Literature DB >> 25810527

Input-gain control produces feature-specific surround suppression.

Alexander R Trott1, Richard T Born2.   

Abstract

In primary visual cortex (V1), neuronal responses are sensitive to context. For example, responses to stimuli presented within the receptive field (RF) center are often suppressed by stimuli within the RF surround, and this suppression tends to be strongest when the center and surround stimuli match. We sought to identify the mechanism that gives rise to these properties of surround modulation. To do so, we exploited the stability of implanted multielectrode arrays to record from neurons in V1 of alert monkeys with multiple stimulus sets that more exhaustively probed center-surround interactions. We first replicated previous results concerning center-surround similarity using gratings representing all combinations of center and surround orientation. With this stimulus set, the surround simply scaled population responses to the center, such that the overall population tuning curve had the same shape and peak response. However, when the center contained two superimposed gratings (i.e., a visual "plaid"), one component of which always matched the surround orientation, suppression selectively affected the portion of the response driven by the matching center component, thereby producing shifts in the peak of the population orientation tuning curve. In effect, the surround caused neurons to respond predominantly to the component grating of the center plaid that was unmatched to the surround grating, as if by reducing the effective strength of whichever stimulus attributes were matched to the surround. These results provide key physiological support for theoretical models that propose feature-specific, input-gain control as the mechanism underlying surround suppression.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/354973-10$15.00/0.

Keywords:  efficient coding; input gain; surround suppression

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25810527      PMCID: PMC4389596          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4000-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  40 in total

1.  Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  M P Sceniak; D L Ringach; M J Hawken; R Shapley
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; L Chelazzi; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Interacting roles of attention and visual salience in V4.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  James R Cavanaugh; Wyeth Bair; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities.

Authors:  A M Sillito; K L Grieve; H E Jones; J Cudeiro; J Davis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-11-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Direction- and velocity-specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field in the middle temporal visual area (MT).

Authors:  J Allman; F Miezin; E McGuinness
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Attentional modulation of MT neurons with single or multiple stimuli in their receptive fields.

Authors:  Joonyeol Lee; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Adaptation maintains population homeostasis in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Andrea Benucci; Aman B Saleem; Matteo Carandini
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Corticocortical feedback increases the spatial extent of normalization.

Authors:  Jonathan J Nassi; Camille Gómez-Laberge; Gabriel Kreiman; Richard T Born
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-30
View more
  11 in total

1.  Temporal Contingencies Determine Whether Adaptation Strengthens or Weakens Normalization.

Authors:  Amir Aschner; Samuel G Solomon; Michael S Landy; David J Heeger; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Relating Divisive Normalization to Neuronal Response Variability.

Authors:  Ruben Coen-Cagli; Selina S Solomon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  End-Stopping Predicts Curvature Tuning along the Ventral Stream.

Authors:  Carlos R Ponce; Till S Hartmann; Margaret S Livingstone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Feedforward mechanisms of cross-orientation interactions in mouse V1.

Authors:  Dylan Barbera; Nicholas J Priebe; Lindsey L Glickfeld
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  The specificity of orientation-tuned normalization within human early visual cortex.

Authors:  Michaela Klímová; Ilona M Bloem; Sam Ling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Heterogeneous side effects of cortical inactivation in behaving animals.

Authors:  Ariana R Andrei; Samantha Debes; Mircea Chelaru; Xiaoqin Liu; Elsa Rodarte; John L Spudich; Roger Janz; Valentin Dragoi
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Sensory noise predicts divisive reshaping of receptive fields.

Authors:  Matthew Chalk; Paul Masset; Sophie Deneve; Boris Gutkin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Perceptual Mechanisms of Visual Hallucinations and Illusions in Psychosis.

Authors:  Samuel D Klein; Cheryl A Olman; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  J Psychiatr Brain Sci       Date:  2020-08-21

9.  Distinct spatiotemporal mechanisms underlie extra-classical receptive field modulation in macaque V1 microcircuits.

Authors:  Christopher A Henry; Mehrdad Jazayeri; Robert M Shapley; Michael J Hawken
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Specificity and timescales of cortical adaptation as inferences about natural movie statistics.

Authors:  Michoel Snow; Ruben Coen-Cagli; Odelia Schwartz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.