Literature DB >> 15736186

Multicenter study of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk-orientated two-stage first-trimester screening.

K H Nicolaides1, K Spencer, K Avgidou, S Faiola, O Falcon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 by a combination of maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency (NT) and maternal serum free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A). In addition, the potential impact of a new individual risk-orientated two-stage approach to first-trimester screening was examined.
METHODS: First-trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 was carried out in 75 821 singleton pregnancies with live fetuses at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 gestational weeks. The detection and false-positive rates for different risk cut-offs were calculated. To examine the potential impact of an individual risk-orientated two-stage approach to first-trimester screening it was assumed that, after first-trimester combined screening, chorionic villus sampling (CVS) would be performed in all patients with a risk estimate of 1 in 100 or more and in none of those with a risk estimate of less than 1 in 1000. Those in the intermediate-risk category, with a risk estimate of between 1 in 101 and 1 in 1000, would have further assessment of risk by first-trimester ultrasound examination to determine presence/absence of the nasal bone, presence/absence of tricuspid regurgitation or normal/abnormal Doppler velocity waveform in the ductus venosus, and CVS would be performed if their adjusted risk became 1 in 100 or more.
RESULTS: Fetal NT and maternal serum free beta-hCG and PAPP-A were successfully measured in all cases. The median maternal age was 31 (range, 13-49) years, the median gestation at screening was 12 (range, 11 + 0 to 13 + 6) weeks and the median fetal crown-rump length was 62 (range, 45-84) mm. Chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 544 pregnancies, including 325 cases of trisomy 21. The estimated risk for trisomy 21 was 1 in 300 or greater in 5.2% of normal pregnancies, in 92.6% of those with trisomy 21, in 88.5% of those with trisomy 18 or 13 and in 85.6% of those with other chromosomal defects. The detection rates for trisomy 21 were about 75% and 80% for respective false-positive rates of 1% and 2%. In the proposed individual risk-orientated two-stage screening for a risk cut-off of 1 in 100 the total false-positive rate would vary with the method used for the second stage of screening from 2.1% for absence of the nasal bone to 2.7% for increased impedance in the ductus venosus and 2.7% for tricuspid regurgitation and the respective detection rates would be 92.0%, 94.2% and 91.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: First-trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 is associated with a detection rate of about 90% for a false-positive rate of 5%. Individual risk-orientated two-stage screening for trisomy 21 can potentially identify, in the first trimester of pregnancy, more than 90% of affected fetuses for a false-positive rate of 2-3%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15736186     DOI: 10.1002/uog.1860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  35 in total

1.  Retrospective study evaluating the performance of a first-trimester combined screening for trisomy 21 in an Italian unselected population.

Authors:  Francesco Padula; Pietro Cignini; Diana Giannarelli; Cristiana Brizzi; Claudio Coco; Laura D'Emidio; Elsa Giorgio; Maurizio Giorlandino; Lucia Mangiafico; Marialuisa Mastrandrea; Vincenzo Milite; Luisa Mobili; Cinzia Nanni; Raffaella Raffio; Cinzia Taramanni; Roberto Vigna; Alvaro Mesoraca; Domenico Bizzoco; Ivan Gabrielli; Gianluca Di Giacomo; Maria Antonietta Barone; Antonella Cima; Francesca Romana Giorlandino; Sabrina Emili; Marina Cupellaro; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

2.  Prenatal testing for Down syndrome: comparison of screening practices in the UK and USA.

Authors:  Dagmar Tapon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  First-trimester combined screening is effective for the detection of unbalanced chromosomal translocations at 11 to 12 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Shangyu Huang; Chialin Chang; Pojen Cheng; Chinghua Hsiao; Yungkuei Soong; Tao Duan
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 4.  Biomarkers for ectopic pregnancy and pregnancy of unknown location.

Authors:  Suneeta Senapati; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

6.  Prospective experience with contingent screening strategy for Down syndrome in Estonia.

Authors:  Kai Muru; Mari Sitska; Karin Asser; Aivar Ehrenberg; Helle Karro; Katrin Ounap; Tiia Reimand
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-10-02

7.  Pregnancy Outcome of Abnormal Nuchal Translucency: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nasibeh Roozbeh; Maryam Azizi; Leili Darvish
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

8.  Utilizing two-tiered screening for early detection of autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Meena Khowaja; Diana L Robins; Lauren B Adamson
Journal:  Autism       Date:  2017-09-14

9.  Prenatal Risk Calculation (PRC) 3.0: An Extended DoE-Based First-Trimester Screening Algorithm Allowing For Early Blood Sampling.

Authors:  E Merz; C Thode; B Eiben; S Wellek
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2016-02-23

10.  The assessment of nuchal translucency and serum markers for down syndrome screening with ductus venosus Doppler measurements in the first trimester.

Authors:  Ozlem Ozer; Cenk N Sayın; Füsun G Varol
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2010-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.