Literature DB >> 29052164

The Role of Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures in Health Technology Assessment.

Donna Rowen1, John Brazier2, Roberta Ara2, Ismail Azzabi Zouraq3.   

Abstract

A condition-specific preference-based measure (CSPBM) is a measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) that is specific to a certain condition or disease and that can be used to obtain the quality adjustment weight of the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for use in economic models. This article provides an overview of the role and the development of CSPBMs, and presents a description of existing CSPBMs in the literature. The article also provides an overview of the psychometric properties of CSPBMs in comparison with generic preference-based measures (generic PBMs), and considers the advantages and disadvantages of CSPBMs in comparison with generic PBMs. CSPBMs typically include dimensions that are important for that condition but may not be important across all patient groups. There are a large number of CSPBMs across a wide range of conditions, and these vary from covering a wide range of dimensions to more symptomatic or uni-dimensional measures. Psychometric evidence is limited but suggests that CSPBMs offer an advantage in more accurate measurement of milder health states. The mean change and standard deviation can differ for CSPBMs and generic PBMs, and this may impact on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. CSPBMs have a useful role in HTA where a generic PBM is not appropriate, sensitive or responsive. However, due to issues of comparability across different patient groups and interventions, their usage in health technology assessment is often limited to conditions where it is inappropriate to use a generic PBM or sensitivity analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29052164     DOI: 10.1007/s40273-017-0546-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  61 in total

1.  Economic evaluation in short bowel syndrome (SBS): an algorithm to estimate utility scores for a patient-reported SBS-specific quality of life scale (SBS-QoL™).

Authors:  Andrew Lloyd; Cicely Kerr; Katie Breheny; John Brazier; Aurora Ortiz; Emma Borg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Using DCE and ranking data to estimate cardinal values for health states for deriving a preference-based single index from the sexual quality of life questionnaire.

Authors:  Julie Ratcliffe; John Brazier; Aki Tsuchiya; Tara Symonds; Martin Brown
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Preference-based condition-specific measures of health: what happens to cross programme comparability?

Authors:  John Brazier; Aki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Estimation of a multiattribute utility function for the Spanish version of the TooL questionnaire.

Authors:  Angel Luis Montejo; Javier Correas-Lauffer; Jorge Mauriño; Guillermo Villa; Pablo Rebollo; Teresa Díez; Luis Cordero
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Development of a preference-based index from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25.

Authors:  Anne M Rentz; Jonathan W Kowalski; John G Walt; Ron D Hays; John E Brazier; Ren Yu; Paul Lee; Neil Bressler; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.389

6.  The validity of generic and condition-specific preference-based instruments: the ability to discriminate asthma control status.

Authors:  Helen M McTaggart-Cowan; Carlo A Marra; Yaling Yang; John E Brazier; Jacek A Kopec; J Mark FitzGerald; Aslam H Anis; Larry D Lynd
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Deriving a Preference-Based Measure for Myelofibrosis from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the MF-SAF.

Authors:  Clara Mukuria; Donna Rowen; John E Brazier; Tracey A Young; Beenish Nafees
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  QLU-C10D: a health state classification system for a multi-attribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30.

Authors:  M T King; D S J Costa; N K Aaronson; J E Brazier; D F Cella; P M Fayers; P Grimison; M Janda; G Kemmler; R Norman; A S Pickard; D Rowen; G Velikova; T A Young; R Viney
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Estimating a preference-based index for a menopause specific health quality of life questionnaire.

Authors:  John E Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Maria Platts; York F Zoellner
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Vision and quality of life: development of methods for the VisQoL vision-related utility instrument.

Authors:  Stuart Peacock; Roseanne Misajon; Angelo Iezzi; Jeff Richardson; Graeme Hawthorne; Jill Keeffe
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.648

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  An Educational Review About Using Cost Data for the Purpose of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Franklin; James Lomas; Simon Walker; Tracey Young
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Converting Parkinson-Specific Scores into Health State Utilities to Assess Cost-Utility Analysis.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Miguel A Garcia-Gordillo; Daniel Collado-Mateo; Borja Del Pozo-Cruz; José C Adsuar; José Manuel Cordero-Ferrera; José María Abellán-Perpiñán; Fernando Ignacio Sánchez-Martínez
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Valuation of preference-based measures: can existing preference data be used to select a smaller sample of health states?

Authors:  Samer A Kharroubi; Donna Rowen
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2018-07-06

4.  Modelling a preference-based index for EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L + Sleep using a Bayesian framework.

Authors:  Samer A Kharroubi; Yara S Beyh; John Brazier; Yaling Yang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Recommended Methods for the Collection of Health State Utility Value Evidence in Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Roberta Ara; John Brazier; Tracey Young
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  The Identification, Review and Synthesis of Health State Utility Values from the Literature.

Authors:  Roberta Ara; John Brazier; Tessa Peasgood; Suzy Paisley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Assessment of health state utilities in dermatology: an experimental time trade-off value set for the dermatology life quality index.

Authors:  Gábor Ruzsa; Fanni Rencz; Valentin Brodszky
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.077

8.  A systematic review of utility values in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Utsana Tonmukayakul; Long Khanh-Dao Le; Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage; Lidia Engel; Jessica Bucholc; Brendan Mulhern; Rob Carter; Cathrine Mihalopoulos
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  The Use of Health State Utility Values in Decision Models.

Authors:  Roberta Ara; John Brazier; Ismail Azzabi Zouraq
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Development of a preference-based heart disease-specific health state classification system using MacNew heart disease-related quality of life instrument.

Authors:  Sanjeewa Kularatna; Donna Rowen; Clara Mukuria; Steven McPhail; Gang Chen; Brendan Mulhern; Jennifer A Whitty; Joshua Byrnes; Paul Scuffham; John Atherton; Stefan Höfer; William Parsonage
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.