Literature DB >> 27743207

Fracked ecology: Response of aquatic trophic structure and mercury biomagnification dynamics in the Marcellus Shale Formation.

Christopher James Grant1, Allison K Lutz2, Aaron D Kulig3, Mitchell R Stanton4.   

Abstract

Unconventional natural gas development and hydraulic fracturing practices (fracking) are increasing worldwide due to global energy demands. Research has only recently begun to assess fracking impacts to surrounding environments, and very little research is aimed at determining effects on aquatic biodiversity and contaminant biomagnification. Twenty-seven remotely-located streams in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale basin were sampled during June and July of 2012 and 2013. At each stream, stream physiochemical properties, trophic biodiversity, and structure and mercury levels were assessed. We used δ15N, δ13C, and methyl mercury to determine whether changes in methyl mercury biomagnification were related to the fracking occurring within the streams' watersheds. While we observed no difference in rates of biomagnificaion related to within-watershed fracking activities, we did observe elevated methyl mercury concentrations that were influenced by decreased stream pH, elevated dissolved stream water Hg values, decreased macroinvertebrate Index for Biotic Integrity scores, and lower Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera macroinvertebrate richness at stream sites where fracking had occurred within their watershed. We documented the loss of scrapers from streams with the highest well densities, and no fish or no fish diversity at streams with documented frackwater fluid spills. Our results suggest fracking has the potential to alter aquatic biodiversity and methyl mercury concentrations at the base of food webs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic ecology; Biodiversity; Biomagnification; Hydraulic fracturing; Marcellus shale; Stable isotopes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27743207     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-016-1717-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  14 in total

Review 1.  Bioaccumulation syndrome: identifying factors that make some stream food webs prone to elevated mercury bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Darren M Ward; Keith H Nislow; Carol L Folt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Early trends in landcover change and forest fragmentation due to shale-gas development in Pennsylvania: a potential outcome for the Northcentral Appalachians.

Authors:  P J Drohan; M Brittingham; J Bishop; K Yoder
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Habitat-specific bioaccumulation of methylmercury in invertebrates of small mid-latitude lakes in North America.

Authors:  John Chételat; Marc Amyot; Edenise Garcia
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Aquatic and terrestrial organic matter in the diet of stream consumers: implications for mercury bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Timothy D Jardine; Karen A Kidd; Joseph B Rasmussen
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Basal mercury concentrations and biomagnification rates in freshwater and marine food webs: effects on Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) from eastern Canada.

Authors:  S van der Velden; J B Dempson; M S Evans; D C G Muir; M Power
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Marcellus and mercury: Assessing potential impacts of unconventional natural gas extraction on aquatic ecosystems in northwestern Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Christopher J Grant; Alexander B Weimer; Nicole K Marks; Elliott S Perow; Jacob M Oster; Kristen M Brubaker; Ryan V Trexler; Caroline M Solomon; Regina Lamendella
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.269

7.  Food web analysis reveals effects of pH on mercury bioaccumulation at multiple trophic levels in streams.

Authors:  Timothy D Jardine; Karen A Kidd; Nelson O' Driscoll
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Effect of pH on mercury uptake by an aquatic bacterium: implications for Hg cycling.

Authors:  C A Kelly; John W M Rudd; M H Holoka
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Mercury cycling in stream ecosystems. 3. Trophic dynamics and methylmercury bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Lia C Chasar; Barbara C Scudder; A Robin Stewart; Amanda H Bell; George R Aiken
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Application of nitrogen and carbon stable isotopes (δ(15)N and δ(13)C) to quantify food chain length and trophic structure.

Authors:  Matthew J Perkins; Robbie A McDonald; F J Frank van Veen; Simon D Kelly; Gareth Rees; Stuart Bearhop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Surface Water Microbial Community Response to the Biocide 2,2-Dibromo-3-Nitrilopropionamide, Used in Unconventional Oil and Gas Extraction.

Authors:  Maria Fernanda Campa; Stephen M Techtmann; Mallory P Ladd; Jun Yan; Megan Patterson; Amanda Garcia de Matos Amaral; Kimberly E Carter; Nikea Ulrich; Christopher J Grant; Robert L Hettich; Regina Lamendella; Terry C Hazen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Response of Aquatic Bacterial Communities to Hydraulic Fracturing in Northwestern Pennsylvania: A Five-Year Study.

Authors:  Nikea Ulrich; Veronica Kirchner; Rebecca Drucker; Justin R Wright; Christopher J McLimans; Terry C Hazen; Maria F Campa; Christopher J Grant; Regina Lamendella
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Demographic characteristics of an avian predator, Louisiana Waterthrush (Parkesia motacilla), in response to its aquatic prey in a Central Appalachian USA watershed impacted by shale gas development.

Authors:  Mack W Frantz; Petra B Wood; George T Merovich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.