Literature DB >> 22442081

Perceptual inference predicts contextual modulations of sensory responses.

Timm Lochmann1, Udo A Ernst, Sophie Denève.   

Abstract

Sensory receptive fields (RFs) vary as a function of stimulus properties and measurement methods. Previous stimuli or surrounding stimuli facilitate, suppress, or change the selectivity of sensory neurons' responses. Here, we propose that these spatiotemporal contextual dependencies are signatures of efficient perceptual inference and can be explained by a single neural mechanism, input targeted divisive inhibition. To respond both selectively and reliably, sensory neurons should behave as active predictors rather than passive filters. In particular, they should remove input they can predict ("explain away") from the synaptic inputs to all other neurons. This implies that RFs are constantly and dynamically reshaped by the spatial and temporal context, while the true selectivity of sensory neurons resides in their "predictive field." This approach motivates a reinvestigation of sensory representations and particularly the role and specificity of surround suppression and adaptation in sensory areas.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22442081      PMCID: PMC6621224          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0817-11.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  26 in total

1.  Input-gain control produces feature-specific surround suppression.

Authors:  Alexander R Trott; Richard T Born
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of spike-triggered negative feedback on receptive-field properties.

Authors:  Eugenio Urdapilleta; Inés Samengo
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Temporal Contingencies Determine Whether Adaptation Strengthens or Weakens Normalization.

Authors:  Amir Aschner; Samuel G Solomon; Michael S Landy; David J Heeger; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Relating Divisive Normalization to Neuronal Response Variability.

Authors:  Ruben Coen-Cagli; Selina S Solomon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Normalized value coding explains dynamic adaptation in the human valuation process.

Authors:  Mel W Khaw; Paul W Glimcher; Kenway Louie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Adaptive coding for dynamic sensory inference.

Authors:  Wiktor F Młynarski; Ann M Hermundstad
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Moving sensory adaptation beyond suppressive effects in single neurons.

Authors:  Samuel G Solomon; Adam Kohn
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Population-wide distributions of neural activity during perceptual decision-making.

Authors:  Adrien Wohrer; Mark D Humphries; Christian K Machens
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 9.  Stimulus- and goal-oriented frameworks for understanding natural vision.

Authors:  Maxwell H Turner; Luis Gonzalo Sanchez Giraldo; Odelia Schwartz; Fred Rieke
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Limited Evidence for Sensory Prediction Error Responses in Visual Cortex of Macaques and Humans.

Authors:  Selina S Solomon; Huizhen Tang; Elyse Sussman; Adam Kohn
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.