Literature DB >> 22445135

Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities.

Vera Moliadze1, Deniz Atalay, Andrea Antal, Walter Paulus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently we have shown that transcranial random noise (tRNS) and 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulations (tACS), applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and using 10 min stimulation duration and 1 mA intensity, significantly increases cortical excitability as measured by motor evoked potentials at rest before and after stimulation. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Here, by decreasing the stimulation intensity in 0.2 mA steps from 1.0 mA, we investigate to what extent intensity depends on the induced after-effects.
METHODS: All twenty-five subjects participated in two different experimental sessions each. They received tACS using 140 Hz frequency and full spectrum tRNS at five different intensities on separate days. Sham stimulation was used as a control.
RESULTS: Instead of receiving a simple threshold, unexpectedly, in these two independent data sets at threshold intensities of 0.4 mA we found a switch of the already known excitation achieved with an intensity of 1 mA to inhibition. The intermediate intensity ranges of 0.6 and 0.8 mA had no effect at all. Interestingly, the inhibition produced by 140 Hz tACS was stronger than that induced by tRNS.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we have shown here the possibility of selectively controlling the enhancement or reduction of M1 excitability by applying different intensities of high frequency transcranial electrical stimulation.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22445135     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  76 in total

Review 1.  [Transcranial alternating current stimulation. Entrainment and function control of neuronal networks].

Authors:  J Vosskuhl; D Strüber; C S Herrmann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Paired associative transcranial alternating current stimulation increases the excitability of corticospinal projections in humans.

Authors:  Emmet McNickle; Richard G Carson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Asif Jamil; Giorgi Batsikadze; Hsiao-I Kuo; Ludovica Labruna; Alkomiet Hasan; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Impact of different intensities of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the cortical properties during TMS-EEG and working memory performance.

Authors:  Sung Wook Chung; Nigel C Rogasch; Kate E Hoy; Caley M Sullivan; Robin F H Cash; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  A New, High-Efficacy, Noninvasive Transcranial Electric Stimulation Tuned to Local Neurodynamics.

Authors:  Carlo Cottone; Andrea Cancelli; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Camillo Porcaro; Carlo Salustri; Franca Tecchio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes.

Authors:  Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Paola Marangolo; Benjamin M Hampstead; Sven Bestmann; Elisabeth Galletta; Helena Knotkova; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Sensorimotor Rhythm BCI with Simultaneous High Definition-Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Alters Task Performance.

Authors:  Bryan S Baxter; Bradley J Edelman; Nicholas Nesbitt; Bin He
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.

Authors:  G Batsikadze; V Moliadze; W Paulus; M-F Kuo; M A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.