Literature DB >> 32794031

Prognostic Score-Based Stratification Analysis Reveals Universal Benefits of Radiotherapy on Lowering the Risk of Ipsilateral Breast Event for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients with Different Risk Levels.

Libo Yang1,2,3, Dongli Lu4, Yutian Lai5, Mengjia Shen1,2,3, Qiuxiao Yu6, Ting Lei1,2,3, Tianjie Pu1,2,3, Hong Bu7,8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the effects of radiotherapy (RT) on the incidence rate of ipsilateral breast event (IBE) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients with lumpectomy after being stratified by prognostic score.
METHODS: We identified DCIS patients who received lumpectomy, from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1988 to 2015. Cumulative incidence functions for competing risk were used to evaluate the effects of RT on IBE risk over time. Three multivariate regression models (weighted, non-weighted, and Fine-Gray) were applied to compare the IBE risk between the RT and non-RT groups after stratifying patients by prognostic score.
RESULTS: Overall, 72,623 DCIS patients were identified from the SEER database and 49,206 (66.8%) patients received RT. During the follow-up period (ranging from 7 to 347 months), the cumulative probability of invasive and in situ IBE was significantly lower in the RT group than in the non-RT group (p < 0.001). After being stratified by prognostic score, the weighted IBE incidence rate increased as the risk level increased (p < 0.050). In multivariate regression models, RT lowered the IBE incidence rate by at least 30% in low-, moderate-, and high-risk DCIS (p < 0.010). In particular, the in situ and invasive IBE incidence rate decreased by over 50% in low-risk DCIS with RT (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: RT is associated with a lowered IBE incidence rate in DCIS patients, regardless of the assigned risk levels for patients. The significant reduction in the IBE incidence rate in low-risk DCIS patients also indicates the potential benefits for recommending RT to such a patient population in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32794031     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09003-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  49 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Steven A Narod; Javaid Iqbal; Vasily Giannakeas; Victoria Sopik; Ping Sun
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Twenty-Five Year Trends in the Incidence of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in US Women.

Authors:  Tawakalitu O Oseni; Biqi Zhang; Suzanne B Coopey; Michele A Gadd; Kevin S Hughes; David C Chang
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  The natural history of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Melinda E Sanders; Peggy A Schuyler; William D Dupont; David L Page
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Characteristics and behaviour of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison with symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Valerie Cui Yun Koh; Jeffrey Chun Tatt Lim; Aye Aye Thike; Poh Yian Cheok; Minn Minn Myint Thu; Veronique Kiak Mien Tan; Benita Kiat Tee Tan; Kong Wee Ong; Gay Hui Ho; Wai Jin Tan; Yongcheng Tan; Ahmed Syed Salahuddin; Inny Busmanis; Angela Pek Yoon Chong; Jabed Iqbal; Shyamala Thilagaratnam; Jill Su Lin Wong; Puay Hoon Tan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Cancer Outcomes in DCIS Patients Without Locoregional Treatment.

Authors:  Marc D Ryser; Donald L Weaver; Fengmin Zhao; Mathias Worni; Lars J Grimm; Roman Gulati; Ruth Etzioni; Terry Hyslop; Sandra J Lee; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Waiting times from abnormal breast screen to diagnosis in 7 Canadian provinces.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; C Bancej; V Goel; J Snider; R G McAuley; B Irvine; L Kan; D Mirsky; M J Sabine; R McGilly; J S Caines
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Annette Molinaro; Imok Cha; Britt-Marie Ljung; Virginia L Ernster; Kim Stewart; Karen Chew; Dan H Moore; Fred Waldman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  The method of detection of ductal carcinoma in situ has no therapeutic implications: results of a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lotte E Elshof; Michael Schaapveld; Emiel J Rutgers; Marjanka K Schmidt; Linda de Munck; Flora E van Leeuwen; Jelle Wesseling
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Cause-specific Mortality in a Population-based Cohort of 9799 Women Treated for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Lotte E Elshof; Marjanka K Schmidt; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Flora E van Leeuwen; Jelle Wesseling; Michael Schaapveld
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: to treat or not to treat, that is the question.

Authors:  Maartje van Seijen; Esther H Lips; Alastair M Thompson; Serena Nik-Zainal; Andrew Futreal; E Shelley Hwang; Ellen Verschuur; Joanna Lane; Jos Jonkers; Daniel W Rea; Jelle Wesseling
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Oncologic Outcome of Endoscopic-Assisted Breast Surgery Compared with the Conventional Approach in Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Hung-Wen Lai
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Molecular subtyping reveals uniqueness of prognosis in breast ductal carcinoma in situ patients with lumpectomy.

Authors:  Libo Yang; Mengjia Shen; Yan Qiu; Tingting Tang; Hong Bu
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.254

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.