
[9,23,24,26,27,29,53]. Human monoclonal anti-VEGF antibodies labeled with radioiodine
(124I and 123I) were examined in initial studies of VEGF
using PET and SPECT. Unfortunately, the preclinical applications of these studies
were limited by slower than usual clearance rates of these antibodies [54,55]. To address this shortcoming, new molecular probes were created.
This advancement targeting ligands served as the foundation for more efficient
investigation and monitoring of the upregulation of VEGF during angiogenesis.
VEGF165 and VEGF121 were designed for this purpose and
implemented in early imaging studies of tumor angiogenesis. These isoforms proved to
be successful in patients when radiolabeled with 123I [55].
Table 1
A Summary of Molecular Probes used for Non-invasive Imaging of
Angiogenesis.
Marker
Probe
Imaging Modality
Biologic Target
VEGF
124I-VG76e
PET
Tumor angiogenesis
VEGF
123I-VEGF165
SPECT
Tumor angiogenesis
VEGF
111In-VEGF121
SPECT
Peripheral limb angiogenesis
VEGF
64Cu-VEGF121
PET
Tumor angiogenesis
VEGF
64Cu-VEGF121
PET
Myocardial angiogenesis
VEGF
99mTc-scVEGF
SPECT
Peripheral limb angiogenesis
VEGF
64Cu-scVEGF
PET
Tumor angiogenesis
αvβ3
111In-RP748
SPECT
Tumor angiogenesis
αvβ3
111In-RP748
SPECT
Myocardial angiogenesis
αvβ3
18F-AH111585
PET
Tumor angiogenesis
In addition to targeted imaging of tumor angiogenesis, peripheral angiogenesis also
has been examined in ischemia-induced animal models [9,23,24,53]. A murine model of hind limb ischemia-induced angiogenesis has
revealed that 64Cu-6DOTA-VEGF121 is effective in PET imaging
of VEGFR-2 [23].
VEGF121 labeled with 111In has also been developed as a
targeting ligand for SPECT and was successfully used to image peripheral
angiogenesis in a rabbit model of hind limb ischemia [53]. Analysis with immunohistochemistry revealed an
increased expression of the VEGF receptors KDR (VEGFR-2) and Flt-1 (VEGFR-1) within
skeletal muscle exposed to hypoxia post-femoral artery excision. However,
substantially larger biodistribution of the radiotracer (approximately 20-fold
higher) in multiple organs systems (liver, kidneys) was evident when compared to the
ischemic limb. Possible explanations for this disparity may be associated with VEGF
receptor or macrophage density within different regions or may closely correspond to
particle size or coating [2,56,57].A rat model of myocardial infarction (MI) also has revealed enhanced angiogenesis
through targeted PET imaging with the tracer
64Cu-6DOTA-VEGF121 (Figure
1) [13]. Following
left coronary artery ligation, hearts were imaged with microSPECT and microCT at
various time points to examine early angiogenesis in ischemic territories of the
infarcted heart. Imaging demonstrated that tracer signal was increased within the
infarcted region, which was indicated by decreased fluorodeoxyglucose
(18F-FDG) uptake, an established marker of cellular viability. The
increased signal of 64Cu-6DOTA-VEGF121 peaked at three days
post-MI and corresponded to post-mortem tissue analysis of VEGF receptor expression,
as indicated by immunoflourescence microscopy. In addition to targeted imaging of
angiogenesis post-MI, the same VEGF121 isoform has been successfully used
to image tumor angiogenesis in a mouse model in PET [58] and to develop single-chain technetium-labeled
VEGF-based probes that are capable of assessing tumor associated angiogenic
vasculature in PET and SPECT [59,60].
Figure 1
Myocardial origin of Coregistered images of microCT (left), PET
(right), and fused PET/CT image (center) within infarcted region of heart
demonstrates that the 64Cu-DOTA-VEGF121 signal detected
with PET corresponds to anterolateral myocardium (PET and fused images, red
arrow) and is clearly separated from intercostal muscle layer (microCT image,
white arrow). There is also increased uptake in the surgical wound area (PET
image, arrowhead). b) Representative images of
64Cu-DOTA-VEGF121 (left), 18F-FDG (right),
and 64Cu-DOTA-VEGF121/18F-FDG fused image
(middle). 18F-FDG imaging shows that surgical ligation of the
coronary artery resulted in lack of 18F-FDG uptake (yellow arrow) and
that uptake of 64Cu-DOTA-VEGF121 occurs in areas supplied
by ligated coronary artery (turquoise arrow). The fusion of both images results
in complementation of 18F-FDG and
64Cu-DOTA-VEGF121 signals. There is also increased
uptake in the surgical wound area (arrowhead). (reprinted with permission of
[13])
The development of a cardiac-specific reporter in microPET imaging of rats may offer
insight into an additional therapeutic route via a gene expression system
[11,61-63]. This
system targets specific sites of the cardiovascular system for the delivery of
angiogenic factors, therapeutic gene vectors, and stem cells, with the ultimate goal
of stimulating angiogenesis within the region of interest. A previous study has used
a similar type of gene technology to identify the expression of VEGF121
in porcine myocardium with PET-CT following adenoviral transfer [61]. Ultimately, this system could lead
to targeted therapeutic interventions while also incorporating an established
imaging modality for clinical assessment.
αVβ3 INTEGRIN
The αvβ3 integrin is found in abundance on the surface of proliferating endothelial
cells and is a consistent and specific marker of ongoing angiogenesis [4]. For this reason, targeted molecular
imaging of the αvβ3 integrin presents a novel noninvasive approach for the
assessment of angiogenesis. Early research focused on MRI of the αvβ3 integrin with
a paramagnetic-labeled monoclonal antibody to examine angiogenesis in a rabbit model
of squamous cell carcinoma [21]. However, poor clearance of this antibody limited its
translation into future studies. Since then, development of RGD peptides with high
affinities for the αvβ3 integrin has led to the advancement of a variety of
radiotracers suitable for the assessment of angiogenesis in PET and SPECT imaging
(Table 1) [50,64,65]. Additionally, the peptidomimetic
111In-RP748 has shown a high affinity to the αvβ3 integrin and has
been successfully incorporated in multiple studies [26,28].
Specifically, 111In-RP748 has shown increased levels of uptake within
localized regions of decreased perfusion in the myocardium of rodent and canine
models of myocardial infarction, as assessed by SPECT imaging [26,28]. In these studies, imaging with 111In-RP748 confirmed
that increased αvβ3 integrin activity was present within the myocardium at both
early (acute) and late (3 weeks) time points post-infarction [26,28]. Given these results, targeted imaging of integrin activation
appears to provide a useful technique that can be translated to the clinical setting
for the detection of angiogenesis post-myocardial infarction. In support of this
argument, the PET imaging tracer 18F-Galakto-RGD targeted at integrin
activation previously has been successfully used to image angiogenesis in a patient
2 weeks post-myocardial infarction [51].99mTc-NC100692 (maraciclatide®) is a technetium-labeled cyclic RGD peptide
that has been used in a variety of SPECT studies to noninvasively assess
angiogenesis [2]. The NC100692
compound has a high affinity for the αvβ3 integrin, is metabolically stable, and has
a biodistribution and kinetics that are favorable for SPECT imaging. Increased focal
activity of 99mTc-NC100692 has been demonstrated with SPECT at 3 and 7
days post-femoral artery ligation in a murine model of hind limb ischemia
[24]. These results were
further confirmed by the close correlation of ex vivo tissue
analysis (gamma counting) and immunofluorescence staining. A similar study using a
murine model of hind limb ischemia examined peripheral angiogenesis in wild-type and
endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) deficient animals with microSPECT-CT (Figure 2) [9]. This study, directed at serial quantitative evaluation of
angiogenesis, revealed decreased uptake of the compound within ischemic regions of
the eNOS deficient mice when compared to wild-type. Both groups, however, exhibited
the largest retention of 99mTc-NC100692 at 7 days post-femoral artery
occlusion, as indicated by ex vivo gamma counting of ischemic
tissue. Other studies using microSPECT-CT have confirmed the uptake of
99mTc-NC100692 within mice [12] and rats [29,52] following
surgically induced myocardial infarction. Dobrucki et al. used
99mTc-NC100692 microSPECT imaging to evaluate the effects of gene therapy
directed at stimulating angiogenesis. In this study, focal uptake of
99mTc-NC100692 was seen in the peri-infarct region in association with
accelerated angiogenesis induced by intramyocardial injection of a viral vector to
upregulate expression of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) in rats, with further
validation provided via gamma counting of heart tissue (Figure 3) [29]. The clinical translation of cardiovascular SPECT imaging with
99mTc-NC100692 was recently shown (Figure 4) and demonstrated the feasibility and applicability of this
targeted imaging approach for broad scale clinical application in ischemic heart
disease [66].
Figure 2
Analysis of wild-type and eNOS-knockout mice. a) Micro-SPECT/CT of
mice injected with 99mTc-NC100692 following right femoral artery
ligation. Yellow arrows indicate ischemic regions with increased
99mTc-NC100692 retention. b) Serial images were analyzed
and ischemic-to-nonischemic 99mTc-NC100692 activity ratios
calculated. Solid bars represent eNOS -/- knockout. Striped bars represent eNOS
+/+ wild-type. *P < 0.05 vs. wild-type. #P <0.05 vs. baseline.
(reprinted with permission of [9]).
Figure 3
Thallium-201 perfusion
(top row, green) and αvβ3 integrin targeted imaging (middle row, red) with
SPECT-CT in an IGF-1 treated rat at 4 weeks post-MI. Bottom row represents fused
image with reference contrast CT image (grayscale). b) Gamma count
profiles of thallium-201 (open circles) and 99mTc-NC100692 (solid
circles) from middle myocardial sections. (reprinted with permission of
[29])
Figure 4
Targeted imaging of angiogenesis with SPECT in a patient 3 weeks
post-myocardial infarction. Short (a) and long-axis
(b) views of enhanced αvβ3 integrin signal (arrowheads) within
infracted region, with corresponding 99mTc-MIBI perfusion images.
Images courtesy of Drs. Johan Verjans and Leonard Hofstra, University Hospital,
Maastricht, the Netherlands. (reprinted with permission of [66])
The development of an αvβ3 integrin targeted nanoprobe also provides a new technique
for the detection of in vivo angiogenesis with PET [67]. The nanoprobe allows for labeling
with isotopes while also having a shell that is decorated with an RGD peptides to
confer specificity to the αvβ3 integrin [4]. This work has demonstrated a more favorable biodistribution
of the targeted nanoprobe and retained specificity to regions of ischemia when
applied in a murine model of hind limb ischemia (Figure 5) [67].
Ex vivo analysis by imaging and histology has confirmed the
effectiveness of this nanoprobe for assessment of angiogenesis. This nanoprobe also
may allow for targeted drug delivery. Further development and application of this
nanotechnology to angiogenesis imaging will offer a promising new approach with the
potential for translation of novel theranostics into clinical practice.
Figure 5
PET/CT imaging of angiogenesis in a murine model of hindlimb ischemia.
a) Non-targeted dendritic nanoprobes (bottom center). b)
Higher uptake of αvβ3 -targeted dendritic nanoprobes in ischemic hindlimb (left
side of image) than in control hindlimb (right side of image). (reprinted with
permission of [67])
Conclusions
In summary, PET and SPECT imaging can provide molecular targeted approaches for the
early in vivo assessment of biological processes that precede the
physiological or anatomical manifestation of a disease. Research has shown that
these molecular imaging approaches offer unique opportunities for evaluation of the
processes that regulate cardiovascular disease pathogenesis, progression, and
therapeutic intervention. Additionally, these imaging modalities have provided
methods for the noninvasive assessment of angiogenesis during instances of
myocardial and limb ischemia. The development of novel molecular probes and hybrid
imaging systems continue to increase the potential for translational research from
small and large animal studies into clinical practice. The high sensitivity of PET
and SPECT images now can be co-localized with high resolution X-ray CT anatomical
images to better identify and quantify radiotracer uptake within vulnerable regions
of the heart and vasculature. Although these systems have expanded the possibility
for application of molecular imaging into the clinical setting, these systems still
need to be optimized and corrected for complicating cardiac and respiratory motion.
The potential for additional exposure to radiation from CT imaging is also a cause
for concern with these hybrid imaging systems. Despite these imperfections,
molecular imaging with new hybrid imaging technology offers a promising, unique
approach for translating targeted imaging of biological processes within the
cardiovascular system to humans. Pre-clinical animal studies investigating ischemic
tissues might offer insight into the future of treatment and targeted imaging. Many
clinical trials, to this point in time, have relied on clinical endpoints or the
evaluation of the indirect effects of therapy on physiological indices like tissue
perfusion and function. The continuing development of more sensitive, noninvasive
imaging modalities such as PET and SPECT may someday confirm the delivery of
therapeutic angiogenic agents and directly monitor progression of angiogenesis
within targeted tissues, providing novel methods for optimizing therapeutic
interventions in patients suffering from various forms of cardiovascular
disease.
Authors: S Li; M Peck-Radosavljevic; E Koller; F Koller; K Kaserer; A Kreil; S Kapiotis; A Hamwi; H A Weich; P Valent; P Angelberger; R Dudczak; I Virgolini Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Ivo R Buschmann; Michiel Voskuil; Niels van Royen; Imo E Hoefer; Klaus Scheffler; Sebastian Grundmann; Jürgen Hennig; Wolfgang Schaper; Christoph Bode; Jan J Piek Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: David Edwards; Paul Jones; Helena Haramis; Mark Battle; Rochelle Lear; D Jon Barnett; Catherine Edwards; Hazel Crawford; Andrew Black; Vanessa Godden Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Feng Cao; Zibo Li; Andrew Lee; Zhaofei Liu; Kai Chen; Hui Wang; Weibo Cai; Xiaoyuan Chen; Joseph C Wu Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-03-24 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: S Banai; M T Jaklitsch; M Shou; D F Lazarous; M Scheinowitz; S Biro; S E Epstein; E F Unger Journal: Circulation Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Patrick M Winter; Shelton D Caruthers; Andrea Kassner; Thomas D Harris; Lori K Chinen; John S Allen; Elizabeth K Lacy; Huiying Zhang; J David Robertson; Samuel A Wickline; Gregory M Lanza Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Carolina A Ferreira; Reinier Hernandez; Yunan Yang; Hector F Valdovinos; Jonathan W Engle; Weibo Cai Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Mitchel R Stacy; Da Yu Yu; Mark W Maxfield; Irina M Jaba; Bartosz P Jozwik; Zhen W Zhuang; Ben A Lin; Christi L Hawley; Christopher M Caracciolo; Prasanta Pal; Daniela Tirziu; Smita Sampath; Albert J Sinusas Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Fatemeh Khodadust; Aiarpi Ezdoglian; Maarten M Steinz; Judy R van Beijnum; Gerben J C Zwezerijnen; Gerrit Jansen; Sander W Tas; Conny J van der Laken Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-06-25 Impact factor: 6.208