Literature DB >> 28856400

Time Series Analysis of Energy Production and Associated Landscape Fragmentation in the Eagle Ford Shale Play.

Jon Paul Pierre1, Michael H Young2, Brad D Wolaver2, John R Andrews2, Caroline L Breton2.   

Abstract

Spatio-temporal trends in infrastructure footprints, energy production, and landscape alteration were assessed for the Eagle Ford Shale of Texas. The period of analysis was over four 2-year periods (2006-2014). Analyses used high-resolution imagery, as well as pipeline data to map EF infrastructure. Landscape conditions from 2006 were used as baseline. Results indicate that infrastructure footprints varied from 94.5 km2 in 2008 to 225.0 km2 in 2014. By 2014, decreased land-use intensities (ratio of land alteration to energy production) were noted play-wide. Core-area alteration by period was highest (3331.6 km2) in 2008 at the onset of play development, and increased from 582.3 to 3913.9 km2 by 2014, though substantial revegetation of localized core areas was observed throughout the study (i.e., alteration improved in some areas and worsened in others). Land-use intensity in the eastern portion of the play was consistently lower than that in the western portion, while core alteration remained relatively constant east to west. Land alteration from pipeline construction was ~65 km2 for all time periods, except in 2010 when alteration was recorded at 47 km2. Percent of total alteration from well-pad construction increased from 27.3% in 2008 to 71.5% in 2014. The average number of wells per pad across all 27 counties increased from 1.15 to 1.7. This study presents a framework for mapping landscape alteration from oil and gas infrastructure development. However, the framework could be applied to other energy development programs, such as wind or solar fields, or any other regional infrastructure development program. Landscape alteration caused by hydrocarbon pipeline installation in Val Verde County, Texas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eagle Ford; Ecosystems; Fragmentation; Infrastructure; Landscape impacts

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28856400     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0925-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  15 in total

1.  Early trends in landcover change and forest fragmentation due to shale-gas development in Pennsylvania: a potential outcome for the Northcentral Appalachians.

Authors:  P J Drohan; M Brittingham; J Bishop; K Yoder
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Synergies and Tradeoffs Among Environmental Impacts Under Conservation Planning of Shale Gas Surface Infrastructure.

Authors:  Austin W Milt; Tamara Gagnolet; Paul R Armsworth
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared.

Authors:  Ben Phalan; Malvika Onial; Andrew Balmford; Rhys E Green
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Impacts from above-ground activities in the eagle ford shale play on landscapes and hydrologic flows, La Salle County, Texas.

Authors:  Jon Paul Pierre; Charles J Abolt; Michael H Young
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Sustainability. Ecosystem services lost to oil and gas in North America.

Authors:  Brady W Allred; W Kolby Smith; Dirac Twidwell; Julia H Haggerty; Steven W Running; David E Naugle; Samuel D Fuhlendorf
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses.

Authors:  Jeffrey Sayer; Terry Sunderland; Jaboury Ghazoul; Jean-Laurent Pfund; Douglas Sheil; Erik Meijaard; Michelle Venter; Agni Klintuni Boedhihartono; Michael Day; Claude Garcia; Cora van Oosten; Louise E Buck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The costs of avoiding environmental impacts from shale-gas surface infrastructure.

Authors:  Austin W Milt; Tamara D Gagnolet; Paul R Armsworth
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Presence and abundance of non-native plant species associated with recent energy development in the Williston Basin.

Authors:  Todd M Preston
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Mapping oil and gas development potential in the US Intermountain West and estimating impacts to species.

Authors:  Holly E Copeland; Kevin E Doherty; David E Naugle; Amy Pocewicz; Joseph M Kiesecker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Energy sprawl or energy efficiency: climate policy impacts on natural habitat for the United States of America.

Authors:  Robert I McDonald; Joseph Fargione; Joe Kiesecker; William M Miller; Jimmie Powell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Recent Oil and Gas, Wind Energy, and Other Anthropogenic Landscape Alteration Factors in Texas Through 2014.

Authors:  Jon Paul Pierre; Brad D Wolaver; Benjamin J Labay; Travis J LaDuc; Charles M Duran; Wade A Ryberg; Toby J Hibbitts; John R Andrews
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  An Improved Approach for Forecasting Ecological Impacts from Future Drilling in Unconventional Shale Oil and Gas Plays.

Authors:  Brad D Wolaver; Jon Paul Pierre; Svetlana A Ikonnikova; John R Andrews; Guinevere McDaid; Wade A Ryberg; Toby J Hibbitts; Charles M Duran; Benjamin J Labay; Travis J LaDuc
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.266

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.