Literature DB >> 25690167

Women Build Long Bones With Less Cortical Mass Relative to Body Size and Bone Size Compared With Men.

Karl J Jepsen1, Erin M R Bigelow, Stephen H Schlecht.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The twofold greater lifetime risk of fracturing a bone for white women compared with white men and black women has been attributed in part to differences in how the skeletal system accumulates bone mass during growth. On average, women build more slender long bones with less cortical area compared with men. Although slender bones are known to have a naturally lower cortical area compared with wider bones, it remains unclear whether the relatively lower cortical area of women is consistent with their increased slenderness or is reduced beyond that expected for the sex-specific differences in bone size and body size. Whether this sexual dimorphism is consistent with ethnic background and is recapitulated in the widely used mouse model also remains unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked (1) do black women build bones with reduced cortical area compared with black men; (2) do white women build bones with reduced cortical area compared with white men; and (3) do female mice build bones with reduced cortical area compared with male mice?
METHODS: Bone strength and cross-sectional morphology of adult human and mouse bone were calculated from quantitative CT images of the femoral midshaft. The data were tested for normality and regression analyses were used to test for differences in cortical area between men and women after adjusting for body size and bone size by general linear model (GLM).
RESULTS: Linear regression analysis showed that the femurs of black women had 11% lower cortical area compared with those of black men after adjusting for body size and bone size (women: mean=357.7 mm2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 347.9-367.5 mm2; men: mean=400.1 mm2; 95% CI, 391.5-408.7 mm2; effect size=1.2; p<0.001, GLM). Likewise, the femurs of white women had 12% less cortical area compared with those of white men after adjusting for body size and bone size (women: mean=350.1 mm2; 95% CI, 340.4-359.8 mm2; men: mean=394.3 mm2; 95% CI, 386.5-402.1 mm2; effect size=1.3; p<0.001, GLM). In contrast, female and male femora from recombinant inbred mouse strains showed the opposite trend; femurs from female mice had a 4% larger cortical area compared with those of male mice after adjusting for body size and bone size (female: mean=0.73 mm2; 95% CI, 0.71-0.74 mm2; male: mean=0.70 mm2; 95% CI, 0.68-0.71 mm2; effect size=0.74; p=0.04, GLM).
CONCLUSIONS: Female femurs are not simply a more slender version of male femurs. Women acquire substantially less mass (cortical area) for their body size and bone size compared with men. Our analysis questions whether mouse long bone is a suitable model to study human sexual dimorphism. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Identifying differences in the way bones are constructed may be clinically important for developing sex-specific diagnostics and treatment strategies to reduce fragility fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25690167      PMCID: PMC4488191          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4184-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  33 in total

Review 1.  Clinical review 137: Sexual dimorphism in skeletal size, density, and strength.

Authors:  E Seeman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Body size, body shape, and long bone strength in modern humans.

Authors:  C B Ruff
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.895

3.  Periosteal bone formation--a neglected determinant of bone strength.

Authors:  Ego Seeman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Defining the genetics of osteoporosis: using the mouse to understand man.

Authors:  C J Rosen; W G Beamer; L R Donahue
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study.

Authors:  T V Nguyen; J R Center; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Hierarchical relationship between bone traits and mechanical properties in inbred mice.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Ozan J Akkus; Robert J Majeska; Joseph H Nadeau
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 7.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Bone brittleness varies with genetic background in A/J and C57BL/6J inbred mice.

Authors:  K J Jepsen; D E Pennington; Y L Lee; M Warman; J Nadeau
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Mapping the natural variation in whole bone stiffness and strength across skeletal sites.

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Erin M R Bigelow; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  The structural and hormonal basis of sex differences in peak appendicular bone strength in rats.

Authors:  Bom-Taeck Kim; Lis Mosekilde; Yunbo Duan; Xin-Zhou Zhang; Lise Tornvig; Jesper Skovhus Thomsen; Ego Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  9 in total

1.  How Does Bone Strength Compare Across Sex, Site, and Ethnicity?

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Erin M R Bigelow; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Canalization Leads to Similar Whole Bone Mechanical Function at Maturity in Two Inbred Strains of Mice.

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Lauren M Smith; Melissa A Ramcharan; Erin Mr Bigelow; Bonnie T Nolan; Noah J Mathis; Amber Cathey; Eugene Manley; Rajasree Menon; Richard C McEachin; Joseph H Nadeau; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Application of Methods for a Morphological Analysis of the Femoral Diaphysis Based on Clinical CT Images to Prehistoric Human Bone: Comparison of Modern Japanese and Jomon Populations from Hegi Cave, Oita, Japan.

Authors:  Daisuke Endo; Kazunobu Saiki; Minoru Yoneda; Hajime Ishida; Keiko Ogami-Takamura; Rina Sakai; Kiyohito Murai; Takeshi Imamura; Yoshiatsu Naito; Tetsuaki Wakebe; Toshiyuki Tsurumoto
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 4.  Establishing biomechanical mechanisms in mouse models: practical guidelines for systematically evaluating phenotypic changes in the diaphyses of long bones.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Matthew J Silva; Deepak Vashishth; X Edward Guo; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Bone Microarchitecture Phenotypes Identified in Older Adults Are Associated With Different Levels of Osteoporotic Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Danielle E Whittier; Elizabeth J Samelson; Marian T Hannan; Lauren A Burt; David A Hanley; Emmanuel Biver; Pawel Szulc; Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu; Blandine Merle; Roland Chapurlat; Eric Lespessailles; Andy Kin On Wong; David Goltzman; Sundeep Khosla; Serge Ferrari; Mary L Bouxsein; Douglas P Kiel; Steven K Boyd
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.390

6.  Sex and External Size Specific Limitations in Assessing Bone Health From Adult Hand Radiographs.

Authors:  Erin M R Bigelow; Robert W Goulet; Antonio Ciarelli; Stephen H Schlecht; David H Kohn; Todd L Bredbenner; Sioban D Harlow; Carrie A Karvonen-Gutierrez; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2022-06-29

7.  Tibia functionality and Division II female and male collegiate athletes from multiple sports.

Authors:  Vanessa R Yingling; Benjamin Ferrari-Church; Ariana Strickland
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Differential Adaptive Response of Growing Bones From Two Female Inbred Mouse Strains to Voluntary Cage-Wheel Running.

Authors:  Stephen H Schlecht; Melissa A Ramcharan; Yueqin Yang; Lauren M Smith; Erin Mr Bigelow; Bonnie T Nolan; Drew E Moss; Maureen J Devlin; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2018-02-12

Review 9.  Evolutionary Perspectives on the Developing Skeleton and Implications for Lifelong Health.

Authors:  Alexandra E Kralick; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.555

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.