Literature DB >> 22459948

Characterizing the compression-dependent viscoelastic properties of human hepatic pathologies using dynamic compression testing.

Ryan J DeWall1, Shyam Bharat, Tomy Varghese, Meghan E Hanson, Rashmi M Agni, Mark A Kliewer.   

Abstract

Recent advances in elastography have provided several imaging modalities capable of quantifying the elasticity of tissue, an intrinsic tissue property. This information is useful for determining tumour margins and may also be useful for diagnosing specific tumour types. In this study, we used dynamic compression testing to quantify the viscoelastic properties of 16 human hepatic primary and secondary malignancies and their corresponding background tissue obtained following surgical resection. Two additional backgrounds were also tested. An analysis of the background tissue showed that F4-graded fibrotic liver tissue was significantly stiffer than F0-graded tissue, with a modulus contrast of 4:1. Steatotic liver tissue was slightly stiffer than normal liver tissue, but not significantly so. The tumour-to-background storage modulus contrast of hepatocellular carcinomas, a primary tumour, was approximately 1:1, and the contrast decreased with increasing fibrosis grade of the background tissue. Ramp testing showed that the background stiffness increased faster than the malignant tissue. Conversely, secondary tumours were typically much stiffer than the surrounding background, with a tumour-to-background contrast of 10:1 for colon metastases and 10:1 for cholangiocarcinomas. Ramp testing showed that colon metastases stiffened faster than their corresponding backgrounds. These data have provided insights into the mechanical properties of specific tumour types, which may prove beneficial as the use of quantitative stiffness imaging increases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22459948      PMCID: PMC3368585          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/8/2273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  31 in total

1.  Elastic modulus measurements of human liver and correlation with pathology.

Authors:  Wen-Chun Yeh; Pai-Chi Li; Yung-Ming Jeng; Hey-Chi Hsu; Po-Ling Kuo; Meng-Lin Li; Pei-Ming Yang; Po-Huang Lee
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Quantifying local stiffness variations in radiofrequency ablations with dynamic indentation.

Authors:  Ryan J DeWall; Tomy Varghese; Christopher L Brace
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Effects of perfusion on the viscoelastic characteristics of liver.

Authors:  Amy E Kerdok; Mark P Ottensmeyer; Robert D Howe
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Viscoelastic characterization of in vitro canine tissue.

Authors:  Miklos Z Kiss; Tomy Varghese; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Segmentation of elastographic images using a coarse-to-fine active contour model.

Authors:  Wu Liu; James A Zagzebski; Tomy Varghese; Charles R Dyer; Udomchai Techavipoo; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Objective evaluation of liver consistency to estimate hepatic fibrosis and functional reserve for hepatectomy.

Authors:  K Kusaka; Y Harihara; G Torzilli; K Kubota; T Takayama; M Makuuchi; M Mori; S Omata
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Frequency-dependent complex modulus of the uterus: preliminary results.

Authors:  Miklos Z Kiss; Maritza A Hobson; Tomy Varghese; Josephine Harter; Mark A Kliewer; Ellen M Hartenbach; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  In vivo breast tumor detection using transient elastography.

Authors:  J Bercoff; S Chaffai; M Tanter; L Sandrin; S Catheline; M Fink; J L Gennisson; M Meunier
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Liver fibrosis: non-invasive assessment with MR elastography.

Authors:  Laurent Huwart; Frank Peeters; Ralph Sinkus; Laurence Annet; Najat Salameh; Leon C ter Beek; Yves Horsmans; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis.

Authors:  Laurent Sandrin; Bertrand Fourquet; Jean-Michel Hasquenoph; Sylvain Yon; Céline Fournier; Frédéric Mal; Christos Christidis; Marianne Ziol; Bruno Poulet; Farad Kazemi; Michel Beaugrand; Robert Palau
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  10 in total

1.  Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis using ultrasound-based shear wave measurement and comparison to magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Heng Zhao; Jun Chen; Duane D Meixner; Hua Xie; Vijay Shamdasani; Shiwei Zhou; Jean-Luc Robert; Matthew W Urban; William Sanchez; Matthew R Callstrom; Richard L Ehman; James F Greenleaf; Shigao Chen
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Visualizing ex vivo radiofrequency and microwave ablation zones using electrode vibration elastography.

Authors:  Ryan J Dewall; Tomy Varghese; Chris L Brace
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Comparison of three dimensional strain volume reconstructions using SOUPR and wobbler based acquisitions: A phantom study.

Authors:  Wenjun Yang; Atul Ingle; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Ex Vivo characterization of canine liver tissue viscoelasticity after high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation.

Authors:  Danial Shahmirzadi; Gary Y Hou; Jiangang Chen; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Post-Procedure Evaluation of Microwave Ablations of Hepatocellular Carcinomas Using Electrode Displacement Elastography.

Authors:  Wenjun Yang; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Tomy Varghese; Marci L Alexander; Nicholas Rubert; Atul N Ingle; Meghan G Lubner; James L Hinshaw; Shane A Wells; Fred T Lee; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Differentiation of benign and malignant focal liver lesions: value of virtual touch tissue quantification of acoustic radiation force impulse elastography.

Authors:  Le-Hang Guo; Shu-Jun Wang; Hui-Xiong Xu; Li-Ping Sun; Yi-Feng Zhang; Jun-Mei Xu; Jian Wu; Hui-Jun Fu; Xiao-Hong Xu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  In Vivo Models for the Performance and Safety of BAT-90, a Novel 90-Yttrium-based Internal Radiotherapy Platform.

Authors:  Antonino Amato; Gordon McVie; Giovanni Paganelli; Pier Luigi Carriero; Roberto Cianni; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Modeling Ramp-hold Indentation Measurements based on Kelvin-Voigt Fractional Derivative Model.

Authors:  HongMei Zhang; QingZhe Zhang; LiTao Ruan; JunBo Duan; MingXi Wan; Michael F Insana; HongMei Zhang; QingZhe Zhang; LiTao Ruan; JunBo Duan; MingXi Wan; Michael F Insana
Journal:  Meas Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.046

9.  Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for focal hepatic tumors: usefulness for differentiating hemangiomas from malignant tumors.

Authors:  Ji Eun Kim; Jae Young Lee; Kyung Soo Bae; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Elastic free energy drives the shape of prevascular solid tumors.

Authors:  K L Mills; Ralf Kemkemer; Shiva Rudraraju; Krishna Garikipati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.