Literature DB >> 12206291

The effect of background noise on P300 to suprathreshold stimuli.

Dean F Salisbury1, Massimo A Desantis, Martha E Shenton, Robert W McCarley.   

Abstract

Both the amplitude and latency of P300 vary with changes in stimulus parameters. Stimuli at intensities or pitch separations near threshold evoke a smaller and later P300. P300 is also affected by extraneous stimulus parameters in tasks where stimulus frequency separation is large and stimuli are well above intensity thresholds. For example, the presence of background white noise when tones are suprathreshold and easily detectable has been reported to increase P300 latency. However, the effects of background masking noise on P300 amplitude and scalp topography have not been reported. Subjects performed an oddball task both in the presence and in the absence of background noise. Performance accuracy was unaffected by background noise. P300 showed latency increases when noise was present, but P300 peak amplitude was unaffected. P300 scalp topography was stable across both conditions. P300 latency is affected by background noise, even when performance is not, but amplitude and amplitude topography remain unaffected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12206291      PMCID: PMC2647509          DOI: 10.1017/S0048577202010223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  17 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli.

Authors:  J Polich
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-07

3.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time.

Authors:  M Kutas; G McCarthy; E Donchin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A triarchic model of P300 amplitude.

Authors:  R Johnson
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Some features of the auditory evoked response in schizophrenics.

Authors:  W T Roth; E H Cannon
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1972-10

6.  Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty.

Authors:  S Sutton; M Braren; J Zubin; E R John
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP.

Authors:  H V Semlitsch; P Anderer; P Schuster; O Presslich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Evoked potential correlates of auditory signal detection.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; K C Squires; J W Bauer; P H Lindsay
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Effects of perceptual and cognitive difficulty on P3 and RT in young and old adults.

Authors:  J M Ford; A Pfefferbaum; J R Tinklenberg; B S Kopell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-09

10.  Stimulus frequency and masking as determinants of P300 latency in event-related potentials from auditory stimuli.

Authors:  J Polich; L Howard; A Starr
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.251

View more
  9 in total

1.  The effects of syntactic complexity on processing sentences in noise.

Authors:  Rebecca Carroll; Esther Ruigendijk
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-04

2.  Cortical signal-in-noise coding varies by noise type, signal-to-noise ratio, age, and hearing status.

Authors:  Nashrah Maamor; Curtis J Billings
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Effects of age, age-related hearing loss, and contralateral cafeteria noise on the discrimination of small frequency changes: psychoacoustic and electrophysiological measures.

Authors:  Sibylle Bertoli; Jacek Smurzynski; Rudolf Probst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

4.  Low-arousal speech noise improves performance in N-back task: an ERP study.

Authors:  Longzhu Han; Yunzhe Liu; Dandan Zhang; Yi Jin; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Impaired selective attention in patients with severe primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Mohamed N Thabit; Ahmed M Abd Elhamed
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2021-10-07

6.  "Sound" Decisions: The Combined Role of Ambient Noise and Cognitive Regulation on the Neurophysiology of Food Cravings.

Authors:  Danni Peng-Li; Patricia Alves Da Mota; Camile Maria Costa Correa; Raymond C K Chan; Derek Victor Byrne; Qian Janice Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Contralateral Noise Stimulation Delays P300 Latency in School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Thalita Ubiali; Milaine Dominici Sanfins; Leticia Reis Borges; Maria Francisca Colella-Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of contralateral stimulation on acoustic reflectance measurements.

Authors:  Tathiany Silva Pichelli; Jordana Costa Soares; Bruna Carla Cibin; Renata Mota Mamede Carvallo
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-21

9.  P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise.

Authors:  Camila Gonçalves Polo Massa; Camila Maia Rabelo; Renata Rodrigues Moreira; Carla Gentile Matas; Eliane Schochat; Alessandra Giannella Samelli
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.