Literature DB >> 16049988

Practical strategies in contingent sequential screening for Down syndrome.

Peter Benn1, Dave Wright, Howard Cuckle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To design and assess the performance of protocols for contingent sequential Down syndrome screening that can be implemented in practice.
METHODS: Protocols were designed in which all women received first-trimester measurement of nuchal translucency (NT) together with maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and either free beta- or total human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). Those women with borderline Down syndrome risks received follow-up second-trimester maternal serum involving double, triple, or quadruple serum screening markers: alpha-fetoprotein, free beta-hCG or total hCG, unconjugated estriol and inhibin-A. Specific ranges of risks were used to define the borderline group. Separate protocols were developed for the United Kingdom and the United States to reflect differences in commonly used tests, cut-offs, and the gestational age at testing. Detection rates and false-positive rates were estimated by multivariate Gaussian modelling with Monte Carlo simulation.
RESULTS: Proposed protocols based on first-trimester NT, PAPP-A and free beta-hCG or total hCG, followed by selective use of second-trimester quadruple markers can result in a 91% detection rate and 2.1% false-positive rate for the United Kingdom and a detection rate of 89% and false-positive rate of 3.1% for the United States. For both countries, over 60% of affected pregnancies would be detected in the first trimester and less than 20% of women would require a second-trimester Down syndrome risk assessment. Use of alternative cut-offs to define those with borderline risks or different combinations of second-trimester markers also yielded high detection rates and low false-positive rates.
CONCLUSION: With appropriate patient counselling, it should be possible to provide highly effective Down syndrome screening using contingent sequential protocols. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16049988     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  11 in total

Review 1.  First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 2.  First and second trimester serum tests with and without first trimester ultrasound tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

3.  Prospective experience with contingent screening strategy for Down syndrome in Estonia.

Authors:  Kai Muru; Mari Sitska; Karin Asser; Aivar Ehrenberg; Helle Karro; Katrin Ounap; Tiia Reimand
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-10-02

4.  Sequential Down syndrome screening: the importance of first and second trimester test correlations when calculating risk.

Authors:  Peter Benn; Alan E Donnenfeld
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Second trimester serum tests for Down's Syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Jonathan J Deeks; Boliang Guo; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

Review 6.  First trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-30

Review 7.  Urine tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Boliang Guo; Yemisi Takwoingi; Mary Pennant; Susanna Wisniewski; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-10

8.  First trimester diagnosis and screening for fetal aneuploidy.

Authors:  Deborah A Driscoll; Susan J Gross
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Comparison of different strategies in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: cost effectiveness analysis of computer simulation.

Authors:  Jean Gekas; Geneviève Gagné; Emmanuel Bujold; Daniel Douillard; Jean-Claude Forest; Daniel Reinharz; François Rousseau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-02-13

10.  An Economic Analysis of Cell-Free DNA Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in the US General Pregnancy Population.

Authors:  Peter Benn; Kirsten J Curnow; Steven Chapman; Steven N Michalopoulos; John Hornberger; Matthew Rabinowitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.