Literature DB >> 26008609

Fatigue-induced microdamage in cancellous bone occurs distant from resorption cavities and trabecular surfaces.

M G Goff1, F M Lambers2, T M Nguyen2, J Sung3, C M Rimnac4, C J Hernandez5.   

Abstract

Impaired bone toughness is increasingly recognized as a contributor to fragility fractures. At the tissue level, toughness is related to the ability of bone tissue to resist the development of microscopic cracks or other tissue damage. While most of our understanding of microdamage is derived from studies of cortical bone, the majority of fragility fractures occur in regions of the skeleton dominated by cancellous bone. The development of tissue microdamage in cancellous bone may differ from that in cortical bone due to differences in microstructure and tissue ultrastructure. To gain insight into how microdamage accumulates in cancellous bone we determined the changes in number, size and location of microdamage sites following different amounts of cyclic compressive loading. Human vertebral cancellous bone specimens (n=32, 10 male donors, 6 female donors, age 76 ± 8.8, mean ± SD) were subjected to sub-failure cyclic compressive loading and microdamage was evaluated in three-dimensions. Only a few large microdamage sites (the largest 10%) accounted for 70% of all microdamage caused by cyclic loading. The number of large microdamage sites was a better predictor of reductions in Young's modulus caused by cyclic loading than overall damage volume fraction (DV/BV). The majority of microdamage volume (69.12 ± 7.04%) was located more than 30 μm (the average erosion depth) from trabecular surfaces, suggesting that microdamage occurs primarily within interstitial regions of cancellous bone. Additionally, microdamage was less likely to be near resorption cavities than other bone surfaces (p<0.05), challenging the idea that stress risers caused by resorption cavities influence fatigue failure of cancellous bone. Together, these findings suggest that reductions in apparent level mechanical performance during fatigue loading are the result of only a few large microdamage sites and that microdamage accumulation in fatigue is likely dominated by heterogeneity in tissue material properties rather than stress concentrations caused by micro-scale geometry.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Bone mechanics; Bone quality; Cancellous bone; Microdamage

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26008609      PMCID: PMC4501884          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  37 in total

1.  Sequential labelling of microdamage in bone using chelating agents.

Authors:  T C Lee; T L Arthur; L J Gibson; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Microdamage accumulation in bovine trabecular bone in uniaxial compression.

Authors:  T L Arthur Moore; L J Gibson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  The effect of bone microstructure on the initiation and growth of microcracks.

Authors:  Fergal J O'Brien; David Taylor; T Clive Lee
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  A biomechanical analysis of the effects of resorption cavities on cancellous bone strength.

Authors:  Christopher J Hernandez; Atul Gupta; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Who's afraid of the big bad Wolff?: "Wolff's law" and bone functional adaptation.

Authors:  Christopher Ruff; Brigitte Holt; Erik Trinkaus
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Stress-concentrating effect of resorption lacunae in trabecular bone.

Authors:  L M McNamara; J C Van der Linden; H Weinans; P J Prendergast
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  The effects of misalignment during in vivo loading of bone: techniques to detect the proximity of objects in three-dimensional models.

Authors:  M G Goff; K L Chang; E N Litts; C J Hernandez
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The effects of tensile-compressive loading mode and microarchitecture on microdamage in human vertebral cancellous bone.

Authors:  Floor M Lambers; Amanda R Bouman; Evgeniy V Tkachenko; Tony M Keaveny; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Association between non-enzymatic glycation, resorption, and microdamage in human tibial cortices.

Authors:  Ani Ural; Colleen Janeiro; Lamya Karim; Tamim Diab; Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Increased fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: an overview of the underlying mechanisms and the usefulness of imaging modalities and fracture risk assessment tools.

Authors:  Ellis A C de Waard; Tineke A C M van Geel; Hans H C M Savelberg; Annemarie Koster; Piet P M M Geusens; Joop P W van den Bergh
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  5 in total

1.  Examining the influence of PTH(1-34) on tissue strength and composition.

Authors:  Joseph D Gardinier; Salam Al-Omaishi; Niloufar Rostami; Michael D Morris; David H Kohn
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  Bone Microdamage in Acute Knee Injury.

Authors:  Logeswaran Selvarajah; Annie M Curtis; Oran D Kennedy
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  The roles of architecture and estrogen depletion in microdamage risk in trabecular bone.

Authors:  Tyler C Kreipke; Jacqueline G Garrison; Jeremiah Easley; A Simon Turner; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Finite element models predict the location of microdamage in cancellous bone following uniaxial loading.

Authors:  M G Goff; F M Lambers; R M Sorna; T M Keaveny; C J Hernandez
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review.

Authors:  Fangxing Wang; Leyu Zheng; Jan Theopold; Stefan Schleifenbaum; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde; Georg Osterhoff
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.359

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.