Multimodal imaging and detection strategy with 124 I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody cG250 for accurate localization and confirmation of extent of disease during laparoscopic and open surgical resection of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for approximately 85% to 90% of all primary kidney malignancies, with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) constituting approximately 70% to 85% of all RCCs. This study describes an innovative multimodal imaging and detection strategy that uses (124)I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody G250 ((124)I-cG250) for accurate preoperative and intraoperative localization and confirmation of extent of disease for both laparoscopic and open surgical resection of ccRCC. Two cases presented herein highlight how this technology can potentially guide complete surgical resection and confirm complete removal of all diseased tissues. This innovative (124)I-cG250 (ie, (124)I-girentuximab) multimodal imaging and detection approach, which would be clinically very useful to urologic surgeons, urologic medical oncologists, nuclear medicine physicians, radiologists, and pathologists who are involved in the care of ccRCC patients, holds great potential for improving the diagnostic accuracy, operative planning and approach, verification of disease resection, and monitoring for evidence of disease recurrence in ccRCC patients.

Introduction

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which arises from the renal tubular epithelial cells,[1-4] accounts for approximately 85% to 90% of all primary kidney malignancies.[5-7] Clear cell RCC (ccRCC) constitutes approximately 70% to 85% of all RCCs, followed by papillary RCC (8% to 15%), chromophobe RCC (2% to 5%), and a variety of other rare histologic subtypes.[8-14]

In 1986, the IgG monoclonal antibody (mAb) Grawitz 250 (G250) was first described in the literature by Oosterwijk et al[15,16] at the University of Leiden in The Netherlands. Of historical interest, the basis of the name Grawitz 250 is best explained by the developer of this mAb (Egbert Oosterwijk, personal communication, July 11 and October 26, 2011). Mice were immunized with kidney tumor homogenates, and all the hybridoma clones derived from the mice were named in consecutive series with the letter G, followed by a number. The letter G was selected by Oosterwijk to stand for Grawitz, in recognition of Paul Albert Grawitz (1850-1932), a German pathologist and professor at the University of Greifswald from 1886 to 1921, who is credited in the urologic literature with the first description of RCC in 1883 (ie, Grawitz’s tumor).[17,18] The number 250 simply represented the fact that this particular hybridoma clone was the 250th hybridoma clone derived from mice immunized with kidney tumor homogenates, thus forming the basis of the derivation for the name Grawitz 250 (ie, G250). Even at its inception in 1986, Oosterwijk et al[15] clearly recognized the great potential of G250 for radioimmunoimaging.

Monoclonal antibody G250 recognizes the antigen carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX).[16,19] CA IX antigen is a cytosolic transmembrane glycoprotein.[19-21] It represents one of many carbonic anhydrase enzymes that are involved in catalyzing the reaction CO2 + H2O ↔ HCO3− + H+, a process ultimately important in the regulation of proton flux in cells and in pH regulation.[19,20] The catalytic site for CA IX is located extracellularly, where it is involved in creating an acidic microenvironment.[19,22] CA IX expression has been shown to be induced by hypoxia,[23,24] and it may have prognostic implications for evaluating disease progression and response to therapy.[21,25,26]

It is well established that CA IX antigen is constitutively expressed by 97% to 98% of all ccRCC,[15,16,19,21,25,27-29] in both primary and metastatic disease.[15,16,19,21,25,27-29] Yet it is absent from normal kidney tissues, including normal adult proximal tubular epithelial cells and fetal kidney tissue.[15,16,19,27-29] Likewise, it is more minimally expressed or absent in other, much less common renal epithelial neoplasms, including papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, and oncocytoma.[21] A variety of other tumors (ie, carcinomas of the uterine cervix, esophagus, colon, lung, breast, brain, and vulva)[19,27] and normal adult human tissues (ie, gastric mucosa, small intestinal mucosal crypts, liver, and pancreatobiliary epithelium)[15,21,28,29] have been shown to have varying degrees of CA IX expression. However, this is generally to a much lesser degree than is seen in ccRCC and has greater heterogeneity. CA IX expression has not been demonstrated in normal heart, lung, prostate, brain, muscle, peripheral blood, or placenta.[29]

The use of mAb G250 for the targeting of CA IX in ccRCC, and the resultant potential application related to radioimmunoimaging and various radioimmunotherapies, has long been recognized by Oosterwijk and colleagues.[15,16,19,30] In 1993, Oosterwijk et al[31] first reported on a phase I trial of 131I-labeled murine mAb G250 (mG250) administered intravenously to preoperative patients with a clinical diagnosis of RCC, demonstrating safety and tumor localization by radioimmunoscintigraphy using whole-body planar gamma camera imaging in all patients with RCC expressing CA IX.[31] However, the occurrence of human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) in all the patients studied was thought to be a potential stumbling block for the use of mG250 for serial radioimmunoimaging and multiple-treatment radioimmunotherapy. To minimize the occurrence of HAMA response, a chimerized version of mAb G250 (cG250) was developed with the same affinity and binding characteristics as mG250.[30,32] In 1997, Steffens et al[32] reported on a phase I trial of 131I-cG250 administered intravenously to preoperative patients with a clinical diagnosis of primary RCC, demonstrating safety and tumor localization by radioimmunoscintigraphy using whole-body planar gamma camera imaging in all patients with RCC expressing CA IX.[32] However, subsequent similar trials using 131I-cG250 to assess radioimmunoscintigraphy with whole-body planar gamma camera imaging in patients with metastatic RCC revealed more variability in the reported degree of successful disease localization, ranging from 30% to 100%,[33-37] despite the fact that all these publications were reported by the same group of authors. This greater variability in the reported success of disease localization in patients with metastatic RCC may have been more a reflection of the limitation of the variability in the gamma camera imaging technology used during different phases of their investigations rather than that of the mAb G250 itself.

With continued improvements in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) technology, and the great potential for the use of the positron emitter 124I with this technology,[38,39] increased interest has developed in the application of 124I-cG250 for radioguided imaging and detection of ccRCC.[40,41] In 2007, Divgi et al[40] first reported on a pilot, phase I trial using intravenously administered 124I-cG250 to assess preoperative PET/CT localization of kidney tumors in patients scheduled for surgical resection.[40] They found that 15 out of 16 (94%) ccRCCs were identified with 124 I-cG250 on PET/CT, whereas all 9 non-ccRCCs were nonvisualized.[40] In this regard, a larger, multi-institutional phase III industry-sponsored clinical trial[42-44] using 124I-cG250 (ie, 124I-girentuximab), in which The Ohio State University Medical Center (OSUMC) participated, has been subsequently undertaken and patient accrual completed. The initial reported results from this multi-institutional phase III industry-sponsored clinical trial have shown superiority of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging over that of diagnostic CT imaging in the diagnosis of ccRCC.[44]

Most recently, the use of handheld radiation detection probe technology for intraoperative detection and localization of ccRCC using 124I-cG250 and specimen PET/CT imaging of resected surgical specimens has been described in the literature.[45-47] Along similar lines, a comprehensive methodology of multimodal imaging and detection during 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-directed surgery for patients with known or suspected 18F-FDG-avid malignancies has been previously described.[48-51] However, to date, an analogous multimodal imaging and detection approach for 124I-cG250-directed surgery is yet to be reported.

To this point, the current report describes an innovative multimodal imaging and detection methodology that uses 124I-cG250 for accurate preoperative and intraoperative localization and confirmation of extent of disease in both laparoscopic and open surgical resection of ccRCC. The 2 cases presented herein highlight this technology. In one case, this innovative strategy during a laparoscopic approach to ccRCC was instrumental in the intraoperative identification of all diseased tissues (including a retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis), in guiding complete surgical resection, and in the confirmation of complete removal of all diseased tissues, thus allowing for successful laparoscopic resection of both the primary and the metastatic sites of disease, which otherwise would not have been technically feasible. In the other case, this innovative strategy during an open right partial nephrectomy was instrumental in guiding complete surgical resection, in the confirmation of complete removal of the tumor, and in the assessment of the kidney parenchyma surgical resection margin.

Case Reports

Both patients were enrolled at OSUMC in a multi-institutional phase III industry-sponsored clinical trial (Wilex AG, Munich, Germany) comparing 124I-based PET/CT imaging versus diagnostic CT imaging for the detection of ccRCC in presurgical patients with renal masses using 124I-cG250.[42-44] As with any industry-sponsored clinical trial conducted at OSUMC, the protocol was reviewed by the OSUMC Office of Responsible Research Practices and reviewed and approved by the Western Institutional Review Board (Olympia, WA). The radiolabeling of cG250 with 124I was performed by IBA Molecular North American (Richmond, VA).

Case 1

A 60-year-old Caucasian male with a history of Ollier disease (a rare, nonhereditary, sporadic disorder characterized by multiple intraosseous benign cartilaginous tumors) presented with a right renal mass that was found at the time of a work-up for painless hematuria. CT scan of the abdomen showed a 10.3 cm × 7.6 cm × 6.7 cm mass in the superior pole of the right kidney, with infiltration into the posterior hilum of the upper renal pole (Figure 1). Retrograde cystoscopy was completely negative.

Figure 1.

Diagnostic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen (axial view) showing a solid mass in the superior pole of the right kidney (red arrow). This lesion demonstrated contrast enhancement with delayed washout having a density prior to intravenous contrast of 30 Hounsfield units (HU), 150 HU after contrast administration, and 58 HU in the excretion phase, suspicious for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. In retrospect, the small retroperitoneal lymph node (yellow arrow), which was not originally identified in the initial interpretation of the prior contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen or the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, was later first identified on 124I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody G250 PET/CT and proven to represent a retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis by light microscopy.

18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was performed during concomitant work-up of a suspicious left femoral head/neck lesion related to the patient’s Ollier disease. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was performed 89 minutes following intravenous administration of 15.3 mCi of 18F-FDG (Figure 2). The attenuation correction non-contrast-enhanced CT portion of the 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging showed a large mass arising from the superior pole of the right kidney, with 18F-FDG activity less than or equal to that of the normal 18F-FDG accumulation pattern within the remainder of either kidney. Mild, increased 18F-FDG activity was seen in the left femoral head and neck region. No obvious sites of metastatic disease were originally identified in the initial interpretation of the 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging.

Figure 2.

Maximum-intensity projection image (A), axial 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) images (B and E), axial attenuation correction non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images for 18F-FDG PET localization (C and F), and fused axial 18F-FDG PET/CT images (D and G) demonstrating physiologic renal 18F-FDG activity (A, B, D, E, and G; blue arrows) and showing a mass on the attenuation correction non-contrast-enhanced CT (C; red arrow) that corresponds to the mass seen on the prior diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen in Figure 1. Note that the amount of 18F-FDG activity within the mass (A, B, and D; red arrows) was less than or equal to that of the normal 18F-FDG accumulation pattern within the remainder of either kidney. In retrospect, the small retroperitoneal lymph node (A, E, F, and G; yellow arrows), which was not originally identified in the initial interpretation of the prior diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen or the 18F-FDG PET/CT, was later first identified on 124I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody G250 PET/CT and proven to represent a retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis on light microscopy.

124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging was performed 4 days following intravenous administration of 5.4 mCi of 124I-cG250 (Figure 3). 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging showed increased 124I-cG250 activity within the renal mass in the superior pole of the right kidney, as well as increased 124I-cG250 activity within a retroperitoneal lymph node.

Figure 3.

Maximum-intensity projection image (A), axial 124I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody G250 (124I-cG250) positron emission tomography (PET) images (B and E), axial attenuation correction non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for 124I-cG250 PET localization (C and F), and fused axial 124I-cG250 PET/CT images (D and G) demonstrating significant 124I-cG250 activity in the superior portion of the right kidney (A, B, and D; red arrows) that corresponds to the mass seen on the prior diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen in Figure 1. Note that there is little to no 124I-cG250 accumulation in the normal kidney (B, D, E, and G; blue arrows). Additionally, on 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging, there is increased focal 124I-cG250 activity within a small retroperitoneal lymph node (A, E, and G; yellow arrows), which was not originally identified in the initial interpretation of the prior diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen or the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT. This small retroperitoneal lymph node (A, E, F, and G; yellow arrows) was later successfully identified and resected with the aid of a laparoscopic gamma detection probe at the time of laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

The patient was taken to the operating room and underwent a laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Intraoperatively, a laparoscopic gamma detection probe (Neoprobe Model 2059, Neoprobe Corporation, Dublin, OH) was used to localize and identify all sites of 124I-cG250 uptake, to assist in the surgical resection, and for confirmation of complete removal of all sites of increased 124I-cG250 activity. The laparoscopic gamma detection probe correctly identified increased 124I-cG250 activity, both within the primary tumor of the right kidney and within the adjacent retroperitoneal lymph node tissues and provided confirmation of successful laparoscopic surgical resection.

The intact right radical nephrectomy specimen and the intact retroperitoneal lymph node dissection specimen were imaged with 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging and underwent subsequent standard pathology processing and microscopic evaluation (Figure 4). 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging clearly identified the sites of disease within the intact right radical nephrectomy specimen and the intact retroperitoneal lymph node dissection specimen. Histopathologic evaluation of the right nephrectomy specimen revealed an RCC (Fuhrman grade 3, 10.5 cm × 7.4 cm × 5.8 cm) of the clear cell type with sarcomatoid features. It had surgical resection margins that were negative, including Gerota’s fascia, the renal vessels, and the distal ureter. A total of 5 regional lymph nodes were identified within the retroperitoneal lymph node dissection specimen, with one lymph node metastasis identified and representing a lymph node nearly completely replaced by a tumor that was initially recognized on the preoperative 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging and resected with the assistance of the laparoscopic gamma detection probe.

Figure 4.

Digital photograph of the intact right radical nephrectomy specimen (A) with 124I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody G250 (124I-cG250) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction (B) demonstrating a heterogeneous area of increased 124I-cG250 activity and corresponding to the histopathologically proven clear cell renal cell carcinoma primary tumor (C), as seen on light microscopy (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E]-stained, whole-mount slide, 0.4× magnification). Digital photograph of the intact retroperitoneal lymph node dissection specimen (D) with 124I-cG250 PET/CT 3D reconstruction (E) demonstrating focal increased 124I-cG250 activity and a corresponding single lymph node that was found to contain histopathologically proven metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (F), as seen on light microscopy (H&E-stained, whole-mount slide, 0.3× magnification).

The patient had a relatively uneventful postoperative course and was discharged to home on postoperative day 1. Two weeks later, the patient subsequently underwent an uneventful left proximal femur hemiarthroplasty, which showed a low-grade cartilaginous neoplasm, consistent with his Ollier disease. The patient then went on to participate in the ASSURE (ECOG 2805) clinical trial, representing a randomized, double-blind, multi-institutional, phase III clinical trial comparing adjuvant sorafenib versus adjuvant sunitinib versus placebo in patients with resected RCC. At the time of this publication—30 months after the patient’s previous laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection—the patient is without evidence of disease.

Case 2

A 39-year-old Caucasian female with a previous history of renal calculi presented for evaluation of right flank pain. Ultrasound of the abdomen showed a 1.9 cm × 1.6 cm × 1.4 cm solid-appearing lesion in the inferior pole of the right kidney. CT of the abdomen showed a 2.0 cm × 1.9 cm × 1.9 cm intraparenchymal mass within the posterior cortex of the inferior pole of the right kidney (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Diagnostic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen (axial view) showing a solid mass in the inferior pole of the right kidney (red arrow). This lesion demonstrated contrast enhancement with delayed washout having a density prior to intravenous contrast of 39 Hounsfield units (HU), 111 HU after contrast administration, and 83 HU in the excretion phase, suspicious for clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging was performed 5 days following intravenous administration of 5.2 mCi of 124I-cG250 (Figure 6). 124I PET/CT imaging showed increased 124I-cG250 activity within the renal mass in the inferior pole of the right kidney.

Figure 6.

Maximum-intensity projection image (A), axial 124I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody G250 (124I-cG250) positron emission tomography (PET) image (B), axial attenuation correction non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) for 124I-cG250 PET localization (C), and fused axial 124I-cG250 PET/CT image (D) demonstrating increased 124I-cG250 activity in the inferior pole of the right kidney (A, B, and D; red arrows) that corresponds to the mass seen on the prior diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen in Figure 5. Note that there is little to no 124I-cG250 activity in the remainder of either kidney.

The patient was taken to the operating room and underwent an open right partial nephrectomy of the inferior pole of the right kidney. At the discretion of the surgeon, an intraoperative gamma detection probe was not used in this case.

The intact and bisected right partial nephrectomy specimens were imaged with 124I PET/CT imaging (Figure 7). 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging clearly identified the tumor size and location within the intact and bisected specimens and the relationship of the tumor to the parenchymal surgical resection margin surface within the bisected specimen.

Figure 7.

Digital photograph of the intact right partial nephrectomy specimen (A), with computed tomography (CT) three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction (B) demonstrating an ovoid hyperdensity in the center of the intact specimen and with 124I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody G250 (124I-cG250) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT 3D reconstruction (C) demonstrating an ovoid area of increased 124I-cG250 activity in the center of the intact specimen. Digital photograph of the bisected right partial nephrectomy specimen, grossly demonstrating an ovoid tumor mass (D). The cut-surface edge of the parenchymal surgical resection margin of the right partial nephrectomy specimen was painted with blue ink prior to bisection. The black dashed line in panel A corresponds to the plane of bisection of the right partial nephrectomy specimen in panel D. CT 3D reconstruction of the bisected right partial nephrectomy specimen (E) demonstrates an ovoid hyperdensity in the center of the bisected specimen. The 124I-cG250 PET/CT 3D reconstruction of the bisected right partial nephrectomy specimen (F) demonstrates an ovoid area of increased 124I-cG250 activity, of a similar shape and distribution, in the center of the bisected specimen. The white dotted line in panels D, E, and F represents the cut-surface edge of the blue-inked parenchymal surgical resection margin of the bisected right partial nephrectomy specimen (D). Note that the CT 3D reconstruction image of the bisected specimen (E) and the 124I-cG250 3D PET/CT reconstruction image of the bisected specimen (F) both demonstrate that the ovoid hyperdensity and area of intense 124I-cG250 activity, respectively, do not extend to the parenchymal surgical resection margin surface. Digital microphotograph (G) of the 1.7 cm × 1.5 cm × 1.4 cm clear cell renal cell carcinoma with a negative parenchymal surgical resection margin, as seen on light microscopy (hematoxylin and eosin–stained, whole-mount slide, 0.3× magnification). The black dotted line in panel G represents the cut-surface edge of the parenchymal surgical resection margin of the bisected right partial nephrectomy specimen (D).

The right partial nephrectomy specimen underwent subsequent standard pathology processing and microscopic evaluation (Figure 7). Histopathologic evaluation of the right partial nephrectomy specimen revealed an RCC (Fuhrman grade 2, 1.7 cm × 1.5 cm × 1.4 cm) of the clear cell type. It had negative surgical resection margins, with the closest distance measuring 0.7 cm from the inked parenchymal surgical resection margin surface of the right partial nephrectomy specimen, which correlated well with the 124I-cG250 PET/CT image of the bisected right partial nephrectomy specimen.

The patient had a relatively uneventful postoperative course and was discharged to home on postoperative day 2. The patient required no postoperative adjuvant therapies. At the time of this publication—36 months after her previous open right partial nephrectomy—the patient is without evidence of disease.

Discussion

18F-FDG PET/CT imaging is currently considered the standard of care for the molecular imaging of many solid malignancies.[52-57] However, 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging has the inherent limitation of being non-cancer-specific, resulting in the accumulation of 18F-FDG in many non-cancer-bearing tissues, including accumulation within tissues representing benign disease processes (ie, infection, inflammation, and trauma) and within normal tissues (ie, brain, heart, mucosa and smooth muscle of the stomach, small intestines and colon, thyroid, liver, spleen, kidneys, ureters, and bladder) that have a normal physiologic propensity to accumulate 18F-FDG.[52-56,58-65] As a result of this inherent limitation of 18F-FDG, the specificity and sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT for cancer imaging have been negatively affected. This is especially evident for certain cancer types (ie, RCC, bladder cancer, and prostate cancer) that typically are located in close proximity to anatomic structures with high physiologic 18F-FDG activity (ie, kidneys, ureters, and bladder). This negative effect on the specificity and sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT for cancer imaging is truly a reflection of an intrinsic challenge of such imaging as it relates to the issue of background activity and is not necessarily a reflection of the available signal.[66] This intrinsic background activity dilemma remains the major limiting factor of 18F-FDG PET/CT for cancer imaging.

In this specific regard, the background activity challenges can be significantly improved on for PET/CT imaging of cancer when one considers coupling a positron-emitting radionuclide, such as 124I, with a molecular targeting agent that is cancer specific, such as cG250, which is nearly ubiquitously and constitutively expressed by all ccRCCs but has low to no expression in most normal adult human tissues. There are exceptions to this rule in normal adult human tissues, such as gastric mucosa, small intestinal mucosal crypts, liver, and pancreatobiliary epithelium, to which the molecular targeting agent cG250 can bind, but generally to more varying and less intense degrees than seen with ccRCC.[15,21,28,29] To his great credit, the potential of mAb G250 for targeting CA IX in ccRCC and for use in various radioimmunoimaging and radioimmunotherapy applications has long been recognized by Oosterwijk.[15,16,19,30]

The development of an innovative multimodal imaging and detection strategy that effectively uses 124I-cG250 for the management of ccRCC would be clinically very useful to urologic surgeons, urologic medical oncologists, nuclear medicine physicians, radiologists, and pathologists who are involved in the care of ccRCC patients.[46] This innovative 124I-cG250 multimodal imaging and detection methodology could potentially be instrumental in (a) accurately localizing and identifying all sites of disease and the extent of disease, (b) assisting in the surgical resection and confirmation of complete removal of all sites of disease, and (c) monitoring patients for evidence of recurrence of disease after previous surgical resection. Such an innovative 124I-cG250 multimodal imaging and detection strategy would be useful for accurate preoperative and intraoperative localization and confirmation of complete removal of all sites of disease during both laparoscopic and open surgical resection of ccRCC, as well as for cases with or without known/suspected regional lymph node involvement. In particular, as it pertains to laparoscopic surgical resection of patients with ccRCC, this 124I-cG250 multimodal imaging and detection strategy may allow for identification and complete surgical resection of the known primary tumor and of any sites of occult disease (ie, regional lymph node metastases) by a minimally invasive laparoscopic surgical approach, which otherwise would not be technically feasible without a specific molecular targeting approach with 124I-cG250. Likewise, as it pertains to attempted partial nephrectomy by either a laparoscopic or an open surgical resection approach for patients with early-stage ccRCC, this 124I-cG250 multimodal imaging and detection strategy may improve the success rate of complete surgical resection by assisting the urologic surgeon and the pathologist in the assessment of the kidney parenchyma surgical resection margin. Last, as it pertains to radical nephrectomy by either a laparoscopic or an open surgical resection approach for patients with more advanced but still potentially surgically resectable carcinoma (ie, with larger primary tumors and/or bulky regional lymph node involvement), this 124I-cG250 multimodal imaging and detection strategy may be of assistance to the urologic surgeon for intraoperative guidance on the exact extent of disease and for confirmation of complete surgical resection.

Conclusions

Herein, an innovative multimodal imaging and detection strategy that uses 124I-cG250 for accurate preoperative and intraoperative localization and confirmation of extent of disease for ccRCC has been described. In one case, the use of this innovative strategy during a laparoscopic approach to ccRCC was instrumental in the intraoperative identification of all diseased tissues (including a retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis), in guiding complete surgical resection, and in the confirmation of complete removal of all diseased tissues, thus allowing for successful laparoscopic resection of both the primary and the metastatic sites of disease, which otherwise would not have been technically feasible. In the other case, this innovative strategy during an open right partial nephrectomy was instrumental in guiding complete surgical resection, in the confirmation of complete removal of the tumor, and in the assessment of the kidney parenchyma surgical resection margin. This multimodal approach, which would be clinically very useful to urologic surgeons, urologic medical oncologists, nuclear medicine physicians, radiologists, and pathologists who are involved in the care of ccRCC patients, holds great potential for improving the diagnostic accuracy, operative planning and approach, verification of disease resection, and monitoring for evidence of disease recurrence in patients with ccRCC.