Literature DB >> 24503720

In vivo polymerization of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) in the living rat hippocampus does not cause a significant loss of performance in a delayed alternation task.

Liangqi Ouyang1, Crystal L Shaw, Chin-Chen Kuo, Amy L Griffin, David C Martin.   

Abstract

After extended implantation times, traditional intracortical neural probes exhibit a foreign-body reaction characterized by a reactive glial sheath that has been associated with increased system impedance and signal deterioration. Previously, we have proposed that the local in vivo polymerization of an electronically and ionically conducting polymer, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), might help to rebuild charge transport pathways across the glial scar between the device and surrounding parenchyma (Richardson-Burns et al 2007 J. Neural Eng. 4 L6-13). The EDOT monomer can be delivered via a microcannula/electrode system into the brain tissue of living animals followed by direct electrochemical polymerization, using the electrode itself as a source of oxidative current. In this study, we investigated the long-term effect of local in vivo PEDOT deposition on hippocampal neural function and histology. Rodent subjects were trained on a hippocampus-dependent task, delayed alternation (DA), and implanted with the microcannula/electrode system in the hippocampus. The animals were divided into four groups with different delay times between the initial surgery and the electrochemical polymerization: (1) control (no polymerization), (2) immediate (polymerization within 5 min of device implantation), (3) early (polymerization within 3-4 weeks after implantation) and (4) late (polymerization 7-8 weeks after polymerization). System impedance at 1 kHz was recorded and the tissue reactions were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. We found that under our deposition conditions, PEDOT typically grew at the tip of the electrode, forming an ∼500 µm cloud in the tissue. This is much larger than the typical width of the glial scar (∼150 µm). After polymerization, the impedance amplitude near the neurologically important frequency of 1 kHz dropped for all the groups; however, there was a time window of 3-4 weeks for an optimal decrease in impedance. For all surgery-polymerization time intervals, the polymerization did not cause significant deficits in performance of the DA task, suggesting that hippocampal function was not impaired by PEDOT deposition. However, GFAP+ and ED-1+ cells were also found at the deposition two weeks after the polymerization, suggesting potential secondary scarring. Therefore, less extensive deposition or milder deposition conditions may be desirable to minimize this scarring while maintaining decreased system impedance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24503720      PMCID: PMC4124934          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/026005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  45 in total

1.  Information conveyed through brain-control: cursor versus robot.

Authors:  Dawn M Taylor; Stephen I Helms Tillery; Andrew B Schwartz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Rio J Vetter; Justin C Williams; Jamille F Hetke; Elizabeth A Nunamaker; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Cortical neural prosthetics.

Authors:  Andrew B Schwartz
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 4.  Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles.

Authors:  György Buzsáki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Microglial cell population dynamics in the injured adult central nervous system.

Authors:  Rune Ladeby; Martin Wirenfeldt; Daniel Garcia-Ovejero; Christina Fenger; Lasse Dissing-Olesen; Ishar Dalmau; Bente Finsen
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2005-04

6.  Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Roy Biran; David C Martin; Patrick A Tresco
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  The effect of resveratrol on neurodegeneration and blood brain barrier stability surrounding intracortical microelectrodes.

Authors:  Kelsey A Potter; Amy C Buck; Wade K Self; Megan E Callanan; Smrithi Sunil; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Microglial and macrophage reactions mark progressive changes and define the penumbra in the rat neocortex and striatum after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion.

Authors:  E Lehrmann; T Christensen; J Zimmer; N H Diemer; B Finsen
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1997-09-29       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Cerebral astrocyte response to micromachined silicon implants.

Authors:  J N Turner; W Shain; D H Szarowski; M Andersen; S Martins; M Isaacson; H Craighead
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  Controlled release of anti-inflammatory agent alpha-MSH from neural implants.

Authors:  Yinghui Zhong; Ravi V Bellamkonda
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 9.776

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  The rise of plastic bioelectronics.

Authors:  Takao Someya; Zhenan Bao; George G Malliaras
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Conducting polymer electrodes for auditory brainstem implants.

Authors:  Amélie A Guex; Nicolas Vachicouras; Ariel E Hight; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee; Stéphanie P Lacour
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 3.  Semiconducting Polymers for Neural Applications.

Authors:  Ivan B Dimov; Maximilian Moser; George G Malliaras; Iain McCulloch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Genetically targeted chemical assembly of functional materials in living cells, tissues, and animals.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Yoon Seok Kim; Claire E Richardson; Ariane Tom; Charu Ramakrishnan; Fikri Birey; Toru Katsumata; Shucheng Chen; Cheng Wang; Xiao Wang; Lydia-Marie Joubert; Yuanwen Jiang; Huiliang Wang; Lief E Fenno; Jeffrey B-H Tok; Sergiu P Pașca; Kang Shen; Zhenan Bao; Karl Deisseroth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Poly[3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene (EDOT) -co- 1,3,5-tri[2-(3,4-ethylene dioxythienyl)]-benzene (EPh)] copolymers (PEDOT-co-EPh): optical, electrochemical and mechanical properties.

Authors:  Liangqi Ouyang; Chin-Chen Kuo; Brendan Farrell; Sheevangi Pathak; Bin Wei; Jing Qu; David C Martin
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 6.  Conducting Polymers for Neural Prosthetic and Neural Interface Applications.

Authors:  Rylie Green; Mohammad Reza Abidian
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 7.  How is flexible electronics advancing neuroscience research?

Authors:  Yihang Chen; Nicholas J Rommelfanger; Ali I Mahdi; Xiang Wu; Scott T Keene; Abdulmalik Obaid; Alberto Salleo; Huiliang Wang; Guosong Hong
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Clinical Potential of Nerve Input to Tumors: A Bioelectricity Perspective.

Authors:  Jade A Phillips; Charlotte Hutchings; Mustafa B A Djamgoz
Journal:  Bioelectricity       Date:  2021-03-16

9.  Enhanced PEDOT adhesion on solid substrates with electrografted P(EDOT-NH2).

Authors:  Liangqi Ouyang; Bin Wei; Chin-Chen Kuo; Sheevangi Pathak; Brendan Farrell; David C Martin
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Electronic plants.

Authors:  Eleni Stavrinidou; Roger Gabrielsson; Eliot Gomez; Xavier Crispin; Ove Nilsson; Daniel T Simon; Magnus Berggren
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.