Literature DB >> 22442134

Quantifying long-term microelectrode array functionality using chronic in vivo impedance testing.

Abhishek Prasad1, Justin C Sanchez.   

Abstract

Long-term acquisition of high-quality neural recordings is a cornerstone of neuroprosthetic system design. Mitigating the experimental variability of chronically implanted arrays has been a formidable task because the sensor recording sites can be influenced by biotic and abiotic responses. Several studies have implicated changes in electrical interface impedance as a preliminary marker to infer electrode viability. Microelectrode impedance plays an important role in the monitoring of low amplitude and high-resolution extracellular neural signals. In this work, we seek to quantify long-term microelectrode array functionality and derive an impedance-based predictor for electrode functionality that correlates the recording site electrical properties with the functional neuronal recordings in vivo. High temporal resolution metrics of this type would allow one to assess, predict, and improve electrode performance in the future. In a large cohort of animals, we performed daily impedance measurements and neural signal recordings over long periods (up to 21 weeks) of time in rats using tungsten microwire arrays implanted into the somatosensory cortex. This study revealed that there was a time-varying trend in the modulation of impedance that was related to electrode performance. Single units were best detected from electrodes at time points when the electrode entered into the 40-150 KΩ impedance range. This impedance trend was modeled across the full cohort of animals to predict future electrode performance. The model was tested on data from all animals and was able to provide predictions of electrode performance chronically. Insight from this study can be combined with knowledge of electrode materials and histological analysis to provide a more comprehensive predictive model of electrode failure in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22442134     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/2/026028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  44 in total

1.  Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain.

Authors:  Joseph W Salatino; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai; Erin K Purcell
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  Toward guiding principles for the design of biologically-integrated electrodes for the central nervous system.

Authors:  Cort H Thompson; Ti'Air E Riggins; Paras R Patel; Cynthia A Chestek; Wen Li; Erin Purcell
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 3.  Functional electrical stimulation and spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Chester H Ho; Ronald J Triolo; Anastasia L Elias; Kevin L Kilgore; Anthony F DiMarco; Kath Bogie; Albert H Vette; Musa L Audu; Rudi Kobetic; Sarah R Chang; K Ming Chan; Sean Dukelow; Dennis J Bourbeau; Steven W Brose; Kenneth J Gustafson; Zelma H T Kiss; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.784

4.  Zwitterionic Polymer Coating Suppresses Microglial Encapsulation to Neural Implants In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Qianru Yang; Bingchen Wu; James R Eles; Alberto L Vazquez; Takashi D Y Kozai; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  Adv Biosyst       Date:  2020-05-04

5.  Electrodeposited platinum-iridium coating improves in vivo recording performance of chronically implanted microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Isaac R Cassar; Chunxiu Yu; Jaydeep Sambangi; Curtis D Lee; John J Whalen; Artin Petrossians; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  In vivo polymerization of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) in the living rat hippocampus does not cause a significant loss of performance in a delayed alternation task.

Authors:  Liangqi Ouyang; Crystal L Shaw; Chin-Chen Kuo; Amy L Griffin; David C Martin
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Rapid evaluation of the durability of cortical neural implants using accelerated aging with reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Pavel Takmakov; Kiersten Ruda; K Scott Phillips; Irada S Isayeva; Victor Krauthamer; Cristin G Welle
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Intracranial EEG fluctuates over months after implanting electrodes in human brain.

Authors:  Hoameng Ung; Steven N Baldassano; Hank Bink; Abba M Krieger; Shawniqua Williams; Flavia Vitale; Chengyuan Wu; Dean Freestone; Ewan Nurse; Kent Leyde; Kathryn A Davis; Mark Cook; Brian Litt
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Failure mode analysis of silicon-based intracortical microelectrode arrays in non-human primates.

Authors:  James C Barrese; Naveen Rao; Kaivon Paroo; Corey Triebwasser; Carlos Vargas-Irwin; Lachlan Franquemont; John P Donoghue
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.