PURPOSE: A previous activity dose-escalation study using 131I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody cG250 in patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) resulted in occasional therapeutic responses. The present study was designed to determine the safety and therapeutic efficacy of two sequential high-dose treatments with 131I-cG250. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 29) with progressive metastatic RCC received a low dose of (131)I-cG250 for assessment of preferential targeting of metastatic lesions, followed by the first radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with 2220 MBq/m2 131I-cG250 (n = 27) 1 week later. If no grade 4 hematologic toxicity was observed, a second low-dose 131I-cG250 (n = 20) was given 3 months later. When blood clearance was not accelerated, a second RIT of 131I-cG250 was administered at an activity-dose of 1110 MBq/m2 (n = 3) or 1665 MBq/m2 (n = 16). Patients were monitored weekly for toxicity, and tumor size was evaluated by computed tomography once every 3 months intervals. RESULTS: The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of the second RIT was 1,665 MBq/m2 because of dose-limiting hematological toxicity. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, after two RIT treatments, the disease stabilized in five of 29 patients, whereas it remained progressive in 14 of 29 patients. Two patients received no RIT, and eight of 29 received only one 131I-cG250 RIT because of grade 4 hematologic toxicity, formation of human antichimeric antibodies, or disease progression. CONCLUSION: In patients with progressive end-stage RCC, the MTD of the second treatment was 75% of the MTD of the first RIT. In the majority of patients, two cycles of 131I-cG250 could be safely administered without severe toxicity. No objective responses were observed, but occasionally two RIT doses resulted in stabilization of previously progressive disease.
PURPOSE: A previous activity dose-escalation study using 131I-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody cG250 in patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) resulted in occasional therapeutic responses. The present study was designed to determine the safety and therapeutic efficacy of two sequential high-dose treatments with 131I-cG250. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 29) with progressive metastatic RCC received a low dose of (131)I-cG250 for assessment of preferential targeting of metastatic lesions, followed by the first radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with 2220 MBq/m2 131I-cG250 (n = 27) 1 week later. If no grade 4 hematologic toxicity was observed, a second low-dose 131I-cG250 (n = 20) was given 3 months later. When blood clearance was not accelerated, a second RIT of 131I-cG250 was administered at an activity-dose of 1110 MBq/m2 (n = 3) or 1665 MBq/m2 (n = 16). Patients were monitored weekly for toxicity, and tumor size was evaluated by computed tomography once every 3 months intervals. RESULTS: The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of the second RIT was 1,665 MBq/m2 because of dose-limiting hematological toxicity. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, after two RIT treatments, the disease stabilized in five of 29 patients, whereas it remained progressive in 14 of 29 patients. Two patients received no RIT, and eight of 29 received only one 131I-cG250 RIT because of grade 4 hematologic toxicity, formation of human antichimeric antibodies, or disease progression. CONCLUSION: In patients with progressive end-stage RCC, the MTD of the second treatment was 75% of the MTD of the first RIT. In the majority of patients, two cycles of 131I-cG250 could be safely administered without severe toxicity. No objective responses were observed, but occasionally two RIT doses resulted in stabilization of previously progressive disease.
Authors: Cor Hj Lamers; Stefan Sleijfer; Sabine van Steenbergen; Pascal van Elzakker; Brigitte van Krimpen; Corrien Groot; Arnold Vulto; Michael den Bakker; Egbert Oosterwijk; Reno Debets; Jan W Gratama Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Scott T Tagawa; Matthew I Milowsky; Michael Morris; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Paul Christos; Naveed H Akhtar; Joseph Osborne; Stanley J Goldsmith; Steve Larson; Neeta Pandit Taskar; Howard I Scher; Neil H Bander; David M Nanus Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Emmy D G Fleuren; Yvonne M H Versleijen-Jonkers; Sandra Heskamp; Carla M L van Herpen; Wim J G Oyen; Winette T A van der Graaf; Otto C Boerman Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Ian D Davis; Zhanqi Liu; Wayne Saunders; Fook-Thean Lee; Violeta Spirkoska; Wendie Hopkins; Fiona E Smyth; Geoffrey Chong; Anthony T Papenfuss; Bridget Chappell; Aurora Poon; Timothy H Saunder; Eric W Hoffman; Lloyd J Old; Andrew M Scott Journal: Cancer Immun Date: 2007-08-17
Authors: Ian D Davis; Gregory A Wiseman; Fook-Thean Lee; Denise N Gansen; Wendie Hopkins; Anthony T Papenfuss; Zhanqi Liu; Timothy J Moynihan; Gary A Croghan; Alex A Adjei; Eric W Hoffman; James N Ingle; Lloyd J Old; Andrew M Scott Journal: Cancer Immun Date: 2007-08-17
Authors: Alexander B Stillebroer; Gerben M Franssen; Peter F A Mulders; Wim J G Oyen; Guus A M S van Dongen; Peter Laverman; Egbert Oosterwijk; Otto C Boerman Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 3.099