Literature DB >> 23706251

Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries, 2002-2007.

Lisa Rogo-Gupta1, Mark S Litwin, Christopher S Saigal, Jennifer T Anger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in the United States from 2002 to 2007.
METHODS: As part of the Urologic Diseases of America Project, we analyzed data from a 5% national random sample of female Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older. Data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services carrier and outpatient files from 2002 to 2007. Women who were diagnosed with urinary incontinence identified by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition (ICD-9) diagnosis codes and who underwent surgical management identified by Current Procedural Terminology, Fourth Edition (CPT-4) procedure codes were included in the analysis. Trends were analyzed over the 6-year period. Unweighted procedure counts were multiplied by 20 to estimate the rate among all female Medicare beneficiaries.
RESULTS: The total number of surgical procedures remained stable during the study period, from 49,340 in 2002 to 49,900 in 2007. Slings were the most common procedure across all years, which increased from 25,840 procedures in 2002 to 33,880 procedures in 2007. Injectable bulking agents were the second most common procedure, which accounted for 14,100 procedures in 2002 but decreased to 11,320 in 2007. Procedures performed in ambulatory surgery centers and physician offices increased, although those performed in inpatient settings declined. Hospital outpatient procedures remained stable.
CONCLUSION: The surgical management of women with SUI shifted toward a dominance of procedures performed in ambulatory surgery centers from 2002 to 2007, although the overall number of procedures remained stable. Slings remained the dominant surgical procedure, followed by injectable bulking agents, both of which are easily performed in outpatient settings.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23706251      PMCID: PMC3757126          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

1.  Urinary incontinence in women.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Burch colposuspension: a 10-20 year follow up.

Authors:  M Alcalay; A Monga; S L Stanton
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1995-09

3.  Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Michele Jonsson Funk; Pamela J Levin; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Amie Kawasaki; Andrew F Hundley; Alexis A Dieter; Evan R Myers; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Joachim W Thüroff; Paul Abrams; Karl-Erik Andersson; Walter Artibani; Christopher R Chapple; Marcus J Drake; Christian Hampel; Andreas Neisius; Annette Schröder; Andrea Tubaro
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Haroon Rehman; Carlos Cb Bezerra; Homero Bruschini; June D Cody
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-01-19

7.  A multicenter study of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  U Ulmsten; C Falconer; P Johnson; M Jomaa; L Lannér; C G Nilsson; I Olsson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

8.  A three year follow-up of a prospective open randomized trial to compare tension-free vaginal tape with Burch colposuspension for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Miguel Téllez Martínez-Fornés; Cristina Fernández Pérez; Concepción Fouz López; Cristina Fernández Lucas; Jaime Borrego Hernando
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.994

9.  Trends in surgical management of stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Aviva E Weinberg; Michael E Albo; Ariana L Smith; Ja-Hong Kim; Larissa V Rodríguez; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Urinary incontinence and self-reported health among the U.S. Medicare managed care beneficiaries.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Chang; Chris M Gonzalez; Denys T Lau; Herbert C Sier
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2008-03-27
View more
  12 in total

1.  Surgery for stress urinary incontinence in Finland 1987-2009.

Authors:  Kaisa Kurkijärvi; Riikka Aaltonen; Mika Gissler; Juha Mäkinen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Making surgery safer through adequate communication with the stakeholders: vaginal slings.

Authors:  Sandra Elmer; Janelle Brennan; Rebecca Mathieson; Briony Norris; Marcus Carey; Caroline Dowling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Costs analysis of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a brazilian public hospital, comparing burch and synthetic sling techniques.

Authors:  Leo Francisco Limberger; Fernanda Pacheco Faria; Luciana Silveira Campos; Karin Marise Jaeger Anzolch; Alexandre Fornari
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

4.  A comprehensive look at risk factors for mid-urethral sling revision surgery.

Authors:  Melissa Keslar; Haroutyoun Margossian; Justin E Katz; Nisha Lakhi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Evaluation of the local carcinogenic potential of mesh used in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; Emanuel C Trabuco; Daniel A Carranza; John B Gebhart; Christopher J Klingele; John A Occhino
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The impact of the 2011 US Food and Drug Administration transvaginal mesh communication on utilization of synthetic mid-urethral sling procedures.

Authors:  Alexander A Berger; Jasmine Tan-Kim; Shawn A Menefee
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  The surgical trends and time-frame comparison of primary surgery for stress urinary incontinence, 2006-2010 vs 1997-2005: a population-based nation-wide follow-up descriptive study.

Authors:  Chia-Jen Wu; Yat-Ching Tong; Sheng-Mou Hsiao; Ching-Chung Liang; So-Jung Liang; Shih-Feng Weng; Ming-Ping Wu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Adverse Events Associated With Synthetic Male Slings: An Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database.

Authors:  Hanson Zhao; Colby P Souders; Paige K Kuhlmann; Kai Dallas; Karyn Eilber; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Long-Term Outcomes After Midurethral Mesh Sling Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Sara Z Dejene; Michele Jonsson Funk; Virginia Pate; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.913

10.  Road to recovery after transvaginal surgery for urethral mesh perforation: evaluation of outcomes and subsequent procedures.

Authors:  Casey G Kowalik; Joshua A Cohn; Andrea Kakos; Patrick Lang; W Stuart Reynolds; Melissa R Kaufman; Mickey M Karram; Roger R Dmochowski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.