BACKGROUND: Preoperative identification of tumour type could have important implications for the choice of treatment for renal cancers. Antibody cG250 reacts against carbonic anhydrase-IX, which is over-expressed in clear-cell renal carcinomas. We aimed to assess whether iodine-124-labelled antibody chimeric G250 ((124)I-cG250) PET predicts clear-cell renal carcinoma, the most common and aggressive renal tumour. METHODS: 26 patients with renal masses who were scheduled to undergo surgical resection by laparotomy received a single intravenous infusion of 185 MBq/10 mg of (124)I-cG250 over 20 min in this open-label pilot study. Surgery was scheduled 1 week after (124)I-cG250 infusion. PET and CT scanning of the abdomen, including the kidneys, within 3 h before surgery was planned for all patients. The obtained images were graded as positive (defined as a tumour-to-healthy-kidney ratio >3 to 1) or negative for antibody uptake, and the surgeon was informed of the scan results before surgery. After surgery, resected tumours were histopathologically classified as clear-cell renal carcinoma or otherwise. The trial is registered on the clinical trials site of the National Cancer Institute website http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00199888. FINDINGS: One patient received inactive antibody and was excluded from analysis. 15 of 16 clear-cell carcinomas were identified accurately by antibody PET, and all nine non-clear-cell renal masses were negative for the tracer. The sensitivity of (124)I-cG250 PET for clear-cell kidney carcinoma in this trial was 94% (95% CI 70-100%); the negative predictive value was 90% (55-100%), and specificity and positive predictive accuracy were both 100% (66-100% and 78-100%, respectively). INTERPRETATION: PET with (124)I-cG250 can identify accurately clear-cell renal carcinoma; a negative scan is highly predictive of a less aggressive phenotype. Stratification of patients with renal masses by (124)I-cG250 PET can identify aggressive tumours and help decide treatment.
BACKGROUND: Preoperative identification of tumour type could have important implications for the choice of treatment for renal cancers. Antibody cG250 reacts against carbonic anhydrase-IX, which is over-expressed in clear-cell renal carcinomas. We aimed to assess whether iodine-124-labelled antibody chimeric G250 ((124)I-cG250) PET predicts clear-cell renal carcinoma, the most common and aggressive renal tumour. METHODS: 26 patients with renal masses who were scheduled to undergo surgical resection by laparotomy received a single intravenous infusion of 185 MBq/10 mg of (124)I-cG250 over 20 min in this open-label pilot study. Surgery was scheduled 1 week after (124)I-cG250 infusion. PET and CT scanning of the abdomen, including the kidneys, within 3 h before surgery was planned for all patients. The obtained images were graded as positive (defined as a tumour-to-healthy-kidney ratio >3 to 1) or negative for antibody uptake, and the surgeon was informed of the scan results before surgery. After surgery, resected tumours were histopathologically classified as clear-cell renal carcinoma or otherwise. The trial is registered on the clinical trials site of the National Cancer Institute website http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00199888. FINDINGS: One patient received inactive antibody and was excluded from analysis. 15 of 16 clear-cell carcinomas were identified accurately by antibody PET, and all nine non-clear-cell renal masses were negative for the tracer. The sensitivity of (124)I-cG250 PET for clear-cell kidney carcinoma in this trial was 94% (95% CI 70-100%); the negative predictive value was 90% (55-100%), and specificity and positive predictive accuracy were both 100% (66-100% and 78-100%, respectively). INTERPRETATION: PET with (124)I-cG250 can identify accurately clear-cell renal carcinoma; a negative scan is highly predictive of a less aggressive phenotype. Stratification of patients with renal masses by (124)I-cG250 PET can identify aggressive tumours and help decide treatment.
Authors: Narges K Tafreshi; Mark C Lloyd; Joshua B Proemsey; Marilyn M Bui; Jongphil Kim; Robert J Gillies; David L Morse Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Joseph A O'Donoghue; Peter M Smith-Jones; John L Humm; Shutian Ruan; Daniel A Pryma; Achim A Jungbluth; Chaitanya R Divgi; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Yuman Fong; Vivian E Strong; Nancy E Kemeny; Lloyd J Old; Steven M Larson Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Stephen P Povoski; Ryan L Neff; Cathy M Mojzisik; David M O'Malley; George H Hinkle; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Ann-Marie Chacko; Chunsheng Li; Madhura Nayak; John L Mikitsh; Jia Hu; Catherine Hou; Luigi Grasso; Nicholas C Nicolaides; Vladimir R Muzykantov; Chaitanya R Divgi; George Coukos Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Chunsheng Li; Ann-Marie Chacko; Jia Hu; Kosei Hasegawa; Jennifer Swails; Luigi Grasso; Wafik S El-Deiry; Nicholas Nicolaides; Vladimir R Muzykantov; Chaitanya R Divgi; George Coukos Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: W Marston Linehan; Gennady Bratslavsky; Peter A Pinto; Laura S Schmidt; Len Neckers; Donald P Bottaro; Ramaprasad Srinivasan Journal: Annu Rev Med Date: 2010 Impact factor: 13.739