Literature DB >> 29133418

Normalized value coding explains dynamic adaptation in the human valuation process.

Mel W Khaw1, Paul W Glimcher2,3, Kenway Louie4,3.   

Abstract

The notion of subjective value is central to choice theories in ecology, economics, and psychology, serving as an integrated decision variable by which options are compared. Subjective value is often assumed to be an absolute quantity, determined in a static manner by the properties of an individual option. Recent neurobiological studies, however, have shown that neural value coding dynamically adapts to the statistics of the recent reward environment, introducing an intrinsic temporal context dependence into the neural representation of value. Whether valuation exhibits this kind of dynamic adaptation at the behavioral level is unknown. Here, we show that the valuation process in human subjects adapts to the history of previous values, with current valuations varying inversely with the average value of recently observed items. The dynamics of this adaptive valuation are captured by divisive normalization, linking these temporal context effects to spatial context effects in decision making as well as spatial and temporal context effects in perception. These findings suggest that adaptation is a universal feature of neural information processing and offer a unifying explanation for contextual phenomena in fields ranging from visual psychophysics to economic choice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; context dependence; decision making; divisive normalization; reward

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29133418      PMCID: PMC5715785          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715293114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

Review 1.  The "silent" surround of V1 receptive fields: theory and experiments.

Authors:  Peggy Seriès; Jean Lorenceau; Yves Frégnac
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2003 Jul-Nov

2.  The influence of surround suppression on adaptation effects in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Stephanie C Wissig; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits.

Authors:  Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Sensory adaptation.

Authors:  Barry Wark; Brian Nils Lundstrom; Adrienne Fairhall
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Context-dependency in valuation.

Authors:  Agnieszka Tymula; Hilke Plassmann
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  A negative contrast effect in newborns.

Authors:  K R Kobre; L P Lipsitt
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1972-08

7.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method.

Authors:  G M Becker; M H DeGroot; J Marschak
Journal:  Behav Sci       Date:  1964-07

8.  BOLD subjective value signals exhibit robust range adaptation.

Authors:  Karin M Cox; Joseph W Kable
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation.

Authors:  Matteo Carandini; David J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  A normalization model of multisensory integration.

Authors:  Tomokazu Ohshiro; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  20 in total

1.  Context effects on probability estimation.

Authors:  Wei-Hsiang Lin; Justin L Gardner; Shih-Wei Wu
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 8.029

2.  An Analysis of Decision under Risk in Rats.

Authors:  Christine M Constantinople; Alex T Piet; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Time preferences are reliable across time-horizons and verbal versus experiential tasks.

Authors:  Evgeniya Lukinova; Yuyue Wang; Steven F Lehrer; Jeffrey C Erlich
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Optimal policy for attention-modulated decisions explains human fixation behavior.

Authors:  Anthony I Jang; Ravi Sharma; Jan Drugowitsch
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Advances in modeling learning and decision-making in neuroscience.

Authors:  Anne G E Collins; Amitai Shenhav
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 6.  Efficiently irrational: deciphering the riddle of human choice.

Authors:  Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 24.482

7.  Human value learning and representation reflect rational adaptation to task demands.

Authors:  Keno Juechems; Tugba Altun; Rita Hira; Andreas Jarvstad
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-05-30

8.  Divisive normalization does influence decisions with multiple alternatives.

Authors:  Ryan Webb; Paul W Glimcher; Kenway Louie
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-09-14

9.  The evil of banality: When choosing between the mundane feels like choosing between the worst.

Authors:  Amitai Shenhav; Carolyn K Dean Wolf; Uma R Karmarkar
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-05-17

10.  Attraction to similar options: The Gestalt law of proximity is related to the attraction effect.

Authors:  Liz Izakson; Yoav Zeevi; Dino J Levy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.