Literature DB >> 7497841

Management of early invasive colorectal cancer. Risk of recurrence and clinical guidelines.

R Kikuchi1, M Takano, K Takagi, N Fujimoto, R Nozaki, T Fujiyoshi, Y Uchida.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was the evaluation of various factors in the formulation of guidelines for treatment of early invasive colorectal cancer, in which malignant cells extend through the muscularis mucosa into the submucosa but do not deeply invade the muscularis propria.
METHOD: A total of 182 patients were followed for at least five years or until death, with early invasive cancer diagnosed between 1982 and 1989. Patients were grouped according to the level of invasion, as follows: 64 patients with slight carcinoma invasion of the muscularis mucosa (200-300 microns; sm1), 82 with intermediate invasion (sm2), and 36 with carcinoma invasion extending to the inner surface of the muscularis propria (sm3). RESULT: The configuration, diameter, and histologic grade of adenocarcinoma and lymphovascular invasion were correlated with level of invasion. After endoscopic polypectomy or local resection, 4 patients showed local recurrence and 13 patients showed lymph node metastasis. None of these 17 patients had sm1 disease. The level of invasion, configuration, and location were significant risk factors for development of lymph node metastasis or local recurrence (P < 0.05), but lymphovascular invasion, histologic grade, and diameter were not risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative assessment of the level of invasion using this classification, in which the submucosa is divided into three depths, may decrease the incidence of unnecessary surgery for sessile polyps. Assessment according to the level of invasion is useful in the formulation of appropriate guidelines for the treatment of early invasive cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7497841     DOI: 10.1007/bf02049154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  131 in total

1.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps in typical UK hospitals.

Authors:  Teegan R Lim; Venkat Mahesh; Salil Singh; Benjamin H L Tan; Mohamed Elsadig; Nerukav Radhakrishnan; Phil Conlong; Chris Babbs; Regi George
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Long-term outcomes after treatment for T1 colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Naoki Asayama; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Yuki Ninomiya; Yuzuru Tamaru; Kenjiro Shigita; Nana Hayashi; Hiroyuki Egi; Takao Hinoi; Hideki Ohdan; Koji Arihiro; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Pathological predictors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hitoshi Yamauchi; Kazutomo Togashi; Yutaka J Kawamura; Hisanaga Horie; Junichi Sasaki; Shingo Tsujinaka; Yoshikazu Yasuda; Fumio Konishi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Local Excision and Endoscopic Resections for Early Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Guilherme Pagin São Julião; Juan Pablo Celentano; Flavia Andrea Alexandre; Bruna Borba Vailati
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

5.  Poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs) as a novel histological predictor of nodal metastases in pT1 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Valeria Barresi; Giovanni Branca; Antonio Ieni; Luca Reggiani Bonetti; Luigi Baron; Stefania Mondello; Giovanni Tuccari
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Colorectal carcinoma grading by quantifying poorly differentiated cell clusters is more reproducible and provides more robust prognostic information than conventional grading.

Authors:  Valeria Barresi; Luca Reggiani Bonetti; Giovanni Branca; Carmela Di Gregorio; Maurizio Ponz de Leon; Giovanni Tuccari
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Interobserver variability amongst gastrointestinal pathologists in assessing prognostic parameters of malignant colorectal polyps: a cause for concern.

Authors:  A Davenport; J Morris; S A Pritchard; E Salmo; M Scott; N Y Haboubi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Local management of rectal neoplasia.

Authors:  John Touzios; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

9.  The pathologist's role in rectal cancer patient assessments.

Authors:  Joseph E Willis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

10.  Long-term outcomes after treatment for pedunculated-type T1 colorectal carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Naoki Asayama; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Shinji Nagata; Akira Furudoi; Toshio Kuwai; Seiji Onogawa; Tadamasa Tamura; Hiroyuki Kanao; Yuko Hiraga; Hideharu Okanobu; Takayasu Kuwabara; Masaki Kunihiro; Shinichi Mukai; Eizo Goto; Fumio Shimamoto; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.