Literature DB >> 22460245

Prospective experience with contingent screening strategy for Down syndrome in Estonia.

Kai Muru1, Mari Sitska, Karin Asser, Aivar Ehrenberg, Helle Karro, Katrin Ounap, Tiia Reimand.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish the first-trimester screening for Down syndrome (DS) in Estonia and to evaluate the potential of a contingent screening in the population of pregnant women. A prospective cohort study included non-selected pregnancies during the programme of first-trimester screening for DS in a 4-year period at a single centre. The following screening tests were evaluated: measurement of nuchal translucency (NT) and serum screening [pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (fβ-HCG)]; results were given as combined screening. After first-trimester screening, contingent screening protocol was used, and women were divided into three groups: high risk, low risk and an intermediate risk group. In the last group, a second-trimester triple test (AFP; total HCG and uE3) was also performed. The study group consisted of 3,194 non-selected pregnancies. In 1,387 (43.4%) women, first-trimester serum screening showed low risk (risk ≤ 1:5,000), and no future testing was performed, in 30 (0.9%) women screening test showed high risk (risk ≥ 1:50) and a diagnostic test was offered, and in 1,777 (55.7%) women repeated risk calculation in the second trimester was done. During the study period, there were 17 cases of trisomy 21, of which 15 (88.3%) were detected with the described screening programme. In conclusion, two-step contingent sequential screening is a better choice for Down syndrome screening in Estonia instead of previously used second-trimester screening, and it offers the advantage of earlier diagnosis.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22460245      PMCID: PMC3185994          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-010-0020-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  19 in total

1.  Three-stage contingent screening for Down syndrome.

Authors:  Dave Wright; Ian Bradbury; Howard Cuckle; Jason Gardosi; Ann Tonks; Sue Standing; Peter Benn
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Screening for Down's syndrome--too many choices?

Authors:  Michael T Mennuti; Deborah A Driscoll
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Sequential and contingent prenatal screening for Down syndrome.

Authors:  Nicholas J Wald; Alicja R Rudnicka; Jonathan P Bestwick
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Practical strategies in contingent sequential screening for Down syndrome.

Authors:  Peter Benn; Dave Wright; Howard Cuckle
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Multicenter study of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk-orientated two-stage first-trimester screening.

Authors:  K H Nicolaides; K Spencer; K Avgidou; S Faiola; O Falcon
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  First-trimester Down syndrome screening performance in the Dutch population; how to achieve further improvement?

Authors:  E J Wortelboer; M P H Koster; Ph Stoutenbeek; L H Elvers; J G Loeber; G H A Visser; P C J I Schielen
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 7.  [Down syndrome screening in France: the worst consensus].

Authors:  P Rozenberg; L Bussières; M-V Senat
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2007-02-06

8.  First-trimester contingent screening for Down syndrome can reduce the number of nuchal translucency measurements required.

Authors:  Thenmalar Vadiveloo; Jennifer A Crossley; David A Aitken
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  K H Nicolaides; G Azar; D Byrne; C Mansur; K Marks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-04-04

10.  Combined ultrasound and biochemical screening for Down's syndrome in the first trimester: a Scottish multicentre study.

Authors:  Jennifer A Crossley; David A Aitken; Alan D Cameron; Elizabeth McBride; J Michael Connor
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Two kinds of common prenatal screening tests for Down's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Yao; Yang Liao; Mei Han; Sheng-Lan Li; Juan Luo; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.