Literature DB >> 22433767

Estimating preference-based single index measures for dementia using DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy.

Donna Rowen1, Brendan Mulhern, Sube Banerjee, Ben van Hout, Tracey A Young, Martin Knapp, Sarah C Smith, Donna L Lamping, John E Brazier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although condition-specific measures are commonly used in dementia, they cannot be used in analyses of cost per quality-adjusted life-year because they do not incorporate preferences. We addressed this gap by estimating two preference-based single index measures: the DEMQOL-U from the self-report DEMQOL (mild-to-moderate dementia severity) and the DEMQOL-Proxy-U from the carer-report DEMQOL-Proxy (all levels of dementia severity).
METHODS: We conducted valuation studies on 593 members of the general population (306 for the DEMQOL-U, 287 for the DEMQOL-Proxy-U) using the time trade-off elicitation technique. We then fitted a range of mean and individual-level multivariate regression models to the valuation data to derive preference weights for each measure. We applied the estimated weights to a large, clinically representative sample.
RESULTS: Mean observed time trade-off values ranged from 0.18 to 0.95 for DEMQOL-U and from 0.33 to 0.96 for DEMQOL-Proxy-U. The best performing models for each measure were main effects models estimated using individual-level data. DEMQOL-Proxy-U had inconsistent but insignificant coefficient estimates for one dimension. Models were estimated to remove these inconsistencies.
CONCLUSION: Preference-based single index measures from DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy for use in economic evaluation will enable economic evaluation using quality-adjusted life-years to be undertaken for people across the full range of dementia severity. Future research will examine how the utilities from each measure can be used and combined to populate cost-effectiveness models. Copyright Â
© 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22433767     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  30 in total

1.  Discrepancies between the Dermatology Life Quality Index and utility scores.

Authors:  Fanni Rencz; Petra Baji; László Gulácsi; Sarolta Kárpáti; Márta Péntek; Adrienn Katalin Poór; Valentin Brodszky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Development and refinement of the WAItE: a new obesity-specific quality of life measure for adolescents.

Authors:  Yemi Oluboyede; Claire Hulme; Andrew Hill
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  The Role of Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures in Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Donna Rowen; John Brazier; Roberta Ara; Ismail Azzabi Zouraq
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  A multidomain decision support tool to prevent falls in older people: the FinCH cluster RCT.

Authors:  Philippa A Logan; Jane C Horne; Frances Allen; Sarah J Armstrong; Allan B Clark; Simon Conroy; Janet Darby; Chris Fox; John Rf Gladman; Maureen Godfrey; Adam L Gordon; Lisa Irvine; Paul Leighton; Karen McCartney; Gail Mountain; Kate Robertson; Katie Robinson; Tracey H Sach; Susan Stirling; Edward Cf Wilson; Erika J Sims
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Health-related quality of life in people with advanced dementia: a comparison of EQ-5D-5L and QUALID instruments.

Authors:  Elizaveta Sopina; Lynn Chenoweth; Tim Luckett; Meera Agar; Georgina M Luscombe; Patricia M Davidson; Constance D Pond; Jane Phillips; Stephen Goodall
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Dementia Care Mapping™ to reduce agitation in care home residents with dementia: the EPIC cluster RCT.

Authors:  Claire A Surr; Ivana Holloway; Rebecca Ea Walwyn; Alys W Griffiths; David Meads; Rachael Kelley; Adam Martin; Vicki McLellan; Clive Ballard; Jane Fossey; Natasha Burnley; Lynn Chenoweth; Byron Creese; Murna Downs; Lucy Garrod; Elizabeth H Graham; Amanda Lilley-Kelley; Joanne McDermid; Holly Millard; Devon Perfect; Louise Robinson; Olivia Robinson; Emily Shoesmith; Najma Siddiqi; Graham Stokes; Daphne Wallace; Amanda J Farrin
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  How to measure quality of life in shared-housing arrangements? A comparison of dementia-specific instruments.

Authors:  Johannes Gräske; Hilde Verbeek; Paul Gellert; Thomas Fischer; Adelheid Kuhlmey; Karin Wolf-Ostermann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Inter-rater reliability of care home staff's proxy judgements with residents' assessments of their own health-related quality of life: an analysis of the PATCH trial EQ-5D data.

Authors:  Charlotte Kelly; Claire Hulme; Liz Graham; Alison Ellwood; Ismail Patel; Bonnie Cundill; Amanda Farrin; Madeline Goodwin; Karen Hull; Jill Fisher; Anne Forster
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  Binary choice health state valuation and mode of administration: head-to-head comparison of online and CAPI.

Authors:  Brendan Mulhern; Louise Longworth; John Brazier; Donna Rowen; Nick Bansback; Nancy Devlin; Aki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

10.  The use of global positional satellite location in dementia: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Heather Milne; Marjon van der Pol; Lucy McCloughan; Janet Hanley; Gillian Mead; John Starr; Aziz Sheikh; Brian McKinstry
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.