Literature DB >> 22454493

Folding without charges.

Martin Kurnik1, Linda Hedberg, Jens Danielsson, Mikael Oliveberg.   

Abstract

Surface charges of proteins have in several cases been found to function as "structural gatekeepers," which avoid unwanted interactions by negative design, for example, in the control of protein aggregation and binding. The question is then if side-chain charges, due to their desolvation penalties, play a corresponding role in protein folding by avoiding competing, misfolded traps? To find out, we removed all 32 side-chain charges from the 101-residue protein S6 from Thermus thermophilus. The results show that the charge-depleted S6 variant not only retains its native structure and cooperative folding transition, but folds also faster than the wild-type protein. In addition, charge removal unleashes pronounced aggregation on longer timescales. S6 provides thus an example where the bias toward native contacts of a naturally evolved protein sequence is independent of charges, and point at a fundamental difference in the codes for folding and intermolecular interaction: specificity in folding is governed primarily by hydrophobic packing and hydrogen bonding, whereas solubility and binding relies critically on the interplay of side-chain charges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22454493      PMCID: PMC3326513          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1118640109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  55 in total

1.  Sequence determinants of a conformational switch in a protein structure.

Authors:  Thomas A Anderson; Matthew H J Cordes; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Why are proteins charged? Networks of charge-charge interactions in proteins measured by charge ladders and capillary electrophoresis.

Authors:  Irina Gitlin; Jeffrey D Carbeck; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Electrostatic effects on funneled landscapes and structural diversity in denatured protein ensembles.

Authors:  Patrick Weinkam; Ekaterina V Pletneva; Harry B Gray; Jay R Winkler; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Tunable membrane binding of the intrinsically disordered dehydrin Lti30, a cold-induced plant stress protein.

Authors:  Sylvia K Eriksson; Michael Kutzer; Jan Procek; Gerhard Gröbner; Pia Harryson
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Factors governing the foldability of proteins.

Authors:  D K Klimov; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1996-12

Review 6.  Protein denaturation. C. Theoretical models for the mechanism of denaturation.

Authors:  C Tanford
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  1970

7.  How does a protein fold?

Authors:  A Sali; E Shakhnovich; M Karplus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-05-19       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Rapid, electrostatically assisted association of proteins.

Authors:  G Schreiber; A R Fersht
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1996-05

Review 9.  Principles of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  S Jones; J M Thornton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-associated copper/zinc superoxide dismutase mutations preferentially reduce the repulsive charge of the proteins.

Authors:  Erik Sandelin; Anna Nordlund; Peter M Andersen; Stefan S L Marklund; Mikael Oliveberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  25 in total

1.  Separating the effects of internal friction and transition state energy to explain the slow, frustrated folding of spectrin domains.

Authors:  Beth G Wensley; Lee Gyan Kwa; Sarah L Shammas; Joseph M Rogers; Stuart Browning; Ziqi Yang; Jane Clarke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Thermodynamics of protein destabilization in live cells.

Authors:  Jens Danielsson; Xin Mu; Lisa Lang; Huabing Wang; Andres Binolfi; François-Xavier Theillet; Beata Bekei; Derek T Logan; Philipp Selenko; Håkan Wennerström; Mikael Oliveberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Atomic Resolution Structure of Monomorphic Aβ42 Amyloid Fibrils.

Authors:  Michael T Colvin; Robert Silvers; Qing Zhe Ni; Thach V Can; Ivan Sergeyev; Melanie Rosay; Kevin J Donovan; Brian Michael; Joseph Wall; Sara Linse; Robert G Griffin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Modulation of folding energy landscape by charge-charge interactions: linking experiments with computational modeling.

Authors:  Franco O Tzul; Katrina L Schweiker; George I Makhatadze
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Electrostatics, structure prediction, and the energy landscapes for protein folding and binding.

Authors:  Min-Yeh Tsai; Weihua Zheng; D Balamurugan; Nicholas P Schafer; Bobby L Kim; Margaret S Cheung; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  The Role of Evolutionary Selection in the Dynamics of Protein Structure Evolution.

Authors:  Amy I Gilson; Ahmee Marshall-Christensen; Jeong-Mo Choi; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Physicochemical code for quinary protein interactions in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Xin Mu; Seongil Choi; Lisa Lang; David Mowray; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Jens Danielsson; Mikael Oliveberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Effects of protein size, thermodynamic stability, and net charge on cotranslational folding on the ribosome.

Authors:  José Arcadio Farías-Rico; Frida Ruud Selin; Ioanna Myronidi; Marie Frühauf; Gunnar von Heijne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Size and topology modulate the effects of frustration in protein folding.

Authors:  Alex Kluber; Timothy A Burt; Cecilia Clementi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Autonomous aggregation suppression by acidic residues explains why chaperones favour basic residues.

Authors:  Bert Houben; Emiel Michiels; Meine Ramakers; Katerina Konstantoulea; Nikolaos Louros; Joffré Verniers; Rob van der Kant; Matthias De Vleeschouwer; Nuno Chicória; Thomas Vanpoucke; Rodrigo Gallardo; Joost Schymkowitz; Frederic Rousseau
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.