Literature DB >> 22433349

Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence.

Michele Jonsson Funk1, Pamela J Levin, Jennifer M Wu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the rates of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery from 2000 to 2009 by type of procedure, year, age, and region of the country.
METHODS: We used data between 2000 and 2009 from a database containing health care claims data from employer-based plans in the United States. We analyzed data for all women age 18-64 years, identifying all SUI procedures in this population. Rates per 100,000 person-years and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated each year by procedure type, age, and region.
RESULTS: The study population included 32.9 million women age 18-64 years observed for 74,007,937 person-years between 2000 and 2009. During that time, there were 182,110 SUI procedures for a rate of 246.1 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 239.7-252.6). The most common SUI surgery was sling (198.3 per 100,000 person-years, 95% CI 192.8-203.9) followed by Burch (25.9 per 100,000 person-years, 95% CI 24.8-27.2). There was a dramatic increase in slings, with a corresponding decrease in Burch procedures from 2000 to 2009. Other SUI surgeries had lower rates. Although this trend was evident across all regions, the Northeast had the lowest rate of SUI surgery, whereas rates in the West, Midwest, and South were 1.44-times, 1.76-times, and 2.09-times higher, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In a dramatic shift over the past decade, slings have become the dominant procedure for SUI among women age 18-64 years. Although this trend was seen across the United States, considerable variability exists in the SUI surgery rates by region. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22433349      PMCID: PMC3310349          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824b2e3e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  14 in total

Review 1.  Anterior vaginal repair for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  C M Glazener; K Cooper
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

2.  Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: "UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse".

Authors:  Miles Murphy; Adam Holzberg; Heather van Raalte; Neeraj Kohli; Howard B Goldman; Vincent Lucente
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Trends in inpatient urinary incontinence surgery in the USA, 1998-2007.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Mihir P Gandhi; Aparna D Shah; Jatin Y Shah; Rebekah G Fulton; Alison C Weidner
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Ambulatory procedures for female pelvic floor disorders in the United States.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Erekson; Vrishali V Lopes; Christina A Raker; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Annual direct cost of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  L Wilson; J S Brown; G P Shin; K O Luc; L L Subak
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Quality of life and seeking help in women with urinary incontinence.

Authors:  D Hägglund; M L Walker-Engström; G Larsson; J Leppert
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Procedures for urinary incontinence in the United States, 1979-1997.

Authors:  Sarah Hamilton Boyles; Anne M Weber; Leslie Meyn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Bladder neck needle suspension for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  C M A Glazener; K Cooper
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

Review 9.  Obesity and urinary incontinence: epidemiology and clinical research update.

Authors:  Leslee L Subak; Holly E Richter; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Three surgical procedures for genuine stress incontinence: five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  A Bergman; G Elia
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  29 in total

1.  Surgery for stress urinary incontinence in Finland 1987-2009.

Authors:  Kaisa Kurkijärvi; Riikka Aaltonen; Mika Gissler; Juha Mäkinen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Regenerative medicine based applications to combat stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Hatim Thaker; Arun K Sharma
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  What if you could not do a mid-urethral sling?

Authors:  Steven Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Midurethral sling complications.

Authors:  Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Comparing the risk of urethrolysis for the treatment of voiding dysfunction between two retropubic mesh slings: a case-control study.

Authors:  Amie Kawasaki; Autumn L Edenfield; Anthony G Visco; Jennifer M Wu; Daniel Westreich; Nazema Y Siddiqui
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Surgeons' views on sling tensioning during surgery for female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Ali Borazjani; Javier Pizarro-Berdichevsky; Jianbo Li; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Pelvic floor symptoms and bone mineral density in women undergoing osteoporosis evaluation.

Authors:  Holly E Richter; Sarah L Morgan; Jonathan L Gleason; Jeff M Szychowski; Patricia S Goode; Kathryn L Burgio
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Sling revision/removal for mesh erosion and urinary retention: long-term risk and predictors.

Authors:  Michele Jonsson Funk; Nazema Y Siddiqui; Virginia Pate; Cindy L Amundsen; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Pelvic floor disorders following vaginal or cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Hafsa Memon; Victoria L Handa
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.927

10.  Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries, 2002-2007.

Authors:  Lisa Rogo-Gupta; Mark S Litwin; Christopher S Saigal; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.