Literature DB >> 32237079

Autonomous aggregation suppression by acidic residues explains why chaperones favour basic residues.

Bert Houben1,2, Emiel Michiels1,2, Meine Ramakers1,2, Katerina Konstantoulea1,2, Nikolaos Louros1,2, Joffré Verniers1,2, Rob van der Kant1,2, Matthias De Vleeschouwer1,2, Nuno Chicória1,2, Thomas Vanpoucke1,2, Rodrigo Gallardo1,2, Joost Schymkowitz1,2, Frederic Rousseau1,2.   

Abstract

Many chaperones favour binding to hydrophobic sequences that are flanked by basic residues while disfavouring acidic residues. However, the origin of this bias in protein quality control remains poorly understood. Here, we show that while acidic residues are the most efficient aggregation inhibitors, they are also less compatible with globular protein structure than basic amino acids. As a result, while acidic residues allow for chaperone-independent control of aggregation, their use is structurally limited. Conversely, we find that, while being more compatible with globular structure, basic residues are not sufficient to autonomously suppress protein aggregation. Using Hsp70, we show that chaperones with a bias towards basic residues are structurally adapted to prioritize aggregating sequences whose structural context forced the use of the less effective basic residues. The hypothesis that emerges from our analysis is that the bias of many chaperones for basic residues results from fundamental thermodynamic and kinetic constraints of globular structure. This also suggests the co-evolution of basic residues and chaperones allowed for an expansion of structural variety in the protein universe.
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hsp70; aggregation; gatekeepers; protein folding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32237079      PMCID: PMC7265246          DOI: 10.15252/embj.2019102864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  60 in total

1.  A comparative study of the relationship between protein structure and beta-aggregation in globular and intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Rune Linding; Joost Schymkowitz; Frederic Rousseau; Francesca Diella; Luis Serrano
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  The Zyggregator method for predicting protein aggregation propensities.

Authors:  Gian Gaetano Tartaglia; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  A genome-wide sequence-structure analysis suggests aggregation gatekeepers constitute an evolutionary constrained functional class.

Authors:  Greet De Baets; Joost Van Durme; Frederic Rousseau; Joost Schymkowitz
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Empirical scale of side-chain conformational entropy in protein folding.

Authors:  S D Pickett; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-06-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Proteome-wide subcellular topologies of E. coli polypeptides database (STEPdb).

Authors:  Georgia Orfanoudaki; Anastassios Economou
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  Protein sequences encode safeguards against aggregation.

Authors:  Joke Reumers; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Joost Schymkowitz; Fréderic Rousseau
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase.

Authors:  The UniProt Consortium
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Aggregation propensity of the human proteome.

Authors:  Elodie Monsellier; Matteo Ramazzotti; Niccolò Taddei; Fabrizio Chiti
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Aggregation gatekeeper and controlled assembly of Trpzip β-hairpins.

Authors:  Beatrice N Markiewicz; Rolando Oyola; Deguo Du; Feng Gai
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  The importance of a gatekeeper residue on the aggregation of transthyretin: implications for transthyretin-related amyloidoses.

Authors:  Ricardo Sant'Anna; Carolina Braga; Nathalia Varejão; Karinne M Pimenta; Ricardo Graña-Montes; Aline Alves; Juliana Cortines; Yraima Cordeiro; Salvador Ventura; Debora Foguel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  10 in total

1.  Autonomous aggregation suppression by acidic residues explains why chaperones favour basic residues.

Authors:  Bert Houben; Emiel Michiels; Meine Ramakers; Katerina Konstantoulea; Nikolaos Louros; Joffré Verniers; Rob van der Kant; Matthias De Vleeschouwer; Nuno Chicória; Thomas Vanpoucke; Rodrigo Gallardo; Joost Schymkowitz; Frederic Rousseau
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Behind closed gates - chaperones and charged residues determine protein fate.

Authors:  Margreet B Koopman; Stefan Gd Rüdiger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  A3D 2.0 Update for the Prediction and Optimization of Protein Solubility.

Authors:  Jordi Pujols; Valentín Iglesias; Jaime Santos; Aleksander Kuriata; Sebastian Kmiecik; Salvador Ventura
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Modern and prebiotic amino acids support distinct structural profiles in proteins.

Authors:  Vyacheslav Tretyachenko; Jiří Vymětal; Tereza Neuwirthová; Jiří Vondrášek; Kosuke Fujishima; Klára Hlouchová
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  The functions and regulation of heat shock proteins; key orchestrators of proteostasis and the heat shock response.

Authors:  Benjamin J Lang; Martin E Guerrero; Thomas L Prince; Yuka Okusha; Cristina Bonorino; Stuart K Calderwood
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  The cellular modifier MOAG-4/SERF drives amyloid formation through charge complementation.

Authors:  Anita Pras; Bert Houben; Francesco A Aprile; Renée Seinstra; Rodrigo Gallardo; Leen Janssen; Wytse Hogewerf; Christian Gallrein; Matthias De Vleeschouwer; Alejandro Mata-Cabana; Mandy Koopman; Esther Stroo; Minke de Vries; Samantha Louise Edwards; Janine Kirstein; Michele Vendruscolo; Salvatore Fabio Falsone; Frederic Rousseau; Joost Schymkowitz; Ellen A A Nollen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Mapping the sequence specificity of heterotypic amyloid interactions enables the identification of aggregation modifiers.

Authors:  Nikolaos Louros; Meine Ramakers; Emiel Michiels; Katerina Konstantoulea; Chiara Morelli; Teresa Garcia; Nele Moonen; Sam D'Haeyer; Vera Goossens; Dietmar Rudolf Thal; Dominique Audenaert; Frederic Rousseau; Joost Schymkowitz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  The effect of mutation on an aggregation-prone protein: An in vivo, in vitro, and in silico analysis.

Authors:  N Guthertz; R van der Kant; R M Martinez; Y Xu; C Trinh; B I Iorga; F Rousseau; J Schymkowitz; D J Brockwell; S E Radford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Single residue modulators of amyloid formation in the N-terminal P1-region of α-synuclein.

Authors:  Sabine M Ulamec; Roberto Maya-Martinez; Emily J Byrd; Katherine M Dewison; Yong Xu; Leon F Willis; Frank Sobott; George R Heath; Patricija van Oosten Hawle; Vladimir L Buchman; Sheena E Radford; David J Brockwell
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 10.  Co-Chaperones in Targeting and Delivery of Misfolded Proteins to the 26S Proteasome.

Authors:  Amanda B Abildgaard; Sarah K Gersing; Sven Larsen-Ledet; Sofie V Nielsen; Amelie Stein; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Rasmus Hartmann-Petersen
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-08-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.