Literature DB >> 29124791

Impact of different intensities of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the cortical properties during TMS-EEG and working memory performance.

Sung Wook Chung1, Nigel C Rogasch2, Kate E Hoy1, Caley M Sullivan1, Robin F H Cash1, Paul B Fitzgerald1,3.   

Abstract

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique capable of increasing cortical excitability beyond the stimulation period. Due to the rapid induction of modulatory effects, prefrontal application of iTBS is gaining popularity as a therapeutic tool for psychiatric disorders such as depression. In an attempt to increase efficacy, higher than conventional intensities are currently being applied. The assumption that this increases neuromodulatory may be mechanistically false for iTBS. This study examined the influence of intensity on the neurophysiological and behavioural effects of iTBS in the prefrontal cortex. Sixteen healthy participants received iTBS over prefrontal cortex at either 50, 75 or 100% resting motor threshold in separate sessions. Single-pulse TMS and concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) was used to assess changes in cortical reactivity measured as TMS-evoked potentials and oscillations. The n-back task was used to assess changes in working memory performance. The data can be summarised as an inverse U-shape relationship between intensity and iTBS plastic effects, where 75% iTBS yielded the largest neurophysiological changes. Improvement in reaction time in the 3-back task was supported by the change in alpha power, however, comparison between conditions revealed no significant differences. The assumption that higher intensity results in greater neuromodulatory effects may be false, at least in healthy individuals, and should be carefully considered for clinical populations. Neurophysiological changes associated with working memory following iTBS suggest functional relevance. However, the effects of different intensities on behavioural performance remain elusive in the present healthy sample.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMS-EEG; intensity; prefrontal cortex; theta burst stimulation (TBS); working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29124791      PMCID: PMC6866298          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  136 in total

1.  Inhibitory and disinhibitory effects on I-wave facilitation in motor cortex.

Authors:  R F H Cash; U Ziemann; G W Thickbroom
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Motor control in simple bimanual movements: a transcranial magnetic stimulation and reaction time study.

Authors:  H Foltys; R Sparing; B Boroojerdi; T Krings; I G Meister; F M Mottaghy; R Töpper
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Zaira Cattaneo; Lorella Battelli; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Prior intention can locally tune inhibitory processes in the primary motor cortex: direct evidence from combined TMS-EEG.

Authors:  M Bonnard; L Spieser; H B Meziane; J B de Graaf; J Pailhous
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Modulation of motor cortex neuronal networks by rTMS: comparison of local and remote effects of six different protocols of stimulation.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; M Dileone; F Pilato; F Capone; G Musumeci; F Ranieri; V Ricci; P Bria; R Di Iorio; C de Waure; P Pasqualetti; P Profice
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Alpha oscillations serve to protect working memory maintenance against anticipated distracters.

Authors:  Mathilde Bonnefond; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  Working memory improvement with non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  André Russowsky Brunoni; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Reduced Short-Latency Afferent Inhibition in Prefrontal but not Motor Cortex and Its Association With Executive Function in Schizophrenia: A Combined TMS-EEG Study.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Noda; Mera S Barr; Reza Zomorrodi; Robin F H Cash; Tarek K Rajji; Faranak Farzan; Robert Chen; Tony P George; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Daniel M Blumberger
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 9.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10.

Authors:  D V Sheehan; Y Lecrubier; K H Sheehan; P Amorim; J Janavs; E Weiller; T Hergueta; R Baker; G C Dunbar
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.384

10.  Modulation of the Direction and Magnitude of Hebbian Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex by Stimulus Intensity and Concurrent Inhibition.

Authors:  R F H Cash; G Jegatheeswaran; Z Ni; R Chen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 8.955

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Critical role of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission in the central mechanisms of theta-burst stimulation.

Authors:  Cheng-Ta Li; Ying-Zu Huang; Ya-Mei Bai; Shih-Jen Tsai; Tung-Ping Su; Chih-Ming Cheng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Impact of different intensities of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the cortical properties during TMS-EEG and working memory performance.

Authors:  Sung Wook Chung; Nigel C Rogasch; Kate E Hoy; Caley M Sullivan; Robin F H Cash; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Factors affecting the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jintao Wang; Lei Huang; Lili Wei; Wei Chen
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-06-25

Review 4.  The Effect of Cerebellar rTMS on Modulating Motor Dysfunction in Neurological Disorders: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yifei Xia; Mingqi Wang; Yulian Zhu
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.648

Review 5.  The Problem and Potential of TMS' Infinite Parameter Space: A Targeted Review and Road Map Forward.

Authors:  Kevin A Caulfield; Joshua C Brown
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 5.435

6.  The effects of individualised intermittent theta burst stimulation in the prefrontal cortex: A TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Sung Wook Chung; Caley M Sullivan; Nigel C Rogasch; Kate E Hoy; Neil W Bailey; Robin F H Cash; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Pinging the brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals cortical reactivity in time and space.

Authors:  Sangtae Ahn; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Neurophysiological markers of response to theta burst stimulation in youth depression.

Authors:  Prabhjot Dhami; Sravya Atluri; Jonathan Lee; Yuliya Knyahnytska; Paul E Croarkin; Daniel M Blumberger; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Faranak Farzan
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 6.505

9.  A reexamination of motor and prefrontal TMS in tobacco use disorder: Time for personalized dosing based on electric field modeling?

Authors:  Kevin A Caulfield; Xingbao Li; Mark S George
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 4.861

10.  Continuous theta-burst stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex inhibits improvement on a working memory task.

Authors:  Teodóra Vékony; Viola Luca Németh; Adrienn Holczer; Krisztián Kocsis; Zsigmond Tamás Kincses; László Vécsei; Anita Must
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.