Literature DB >> 31214918

Objective and quantitative assessment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity based on steady-state motion visual evoked potentials using concentric-ring paradigm.

Xiaowei Zheng1, Guanghua Xu2,3, Yunyun Wang4, Chengcheng Han1, Chenghang Du1, Wenqaing Yan1, Sicong Zhang1, Renghao Liang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The traditional assessment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity depends more on subjective judgments. Steady-state motion visual evoked potentials (SSMVEPs) can provide an objective and quantitative method to evaluate visual functions such as visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Here, we explored the possibility of objective SSMVEP visual acuity and contrast sensitivity testing, and compared its performance with that of psychophysical methods.
METHODS: In this study, we designed a specific concentric ring with oscillating expansion and contraction SSMVEP paradigm to assess visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. By changing the parameters of the paradigm, the SSMVEP paradigm with different contrasts and spatial frequencies corresponding to different visual acuity and contrast sensitivity was designed. Moreover, we proposed a threshold determination criterion to define the corresponding objective SSMVEP visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.
RESULTS: We tested visual acuity and contrast sensitivity of sixteen healthy adults utilizing this paradigm with an electroencephalography system. Our data suggested that there was no significant difference between objective visual acuity and contrast sensitivity measurements based on the SSMVEPs and subjective psychophysical ones.
CONCLUSION: Our study proved that SSMVEPs can be an objective and quantitative method to measure visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.

Keywords:  Contrast sensitivity; Steady-state motion visual evoked potential (SSMVEP); Threshold determination; Visual acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31214918     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-019-09702-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  23 in total

1.  Contrast-response functions of the multifocal steady-state VEP (MSV).

Authors:  S N Abdullah; M Y Boon; T Maddess
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Comparison of the VCTS-6500 and the CSV-1000 tests for visual contrast sensitivity testing.

Authors:  Sandra Franco; Ana Carolina Silva; Ana Sofia Carvalho; Ana Sofia Macedo; Madalena Lira
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.294

3.  A new binocular approach to the treatment of amblyopia in adults well beyond the critical period of visual development.

Authors:  R F Hess; B Mansouri; B Thompson
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  A comparison of the performance of three visual evoked potential-based methods to estimate visual acuity.

Authors:  Anne Kurtenbach; Hana Langrová; Andre Messias; Eberhart Zrenner; Herbert Jägle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Four Novel Motion Paradigms Based on Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential.

Authors:  Wenqiang Yan; Guanghua Xu; Jun Xie; Min Li; Ziyan Dan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Rapid Objective Assessment of Contrast Sensitivity and Visual Acuity With Sweep Visual Evoked Potentials and an Extended Electrode Array.

Authors:  Coralie Hemptinne; Joan Liu-Shuang; Demet Yuksel; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Effects of sweep VEP parameters on visual acuity and contrast thresholds in children and adults.

Authors:  Fahad M Almoqbel; Naveen K Yadav; Susan J Leat; Liseann M Head; Elizabeth L Irving
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Steady-state motion visual evoked potentials produced by oscillating Newton's rings: implications for brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Jun Xie; Guanghua Xu; Jing Wang; Feng Zhang; Yizhuo Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Highly Interactive Brain-Computer Interface Based on Flicker-Free Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential.

Authors:  Chengcheng Han; Guanghua Xu; Jun Xie; Chaoyang Chen; Sicong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  Anti-fatigue Performance in SSVEP-Based Visual Acuity Assessment: A Comparison of Six Stimulus Paradigms.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Yubin Zhang; Renghao Liang; Kai Zhang; Yuhui Du; Jun Xie; Sicong Zhang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Does Oblique Effect Affect SSVEP-Based Visual Acuity Assessment?

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Yuhui Du; Hui Li; Chengcheng Han; Peiyuan Tian; Zejin Li; Chenghang Du; Wenqiang Yan; Sicong Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 3.  Assessment of Human Visual Acuity Using Visual Evoked Potential: A Review.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Kai Zhang; Renghao Liang; Wenqiang Yan; Peiyuan Tian; Yaguang Jia; Sicong Zhang; Chenghang Du
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Assessing the Effect of the Refresh Rate of a Device on Various Motion Stimulation Frequencies Based on Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Chengcheng Han; Guanghua Xu; Xiaowei Zheng; Peiyuan Tian; Kai Zhang; Wenqiang Yan; Yaguang Jia; Xiaobi Chen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.