Literature DB >> 12861141

Procedures for urinary incontinence in the United States, 1979-1997.

Sarah Hamilton Boyles1, Anne M Weber, Leslie Meyn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to describe the national rates of surgery for urinary incontinence in women. STUDY
DESIGN: We used the National Hospital Discharge Survey, a federal database that samples inpatient hospitals in the United States. Data from 1979 to 1997 were analyzed for diagnoses and procedures coded by using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification, classification system. Age-adjusted rates were calculated by using the 1990 census population and compared for change over time with the score test for linear trend.
RESULTS: The number of women undergoing inpatient surgery for urinary incontinence has varied from 33000 in 1979 to 85000 in 1993. The rate of surgeries for incontinence has almost doubled, from 0.32 procedures per 1000 women per year in 1979 to 0.60 procedures per 1000 women per year in 1997 (P =.02). The number of suprapubic slings performed increased over time. Approximately 2100 slings were performed per year until 1996, when 7348 were performed, followed by 10,192 in 1997 (rate increase from 12 to 75.2 per 1000000 women per year, P =.03). Women undergoing incontinence procedures were 79% white, 3% African American, and the remaining 18% other (including unknown). Thirty-seven percent of cases were performed in the South, 25% in the Midwest and West, and 12% in the Northeast. From 1979 to 1997, the mean age of women at the time of surgery increased from 50.5 +/- 12.1 years to 56.6 +/- 13.3 years; mean length of hospital stay decreased from 9.9 +/- 4.5 days to 2.7 +/- 1.4 days (P <.001).
CONCLUSION: The rate of surgery for urinary incontinence in women has nearly doubled from 1979 to 1997.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12861141     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  20 in total

1.  Validation, reliability, and responsiveness of Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QOL) in a Brazilian population.

Authors:  Andrea Scarlato; Carolina Chaves Cunha Souza; Eliana Suelotto Machado Fonseca; Marair Gracio Ferreira Sartori; Manoel João Batista de Castello Girão; Rodrigo Aquino Castro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Trends in inpatient urinary incontinence surgery in the USA, 1998-2007.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Mihir P Gandhi; Aparna D Shah; Jatin Y Shah; Rebekah G Fulton; Alison C Weidner
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Surgery for stress urinary incontinence in Finland 1987-2009.

Authors:  Kaisa Kurkijärvi; Riikka Aaltonen; Mika Gissler; Juha Mäkinen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Pelvic organ prolapse: demographics and future growth prospects.

Authors:  Harold P Drutz; May Alarab
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-06

5.  Graphic integration of causal factors of pelvic floor disorders: an integrated life span model.

Authors:  John O L Delancey; Lisa Kane Low; Janis M Miller; Divya A Patel; Julie A Tumbarello
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Incidence and contributing factors of perioperative complications in surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Hanan Alshankiti; Sara Houlihan; Magali Robert
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Michele Jonsson Funk; Pamela J Levin; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Self-reported pelvic organ prolapse surgery, prevalence, and nonobstetric risk factors: findings from the Nord Trøndelag Health Study.

Authors:  Risa Anna Margaretha Lonnée-Hoffmann; Øyvind Salvesen; Siv Mørkved; Berit Schei
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Is the leak point pressure alone an accurate indicator of intrinsic sphincteric deficiency?

Authors:  Miles Murphy; Patrick J Culligan; Carol A Graham; Kari M Kubik; Michael H Heit
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-07-08

10.  Self-perceived natural history of pelvic organ prolapse described by women presenting for treatment.

Authors:  Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Rebecca U Margulies; Kindra Larson; Dee E Fenner; Daniel M Morgan; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.