Literature DB >> 23339180

Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.

G Batsikadze1, V Moliadze, W Paulus, M-F Kuo, M A Nitsche.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the human motor cortex at an intensity of 1 mA with an electrode size of 35 cm(2) has been shown to induce shifts of cortical excitability during and after stimulation. These shifts are polarity-specific with cathodal tDCS resulting in a decrease and anodal stimulation in an increase of cortical excitability. In clinical and cognitive studies, stronger stimulation intensities are used frequently, but their physiological effects on cortical excitability have not yet been explored. Therefore, here we aimed to explore the effects of 2 mA tDCS on cortical excitability. We applied 2 mA anodal or cathodal tDCS for 20 min on the left primary motor cortex of 14 healthy subjects. Cathodal tDCS at 1 mA and sham tDCS for 20 min was administered as control session in nine and eight healthy subjects, respectively. Motor cortical excitability was monitored by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle. Global corticospinal excitability was explored via single TMS pulse-elicited MEP amplitudes, and motor thresholds. Intracortical effects of stimulation were obtained by cortical silent period (CSP), short latency intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (ICF), and I wave facilitation. The above-mentioned protocols were recorded both before and immediately after tDCS in randomized order. Additionally, single-pulse MEPs, motor thresholds, SICI and ICF were recorded every 30 min up to 2 h after stimulation end, evening of the same day, next morning, next noon and next evening. Anodal as well as cathodal tDCS at 2 mA resulted in a significant increase of MEP amplitudes, whereas 1 mA cathodal tDCS decreased corticospinal excitability. A significant shift of SICI and ICF towards excitability enhancement after both 2 mA cathodal and anodal tDCS was observed. At 1 mA, cathodal tDCS reduced single-pulse TMS-elicited MEP amplitudes and shifted SICI and ICF towards inhibition. No significant changes were observed in the other protocols. Sham tDCS did not induce significant MEP alterations. These results suggest that an enhancement of tDCS intensity does not necessarily increase efficacy of stimulation, but might also shift the direction of excitability alterations. This should be taken into account for applications of the stimulation technique using different intensities and durations in order to achieve stronger or longer lasting after-effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23339180      PMCID: PMC3624864          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  55 in total

1.  An experimental test of the role of postsynaptic calcium levels in determining synaptic strength using perirhinal cortex of rat.

Authors:  K Cho; J P Aggleton; M W Brown; Z I Bashir
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Three Ca2+ levels affect plasticity differently: the LTP zone, the LTD zone and no man's land.

Authors:  J E Lisman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  K Stefan; E Kunesch; L G Cohen; R Benecke; J Classen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Maren S Nitsche; Cornelia C Klein; Frithjof Tergau; John C Rothwell; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  Clinical and research methods for evaluating cortical excitability.

Authors:  Giovanni Abbruzzese; Carlo Trompetto
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.177

7.  Spinal motor neuron excitability during the silent period after cortical stimulation.

Authors:  P Fuhr; R Agostino; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-08

8.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Effects of applied electric fields on low-calcium epileptiform activity in the CA1 region of rat hippocampal slices.

Authors:  R S Ghai; M Bikson; D M Durand
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  David Liebetanz; Michael A Nitsche; Frithjof Tergau; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  285 in total

Review 1.  Successful aging: Advancing the science of physical independence in older adults.

Authors:  Stephen D Anton; Adam J Woods; Tetso Ashizawa; Diana Barb; Thomas W Buford; Christy S Carter; David J Clark; Ronald A Cohen; Duane B Corbett; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Vonetta Dotson; Natalie Ebner; Philip A Efron; Roger B Fillingim; Thomas C Foster; David M Gundermann; Anna-Maria Joseph; Christy Karabetian; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Todd M Manini; Michael Marsiske; Robert T Mankowski; Heather L Mutchie; Michael G Perri; Sanjay Ranka; Parisa Rashidi; Bhanuprasad Sandesara; Philip J Scarpace; Kimberly T Sibille; Laurence M Solberg; Shinichi Someya; Connie Uphold; Stephanie Wohlgemuth; Samuel Shangwu Wu; Marco Pahor
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 10.895

2.  Functional activation independently contributes to naming ability and relates to lesion site in post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  Laura M Skipper-Kallal; Elizabeth H Lacey; Shihui Xing; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Augmenting cognitive training in older adults (The ACT Study): Design and Methods of a Phase III tDCS and cognitive training trial.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Ronald Cohen; Michael Marsiske; Gene E Alexander; Sara J Czaja; Samuel Wu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  The world can look better: enhancing beauty experience with brain stimulation.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Carlotta Lega; Albert Flexas; Marcos Nadal; Enric Munar; Camilo J Cela-Conde
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of frontal cortex decreases performance on the WAIS-IV intelligence test.

Authors:  Kristin K Sellers; Juliann M Mellin; Caroline M Lustenberger; Michael R Boyle; Won Hee Lee; Angel V Peterchev; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Transcranial direct current brain stimulation decreases impulsivity in ADHD.

Authors:  Cheyenne Allenby; Mary Falcone; Leah Bernardo; E Paul Wileyto; Anthony Rostain; J Russell Ramsay; Caryn Lerman; James Loughead
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Assessing the effects of tDCS over a delayed response inhibition task by targeting the right inferior frontal gyrus and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Davide Francesco Stramaccia; Barbara Penolazzi; Giulia Sartori; Miriam Braga; Sara Mondini; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation enhances effector-independent representations of motor synergy and sequence learning.

Authors:  Sheena Waters-Metenier; Masud Husain; Tobias Wiestler; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Ludovica Labruna; Asif Jamil; Shane Fresnoza; Giorgi Batsikadze; Min-Fang Kuo; Benjamin Vanderschelden; Richard B Ivry; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 10.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.