Literature DB >> 15982389

Defining negative margins in DCIS patients treated with breast conservation therapy: The University of Chicago experience.

Sunati Sahoo1, Wendy M Recant, Nora Jaskowiak, Liping Tong, Ruth Heimann.   

Abstract

Management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has been evolving and the majority of women are now being treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy (i.e. breast conservation therapy [BCT]). Controversies still exist regarding the histologic features and margin status that are associated with local recurrence. The goal of this study was to review our institution's experience in patients diagnosed with DCIS and treated with BCT to determine pathologic features that can predict local recurrence, with particular emphasis on the final surgical margin status. We analyzed 103 consecutive patients with DCIS who were treated with BCT between 1986 and 2000. The slides were reviewed to determine the final margin status, type of DCIS, size of DCIS, nuclear grade, presence of necrosis and calcification, and volume of excised specimen. Margins were considered positive when DCIS touched or was transected at an inked margin. Negative margins were further categorized as close (less than 1 mm), 1--5 mm, and more than 5 mm. The size of the DCIS was determined based on either the maximal dimension on a slide or from the number of consecutive slides containing DCIS. Morphology and immunohistochemical profiles of the recurrent DCIS cases were compared with original DCIS. All patients were treated uniformly with external beam radiation therapy to the entire breast (median dose 46 Gy) with a boost to the tumor bed (median dose 14 Gy). The median follow-up was 63 months (range 7--191 months). The actuarial 5-year local control rate was 89%. The median time to local recurrence was 55 months. There were 13 local recurrences, of which 9 recurred as pure DCIS and 4 as invasive ductal carcinomas. Univariate analysis showed a significant association with local recurrence for positive margin (p=0.008), high nuclear grade (p=0.02), and young age at diagnosis (p=0.03). If margins were negative, the 5-year local control was 93%, as compared to 69% if margins were positive. A multivariate analysis showed that early age at diagnosis, positive margin status, and high nuclear grade were independently associated with local recurrence. The morphology and immunohistochemical stains of all nine recurrent DCIS were similar to those of the original DCIS. Breast conservation can be achieved with excellent local control by obtaining microscopically negative margins as strictly defined by DCIS not touching the inked surgical margins, and postoperative radiation that includes boost therapy to the tumor bed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15982389     DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2005.21617.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  9 in total

1.  Young age is not associated with increased local recurrence for DCIS treated by breast-conserving surgery and radiation.

Authors:  Aruna Turaka; Gary M Freedman; Tianyu Li; Penny R Anderson; Ramona Swaby; Nicos Nicolaou; Lori Goldstein; Elin R Sigurdson; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Network meta-analysis of margin threshold for women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Haitao Chu; Tatyana Shamliyan; Hawre Jalal; Karen M Kuntz; Robert L Kane; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Is DCIS breast cancer, and how do I treat it?

Authors:  N Bijker; M Donker; J Wesseling; G J den Heeten; E J Th Rutgers
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2013-03

Review 4.  Association between patient and tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Tatyana Shamliyan; Shi-Yi Wang; Beth A Virnig; Todd M Tuttle; Robert L Kane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

Review 5.  The Association of Surgical Margins and Local Recurrence in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  M Luke Marinovich; Lamiae Azizi; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Monica Morrow; Lawrence J Solin; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Final results from a multicenter prospective study ( JROSG 05-5) on postoperative radiotherapy for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ with an involved surgical margin or close margin widths of 1 mm or less.

Authors:  Naoto Shikama; Kenji Sekiguchi; Naoki Nakamura; Hiroshi Sekine; Yuko Nakayama; Kazufumi Imanaka; Takeshi Akiba; Masahiko Aoki; Yoshiomi Hatayama; Etsuyo Ogo; Yoshikazu Kagami; Miho Kawashima; Kumiko Karasawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Polygon method: A systematic margin assessment for breast conservation.

Authors:  Shu Ichihara; Suzuko Moritani; Rieko Nishimura; Mikinao Oiwa; Takako Morita; Takako Hayashi; Aya Kato; Tokiko Endo; Akiko Kada; Noriko Ito; Tetsuo Kuroishi; Yasuyuki Sato
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Evaluation of resection margins in breast conservation therapy: the pathology perspective-past, present, and future.

Authors:  Rajyasree Emmadi; Elizabeth L Wiley
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-11-19

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging system for intraoperative margin assessment for DCIS and invasive breast cancer using the ClearSight™ system in breast-conserving surgery-Results from a postmarketing study.

Authors:  Marc Thill; Iris Szwarcfiter; Katharina Kelling; Viviane van Haasteren; Eyal Kolka; Josefa Noelke; Zachi Peles; Moshe Papa; Sebastian Aulmann; Tanir Allweis
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.885

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.