Literature DB >> 22461103

The interindividual variation in femoral neck width is associated with the acquisition of predictable sets of morphological and tissue-quality traits and differential bone loss patterns.

Yan Epelboym1, R Nicholas Gendron, Jillian Mayer, Joseph Fusco, Philip Nasser, Gary Gross, Richard Ghillani, Karl J Jepsen.   

Abstract

A better understanding of femoral neck structure and age-related bone loss will benefit research aimed at reducing fracture risk. We used the natural variation in robustness (bone width relative to length) to analyze how adaptive processes covary traits in association with robustness, and whether the variation in robustness affects age-related bone loss patterns. Femoral necks from 49 female cadavers (29-93 years of age) were evaluated for morphological and tissue-level traits using radiography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, micro-computed tomography, and ash-content analysis. Femoral neck robustness was normally distributed and varied widely with a coefficient of variation of 14.9%. Age-adjusted partial regression analysis revealed significant negative correlations (p < 0.05) between robustness and relative cortical area, cortical tissue-mineral density (Ct.TMD), and trabecular bone mineral density (Ma.BMD). Path analysis confirmed these results showing that a one standard deviation (SD) increase in robustness was associated with a 0.70 SD decrease in RCA, 0.47 SD decrease in Ct.TMD, and 0.43 SD decrease in Ma.BMD. Significantly different bone loss patterns were observed when comparing the most slender and most robust tertiles. Robust femora showed significant negative correlations with age for cortical area (R(2) = 0.29, p < 0.03), Ma.BMD (R(2) = 0.34, p < 0.01), and Ct.TMD (R(2) = 0.4, p < 0.003). However, slender femora did not show these age-related changes (R(2) < 0.09, p > 0.2). The results indicated that slender femora were constructed with a different set of traits compared to robust femora, and that the natural variation in robustness was a determinant of age-related bone loss patterns. Clinical diagnoses and treatments may benefit from a better understanding of these robustness-specific structural and aging patterns.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22461103     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  11 in total

1.  Femoral Neck External Size but not aBMD Predicts Structural and Mass Changes for Women Transitioning Through Menopause.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Andrew Kozminski; Erin Mr Bigelow; Stephen H Schlecht; Robert W Goulet; Sioban D Harlow; Jane A Cauley; Carrie Karvonen-Gutierrez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Multiscale Predictors of Femoral Neck In Situ Strength in Aging Women: Contributions of BMD, Cortical Porosity, Reference Point Indentation, and Nonenzymatic Glycation.

Authors:  Adam C Abraham; Avinesh Agarwalla; Aditya Yadavalli; Christopher McAndrew; Jenny Y Liu; Simon Y Tang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  The development of inter-strain variation in cortical and trabecular traits during growth of the mouse lumbar vertebral body.

Authors:  M A Ramcharan; M E Faillace; Z Guengerich; V A Williams; K J Jepsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The relationship between whole bone stiffness and strength is age and sex dependent.

Authors:  Daniella M Patton; Erin M R Bigelow; Stephen H Schlecht; David H Kohn; Todd L Bredbenner; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  How Does Bone Strength Compare Across Sex, Site, and Ethnicity?

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Erin M R Bigelow; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Women Build Long Bones With Less Cortical Mass Relative to Body Size and Bone Size Compared With Men.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Erin M R Bigelow; Stephen H Schlecht
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Mapping the natural variation in whole bone stiffness and strength across skeletal sites.

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Erin M R Bigelow; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Intracortical remodeling parameters are associated with measures of bone robustness.

Authors:  Haviva M Goldman; Naomi A Hampson; J Jared Guth; David Lin; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 9.  Are we taking full advantage of the growing number of pharmacological treatment options for osteoporosis?

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Stephen H Schlecht; Kenneth M Kozloff
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.547

Review 10.  Bringing Mechanical Context to Image-Based Measurements of Bone Integrity.

Authors:  Lindsay L Loundagain; Todd L Bredbenner; Karl J Jepsen; W Brent Edwards
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.