Literature DB >> 30250357

Modeling Ramp-hold Indentation Measurements based on Kelvin-Voigt Fractional Derivative Model.

HongMei Zhang1, QingZhe Zhang2, LiTao Ruan3, JunBo Duan1, MingXi Wan1, Michael F Insana4, HongMei Zhang1, QingZhe Zhang2, LiTao Ruan3, JunBo Duan1, MingXi Wan1, Michael F Insana4.   

Abstract

Interpretation of experimental data from micro- and nano-scale indentation testing is highly dependent on the constitutive model selected to relate measurements to mechanical properties. The Kelvin-Voigt Fractional Derivative model (KVFD) offers a compact set of viscoelastic features appropriate for characterizing soft biological materials. This paper provides a set of KVFD solutions for converting indentation testing data acquired for different geometries and scales into viscoelastic properties of soft materials. These solutions, which are mostly in closed-form, apply to ramp-hold relaxation, load-unload and ramp-load creep-testing protocols. We report on applications of these model solutions to macro- and nano-indentation testing of hydrogels, gastric cancer cells and ex vivo breast tissue samples using an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). We also applied KVFD models to clinical ultrasonic breast data using a compression plate as required for elasticity imaging. Together the results show that KVFD models fit a broad range of experimental data with a correlation coefficient typically R2 > 0.99. For hydrogel samples, estimation of KVFD model parameters from test data using spherical indentation versus plate compression as well as ramp relaxation versus load-unload compression all agree within one standard deviation. Results from measurements made using macro- and nano-scale indentation agree in trend. For gastric cell and ex vivo breast tissue measurements, KVFD moduli are, respectively, 1/3 - 1/2 and 1/6 of the elasticity modulus found from the Sneddon model. In vivo breast tissue measurements yield model parameters consistent with literature results. The consistency of results found for a broad range of experimental parameters suggest the KVFD model is a reliable tool for exploring intrinsic features of the cell/tissue microenvironments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AFM measurements; KVFD models; hydrogels; ramp-hold indentation; tissue samples

Year:  2018        PMID: 30250357      PMCID: PMC6150487          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/aa9daf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Meas Sci Technol        ISSN: 0957-0233            Impact factor:   2.046


  29 in total

1.  Real-time regularized ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Hassan Rivaz; Emad M Boctor; Michael A Choti; Gregory D Hager
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Viscoelastic characterization of in vitro canine tissue.

Authors:  Miklos Z Kiss; Tomy Varghese; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  The fractional viscoelastic response of human breast tissue cells.

Authors:  B Carmichael; H Babahosseini; S N Mahmoodi; M Agah
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 4.  Nanobiomechanics of living cells: a review.

Authors:  Jinju Chen
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  The compressive mechanical properties of diabetic and non-diabetic plantar soft tissue.

Authors:  Shruti Pai; William R Ledoux
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples.

Authors:  Abbas Samani; Judit Zubovits; Donald Plewes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Automated Compression Device for Viscoelasticity Imaging.

Authors:  Alireza Nabavizadeh; Randall R Kinnick; Mahdi Bayat; Carolina Amador; Matthew W Urban; Azra Alizad; Mostafa Fatemi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Assessing composition and structure of soft biphasic media from Kelvin-Voigt fractional derivative model parameters.

Authors:  Hong Mei Zhang; Yue Wang; Mostafa Fatemi; Michael F Insana
Journal:  Meas Sci Technol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.046

9.  Fractional derivative models for ultrasonic characterization of polymer and breast tissue viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Cecile Coussot; Sureshkumar Kalyanam; Rebecca Yapp; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Ultrasonic viscoelasticity imaging of nonpalpable breast tumors: preliminary results.

Authors:  Yupeng Qiu; Mallika Sridhar; Jean K Tsou; Karen K Lindfors; Michael F Insana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  2 in total

1.  Wave-based optical coherence elastography: The 10-year perspective.

Authors:  Fernando Zvietcovich; Kirill V Larin
Journal:  Prog Biomed Eng (Bristol)       Date:  2022-01-14

2.  Viscoelasticity in simple indentation-cycle experiments: a computational study.

Authors:  Yu M Efremov; S L Kotova; P S Timashev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.